DHCPv6 Relay Agent Information Option and RADIUS Attributes Sub-option draft-droms-dhc-v6-relayopt-00.txt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

DHCPv6 Relay Agent Information Option and RADIUS Attributes Sub-option draft-droms-dhc-v6-relayopt-00.txt

Description:

draft-dhc-agentopt-radius-08.txt (approved by IESG to become a proposed standard in Sept 04) ... The Vendor-Specific Information Option in RFC3315 was also ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: sivavee
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DHCPv6 Relay Agent Information Option and RADIUS Attributes Sub-option draft-droms-dhc-v6-relayopt-00.txt


1
DHCPv6 Relay Agent Information Optionand RADIUS
Attributes Sub-optiondraft-droms-dhc-v6-relayopt-
00.txt
  • Ralph Droms and Wing Cheong Lau
  • Nov 9, 2004

2
Objective
  • To provide an option for DHCPv6 Relay Agents to
    insert Information when forwarding
    client-originated message to a DHCPv6 server so
    that
  • DHCPv6 servers recognizing the Relay Agent
    Information option MAY use the information as a
    HINT to implement IP address or other parameter
    assignment policies.
  • In particular, we are interested in the scenario
    where
  • the DHCPv6 Relay Agent is also a NAS and
  • the Relayed Information contains RADIUS
    Attributes obtained by the NAS from the AAA
    server during the L2 access authentication
    process.

3
Operations of DHCPv6 Relay Agent Info Option and
RADIUS Attributes sub-option
  • The relayed information is inserted (echoed) as
    an option in the Relay-Forward (Relay-Reply)
    Message, in the same manner as the insertion of
    the existing DHCPv6 Interface Option in RFC3315
  • DHCPv6 client is unaware of the Option
  • gt Does not interfere with the current
    authentication model between the DHCPv6 client
    and server

4
Related Work
  • Similar Relay Agent Information Option, RADIUS
    Attributes Sub-option and other sub-options
    already exist for DHCPv4 in Cable Modem/ DSL, as
    well as 802.1X applications
  • RFC 3046 and
  • draft-dhc-agentopt-radius-08.txt (approved by
    IESG to become a proposed standard in Sept 04).
  • It also identifies the list of safe RADIUS
    Attributes to be relayed (to avoid interactions
    of RADIUS/DHCP state machines)
  • User-Name (RFC 2865)
  • Service-Type (RFC 2865)
  • Vendor-Specific (RFC 2865)
  • Session-Timeout (RFC 2865)
  • Framed-Pool (RFC 2869)
  • Framed-IPv6-Pool (RFC 3162)
  • draft-ietf-dhc-vendor-suboption-00.txt

5
Some Feedbacks from dhc Mailing List
  • Instead of a 2-level hierarchy of DHCP Relay
    Information Relay Option/ RADIUS Attributes
    sub-option, why not just using a single option to
    relay RADIUS-Attributes
  • Our original intent was to introduce general
    relay capability for DHCPv6 relay agents, e.g.
    for other future sub-options such as the
    Vendor-Specific Information Option BUT it was
    pointed out in the Mailing list that
  • The Vendor-Specific Information Option in RFC3315
    was also intended to be used by the Relay Agent
    although the current text in RFC 3315 does not
    describe such usage
  • Unlike DHCPv4, there is enough code-points for
    DHCPv6 option field
  • Single-level option would allow 16-bit RRAO
    length gt remove practical restriction on length
    of RADIUS Attributes to be relayed
  • To change to a single-level Relayed RADIUS
    Attributes Option (RRAO) in the next revision.

6
Some Feedbacks from dhc Mailing List (contd)
  • Concern of cross-domain RADIUS operations where
    Home AAA server and DHCP relay-agent/server
    belong to different administrative domains
  • Current applicability statement already
    clearly states that the proposed mechanism would
    not provide robust operations across arbitrary
    RADIUS domains.
  • However, the proposed approach can be used to
    support roaming applications across Service
    Providers who
  • (1) Have Pre-established Roaming agreements and
  • (2) Are willing to accept the Risks, Limitations
    and Required Coordinations/ Precautions of
    supporting cross-domain RADIUS service, e.g. as
    discussed in RFC 2607.

7
Next Steps
  • To be accepted as a WG working Item ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com