Audience Question - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Audience Question

Description:

Speaker: 'Dr Mitchell Creinin, what were the 'SMALL PRINT' issues for him? Audience Discussion: ... Report Adverse Events (P) Replace content of 38 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ccit
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Audience Question


1
Audience Question
Replace content of Slide 25
  • Study Coordinators and research assistants
    change over time, so if you have an IND and
    ongoing study, are you supposed to inform the FDA
    that your study coordinator is a different
    person or if you have a new research assistant?

2
Review Warning Letter (WL) Cases
Place between slides 37 and 38
  • Instructions
  • Click Stop Button under video window
  • Read all 3 Warning Letters (Click each name)
  • Mitchell Creinin
  • Michael Gruber
  • Alkis Togias
  • Match statements in WLs with SMALL PRINT issues
  • e.g. failed to retainrecords R (Retain
    records)
  • Restart video by clicking under video
    window

3
Speaker Dr Mitchell Creinin, what were the
SMALL PRINT issues for him?
  • Audience Discussion
  • Maintain Records (M)
  • Adhere to Protocol (A)
  • Inform Subjects (I)
  • Notify IRB (N)
  • Report Adverse Events (P)

Replace content of slide 38
4
Speaker Dr. Michael Gruber, what were the
problems with his study?
  • Audience Discussion
  • Maintain Records (M)
  • Lack of source data
  • Supervise (S)
  • Investigator as team leader in charge of study
  • Adhere to Protocol (A)
  • Retain Records (R)

Replace content of slide 40
5
Speaker Dr. Togias, what were the 2 most
significant issues?
  • Audience Discussion
  • He did not file an IND.
  • Drug crossed state lines and was administered
    without FDA approval of IND.
  • A normal healthy volunteer died.

Replace content of slide 42
6
Speaker Other findings with Dr. Togias?
  • Audience Discussion
  • Adhere to Protocol (A)
  • Inadequate protocol
  • Change protocol on a whim
  • Notify IRB (N)
  • Report Adverse Events (P)
  • Learn IB (L)
  • No animal data
  • Maintain and Retain Records (M) (R)

Replace content of slide 44
7
Read OHRP Determination Letters
Place between slides 48 and 49
  • Instructions
  • Click Stop Button under video window
  • Click each date for letter
  • Jul 19, 2001 (MPA Suspension)
  • Jul 23, 2001 (MPA Reinstatement)
  • Oct 03, 2001 (1st Monthly Report)
  • Aug 23, 2002 (Followup inspection)
  • Restart video by clicking under video
    window

8
Speaker Who can tell me what OHRP stands for?
  • Audience Answer
  • Office of Human Research Protection

Replace content of slide 51
9
Review Determination LetterCase 1 John Hopkins
University
Place between slides 58 and 59
  • Instructions
  • Click Stop Button under video window
  • Click Date for letter
  • Dec 14, 2001 (Dr. Rolley E. Johnson)
  • Restart video by clicking under video
    window

10
Speaker introduces Case 1
Replace Slides 60 and 61
  • Audience discusses

11
Review Determination LetterCase 2 Thomas
Jefferson University
Place between slides 61 and 62
  • Instructions
  • Click Stop Button under video window
  • Click Date for letter
  • Dec 11, 2001 (Dr. David W. Andrews)
  • Restart video by clicking under video
    window

12
Speaker introduces Case 2
Replace Slides 63 and 64
  • Audience discusses

13
Review Determination Letter Case 3
Massachusetts General Hospital
Place between slides 65 and 66
  • Instructions
  • Click Stop Button under video window
  • Click Date for letter
  • Apr 03, 2002 (Dr. John Growden)
  • Restart video by clicking under video
    window

14
Speaker introduces Case 3
Replace Slides 67 and 68
  • Audience discusses

15
Review Determination LetterCase 4 John Hopkins
University
Place between slides 68 and 69
  • Instructions
  • Click Stop Button under video window
  • Click Date for letter
  • Aug 19, 2002 (Dr. Mark Farfel)
  • Restart video by clicking under video
    window

16
Speaker introduces Case 4
Replace Slide 70
  • Audience discusses

17
Summary Determination Letters
Include as Slide 73
  • Not always determinations of non-compliance.
  • Of interest in terms of current OHRP
    interpretations -- recognizing that you are
    getting only one side of the story
  • Actions/corrective actions taken by the
    institutions although the institution may
    require actions by the investigator.

18
Summary Warning Letter (WL) versus Determination
Letter (DL)
Include as Slide 74
  • Source
  • WL FDA
  • DL OHRP
  • Target Audience
  • WL e.g., Investigators, IRBs, not Institution
    level
  • DL Institution, not Investigator, IRB levels
  • Cause
  • WL FDA Inspection noting serious compliance
    problems
  • DL Various reports including institution self
    reports
  • Issuance and Inspections
  • WL Always issued post FDA site inspection
  • DL Usually issued pre OHRP site inspection, if
    any
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com