Title: Increasing the Likelihood of Obtaining a Degree and Transitioning from Postsecondary Education to Em
1Increasing the Likelihood of Obtaining a Degree
and Transitioning from Postsecondary Education to
Employment or Further Education
Look under the presentation tab on the left of
the following website url to download this
PowerPoint file and other supporting information
at http//education.ou.edu/zarrow/
- Jim Martin, Ph.D.
- University of Oklahoma
- Zarrow Center for Learning Enrichment
- jemartin_at_ou.edu
- http//education.ou.edu/zarrow/
2What We Still Need to Do To Finish the Job
Alternative Title
3The Reason Why - 1
4The Reason Why -2
5Transition from High School to IHEs
- 53 of students with disabilities plan on
attending an education program after leaving high
school compared to 95 of their non-disabled
peers (Wagner, Newman, Cameto, Garza, Levine,
2005). - Yet only 19 of youth with disabilities follow
through compared to 40 of their non-disabled
peers (Wagner et al., 2005). - The rate of current enrollment of youth with
disabilities in 2-year/ community colleges is not
significantly different from that of their peers
in the general population (10 vs. 12). - Similar-age youth without disabilities are more
than four and one-half times as likely as youth
with disabilities to be currently taking courses
at a 4-year college (28 vs. 6, plt.001).
6The Numbers
- College freshman with a disabilities increased
from 2.6 in 1978 to 9 in 1996 (Cameto, Newman
Wagner, 2006). - Surveys of freshman at 4-year colleges report the
percent of students with disabilities has gone
from 3, up to 9, then down to 6 (Henderson,
1998, 2001) - 9 of students with disabilities enroll at
four-year colleges. Non-disabled peers are 4.5
times more likely to be enrolled (Wagner et al.,
2005)
7Disclosure IHE Disability Support
- Of youth with a high school IEP in IHE (Wagner et
al., 2005). - 52 do not believe they have a disability
- 7 believe they have a disability but did not
disclose - 40 identified having a disability
- 88 of students who identified received services
- Put all of this together, about a third of
students with IEPs in high school receive IHE
disability support
8Retention and Graduation
- Two-year retention data at OU finds that students
with and without disabilities return to OU to
study at equal numbers (OU Institutional
Research, 2006). - Only 4 of students with disabilities who had
enrolled in two-year colleges had graduated
(Cameto, Newman Wagner, 2006). - One percent of the students with disabilities
enrolled in 4-year schools graduated in a
four-year period (Cameto et al., 2006). - 20 of students with LD who began IHE graduate 5
years after high school compared to 44 for
students without LD (Murray, Goldstein, Nourse,
Edgar, 2000). - 10 years after high school, 44 of students with
LD graduated compared to 78 without disabilities
(Murray, et al., 2000). - After six years at OU 55 of undergraduates
without disabilities graduate compared to 28 of
their peers with disabilities (OU Institutional
Research, 2006).
9After Graduation from IHE
- Graduates with LD employed at comparable rates as
former students with LD (Madaus, Foley, McGuire,
Ruban, 2001). - Earning a degree from an IHE benefits the
employment outcome of adults with learning
disabilities (Madaus, 2006). - Students with other disabilities graduating from
IHEs appear to have less positive results
(Roessler, Hennessey, Rumrill (2007). - Some students with disabilities at IHEs lack the
skills and confidence to seek employment
(Corrigan, Jones, McWhirter, 2001).
10Whats Going On?
- Why do so few students with disabilities enter
higher ed? - What happens to the dreams?
- Why the poor long-term graduation rate?
- Why do fewer students with disabilities who
graduate from college continue to graduate
school? - Why do some students with disabilities (maybe as
many as 33) experience trouble transitioning
from IHE into employment?
11The Other Transition Is There Another Task to Do?
- Transition education for students with
disabilities (Sitlington, 2003) - Enrolled in higher education programs
- Preparing to move from higher education into
full-time careers - Higher Ed needs to strongly consider adopting
transition education practices to finish the job
(Roessler, Hennessey, Rumrill, 2007). - Where and Who?
- Disability Resource Centers?
- Career Development Offices?
12Transition Education Assessment
- Adaptive Behavior Assessment
- Vocational Interest and Skills Assessment
- Postschool Predictor Assessment
13Missing Link In Transition
- We need a transition assessment tool based on
actual postschool success predictors. - We need a tool to assess students current
behavior linked to identified transition success
predictors. - No tool like this exists (that we could find).
14Postschool Success Predictors
- Reviewed the literature to identify student
behaviors that predicted postschool success. - 45 quantitative and qualitative studies
- Several different search engines
- Journal reference lists
- Hand searched major journals
- Asked colleagues around the country
-
1514 Concept Clusters
16Transition Success Assessment
- Transition Success Assessment A Transition
Behavior Profile - 46 items
- Professional, Family, and Student TSA Versions
- TSA Graphic Profile
- TSA Goal Identification Matrix
- Takes about 10 minutes to answer the items and
score
17Wording of TSA Items
- Fine tuned wording internally at ZC
- Conducted six social validity groups
- 4 expert panels (27 participants)
- 1 parent panel (8 participants)
- 1 student panel (8 participants)
- 1 more student panel to go
- First round produced changes to 36 of 50
Professional TSA items - Subsequent panels made fewer and fewer changes
18Issues Expressed by Social Validity Groups
- Family group focused on wording associated with
friends, asking for support, coping skills, and
independent living. - Students did not like the word used.
- Professional group more sensitive regarding words
such as limitation and disability awareness. - Very positive feedback from all the groups
- Easy to understand and use
- Makes sense
- Beneficial to planning students future
- Now I understand what to teach
- Found the TSA practical
19Remaining Tasks
- Complete internal reliability study with at least
100 professionals, 100 students, and 50 parents - Test-retest reliability (four weeks apart)
- Factor analysis of items to determine final
clusters - Complete user manual
- Disseminate final TSA
20IES Grant Submitted
- Submitted grant to IES to conduct large scale
studies - Structural equation modeling to build construct
validation - Test parallel versions (student, professional,
and family) - Similar factor structure across tools
- Reliability studies across country
- Undertake predictor studies
21Benefits of Using TSA for IHEs
- Defines behaviors students need to learn to
increase likelihood of transition from IHE to
employment or further education. - Provides goals and objectives to begin
self-improvement efforts or to target
instructional programs to improve specific
behaviors
22Transition Success Assessment Draft 45
23Transition Success Assessment
- Provides a means to identify specific skills
students need to learn. - Apply the Self-Determination Model of Instruction
concepts to teaching many of these skills (Finn,
Getzel, McManus, in press). - Target instructional efforts.
- Build students confidence.
24Where Does Transition Education Fit?
- Disability Resource Center staff need to advocate
for adopting transition education practices. - Use local and national numbers to support
efforts. - Work with campus support systems.
- May become a job of DRC or Career Development
Offices.
25References
- Cameto, R., Newman, L., Wagner, M. (June,
2006). The National Longitudinal Transition
Study-2 (NLTS2) Project Update Self-perceptions
of youth with disabilities. Washington, DC
Institute of Education Sciences. - Corrigan, M., Jones, C., McWhirter, J. (2001).
College students with disabilities An access
employment group. Journal for Specialists in
Group Work, 26, 339-349. - Finn, D., Getzel, E. E., McManus, S. (in
press). Adapting the Self-Determined Learning
Model for instruction of college students with
disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional
Individuals. - Henderson, C. (1998). Profile of 1996 college
freshmen with disabilities. Washington, DC HEATH
Resource Center, American Council on Education. - Henderson, C. (2001). College freshman with
disabilities A biennial statistical profile.
Washington, DC HEATH Resource Center, American
Council on Education. - Madaus, J. E. (2006). Employment outcomes of
university graduates with learning disabilities.
Learning Disability Quarterly,29, 19-w31. - Madaus, J. W., Foley, T. E., McGuire, J. M.,
Rubin, L. (2001). A follow-up investigation of
university graduates with learning disabilities.
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,
24, 133-146. - Murray, C., Goldstein, D. E. Nourse, S., Edgar,
E. (2000). The postsecondary school attendance
and completion rates of high school graduates
with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities
Quarterly, 15, 119-127. - Roessler, R. T., Hennessey, M. L., Rumrill, Ph.
D. (2007). Strategies for improving career
services for postsecondary students with
disabilities Results of a focus group study of
key stakeholders. Career Development for
Exceptional Individuals, 30, 158-170. - Sitlington, P. L. (2003). Postsecondary
education The other transition. Exceptionality,
11, 103-113. - University of Oklahoma Institutional Research and
Reporting. (2006, June). Students with
disabilities. Norman, Oklahoma. - Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N.,
and Levine, P. (2005). After High School A First
Look at the Postschool Experiences of Youth with
Disabilities. A Report from the National
Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) Menlo
Park, CA SRI International. Available at
www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_04/nlts2_report_2005_04
_complete.pdf.