Increasing the Likelihood of Obtaining a Degree and Transitioning from Postsecondary Education to Em - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Increasing the Likelihood of Obtaining a Degree and Transitioning from Postsecondary Education to Em

Description:

Several different search engines. Journal reference lists. Hand searched major journals ... Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 133-146. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: james1106
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Increasing the Likelihood of Obtaining a Degree and Transitioning from Postsecondary Education to Em


1
Increasing the Likelihood of Obtaining a Degree
and Transitioning from Postsecondary Education to
Employment or Further Education
Look under the presentation tab on the left of
the following website url to download this
PowerPoint file and other supporting information
at http//education.ou.edu/zarrow/
  • Jim Martin, Ph.D.
  • University of Oklahoma
  • Zarrow Center for Learning Enrichment
  • jemartin_at_ou.edu
  • http//education.ou.edu/zarrow/

2
What We Still Need to Do To Finish the Job
Alternative Title
3
The Reason Why - 1
4
The Reason Why -2
5
Transition from High School to IHEs
  • 53 of students with disabilities plan on
    attending an education program after leaving high
    school compared to 95 of their non-disabled
    peers (Wagner, Newman, Cameto, Garza, Levine,
    2005).
  • Yet only 19 of youth with disabilities follow
    through compared to 40 of their non-disabled
    peers (Wagner et al., 2005).
  • The rate of current enrollment of youth with
    disabilities in 2-year/ community colleges is not
    significantly different from that of their peers
    in the general population (10 vs. 12).
  • Similar-age youth without disabilities are more
    than four and one-half times as likely as youth
    with disabilities to be currently taking courses
    at a 4-year college (28 vs. 6, plt.001).

6
The Numbers
  • College freshman with a disabilities increased
    from 2.6 in 1978 to 9 in 1996 (Cameto, Newman
    Wagner, 2006).
  • Surveys of freshman at 4-year colleges report the
    percent of students with disabilities has gone
    from 3, up to 9, then down to 6 (Henderson,
    1998, 2001)
  • 9 of students with disabilities enroll at
    four-year colleges. Non-disabled peers are 4.5
    times more likely to be enrolled (Wagner et al.,
    2005)

7
Disclosure IHE Disability Support
  • Of youth with a high school IEP in IHE (Wagner et
    al., 2005).
  • 52 do not believe they have a disability
  • 7 believe they have a disability but did not
    disclose
  • 40 identified having a disability
  • 88 of students who identified received services
  • Put all of this together, about a third of
    students with IEPs in high school receive IHE
    disability support

8
Retention and Graduation
  • Two-year retention data at OU finds that students
    with and without disabilities return to OU to
    study at equal numbers (OU Institutional
    Research, 2006).
  • Only 4 of students with disabilities who had
    enrolled in two-year colleges had graduated
    (Cameto, Newman Wagner, 2006).
  • One percent of the students with disabilities
    enrolled in 4-year schools graduated in a
    four-year period (Cameto et al., 2006).
  • 20 of students with LD who began IHE graduate 5
    years after high school compared to 44 for
    students without LD (Murray, Goldstein, Nourse,
    Edgar, 2000).
  • 10 years after high school, 44 of students with
    LD graduated compared to 78 without disabilities
    (Murray, et al., 2000).
  • After six years at OU 55 of undergraduates
    without disabilities graduate compared to 28 of
    their peers with disabilities (OU Institutional
    Research, 2006).

9
After Graduation from IHE
  • Graduates with LD employed at comparable rates as
    former students with LD (Madaus, Foley, McGuire,
    Ruban, 2001).
  • Earning a degree from an IHE benefits the
    employment outcome of adults with learning
    disabilities (Madaus, 2006).
  • Students with other disabilities graduating from
    IHEs appear to have less positive results
    (Roessler, Hennessey, Rumrill (2007).
  • Some students with disabilities at IHEs lack the
    skills and confidence to seek employment
    (Corrigan, Jones, McWhirter, 2001).

10
Whats Going On?
  • Why do so few students with disabilities enter
    higher ed?
  • What happens to the dreams?
  • Why the poor long-term graduation rate?
  • Why do fewer students with disabilities who
    graduate from college continue to graduate
    school?
  • Why do some students with disabilities (maybe as
    many as 33) experience trouble transitioning
    from IHE into employment?

11
The Other Transition Is There Another Task to Do?
  • Transition education for students with
    disabilities (Sitlington, 2003)
  • Enrolled in higher education programs
  • Preparing to move from higher education into
    full-time careers
  • Higher Ed needs to strongly consider adopting
    transition education practices to finish the job
    (Roessler, Hennessey, Rumrill, 2007).
  • Where and Who?
  • Disability Resource Centers?
  • Career Development Offices?

12
Transition Education Assessment
  • Adaptive Behavior Assessment
  • Vocational Interest and Skills Assessment
  • Postschool Predictor Assessment

13
Missing Link In Transition
  • We need a transition assessment tool based on
    actual postschool success predictors.
  • We need a tool to assess students current
    behavior linked to identified transition success
    predictors.
  • No tool like this exists (that we could find).

14
Postschool Success Predictors
  • Reviewed the literature to identify student
    behaviors that predicted postschool success.
  • 45 quantitative and qualitative studies
  • Several different search engines
  • Journal reference lists
  • Hand searched major journals
  • Asked colleagues around the country

15
14 Concept Clusters
16
Transition Success Assessment
  • Transition Success Assessment A Transition
    Behavior Profile
  • 46 items
  • Professional, Family, and Student TSA Versions
  • TSA Graphic Profile
  • TSA Goal Identification Matrix
  • Takes about 10 minutes to answer the items and
    score

17
Wording of TSA Items
  • Fine tuned wording internally at ZC
  • Conducted six social validity groups
  • 4 expert panels (27 participants)
  • 1 parent panel (8 participants)
  • 1 student panel (8 participants)
  • 1 more student panel to go
  • First round produced changes to 36 of 50
    Professional TSA items
  • Subsequent panels made fewer and fewer changes

18
Issues Expressed by Social Validity Groups
  • Family group focused on wording associated with
    friends, asking for support, coping skills, and
    independent living.
  • Students did not like the word used.
  • Professional group more sensitive regarding words
    such as limitation and disability awareness.
  • Very positive feedback from all the groups
  • Easy to understand and use
  • Makes sense
  • Beneficial to planning students future
  • Now I understand what to teach
  • Found the TSA practical

19
Remaining Tasks
  • Complete internal reliability study with at least
    100 professionals, 100 students, and 50 parents
  • Test-retest reliability (four weeks apart)
  • Factor analysis of items to determine final
    clusters
  • Complete user manual
  • Disseminate final TSA

20
IES Grant Submitted
  • Submitted grant to IES to conduct large scale
    studies
  • Structural equation modeling to build construct
    validation
  • Test parallel versions (student, professional,
    and family)
  • Similar factor structure across tools
  • Reliability studies across country
  • Undertake predictor studies

21
Benefits of Using TSA for IHEs
  • Defines behaviors students need to learn to
    increase likelihood of transition from IHE to
    employment or further education.
  • Provides goals and objectives to begin
    self-improvement efforts or to target
    instructional programs to improve specific
    behaviors

22
Transition Success Assessment Draft 45
23
Transition Success Assessment
  • Provides a means to identify specific skills
    students need to learn.
  • Apply the Self-Determination Model of Instruction
    concepts to teaching many of these skills (Finn,
    Getzel, McManus, in press).
  • Target instructional efforts.
  • Build students confidence.

24
Where Does Transition Education Fit?
  • Disability Resource Center staff need to advocate
    for adopting transition education practices.
  • Use local and national numbers to support
    efforts.
  • Work with campus support systems.
  • May become a job of DRC or Career Development
    Offices.

25
References
  • Cameto, R., Newman, L., Wagner, M. (June,
    2006). The National Longitudinal Transition
    Study-2 (NLTS2) Project Update Self-perceptions
    of youth with disabilities. Washington, DC
    Institute of Education Sciences.
  • Corrigan, M., Jones, C., McWhirter, J. (2001).
    College students with disabilities An access
    employment group. Journal for Specialists in
    Group Work, 26, 339-349.
  • Finn, D., Getzel, E. E., McManus, S. (in
    press). Adapting the Self-Determined Learning
    Model for instruction of college students with
    disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional
    Individuals.
  • Henderson, C. (1998). Profile of 1996 college
    freshmen with disabilities. Washington, DC HEATH
    Resource Center, American Council on Education.
  • Henderson, C. (2001). College freshman with
    disabilities A biennial statistical profile.
    Washington, DC HEATH Resource Center, American
    Council on Education.
  • Madaus, J. E. (2006). Employment outcomes of
    university graduates with learning disabilities.
    Learning Disability Quarterly,29, 19-w31.
  • Madaus, J. W., Foley, T. E., McGuire, J. M.,
    Rubin, L. (2001). A follow-up investigation of
    university graduates with learning disabilities.
    Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,
    24, 133-146.
  • Murray, C., Goldstein, D. E. Nourse, S., Edgar,
    E. (2000). The postsecondary school attendance
    and completion rates of high school graduates
    with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities
    Quarterly, 15, 119-127.
  • Roessler, R. T., Hennessey, M. L., Rumrill, Ph.
    D. (2007). Strategies for improving career
    services for postsecondary students with
    disabilities Results of a focus group study of
    key stakeholders. Career Development for
    Exceptional Individuals, 30, 158-170.
  • Sitlington, P. L. (2003). Postsecondary
    education The other transition. Exceptionality,
    11, 103-113.
  • University of Oklahoma Institutional Research and
    Reporting. (2006, June). Students with
    disabilities. Norman, Oklahoma.
  • Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N.,
    and Levine, P. (2005). After High School A First
    Look at the Postschool Experiences of Youth with
    Disabilities. A Report from the National
    Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) Menlo
    Park, CA SRI International. Available at
    www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_04/nlts2_report_2005_04
    _complete.pdf.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com