EFFECT OF INJECTING MODIFIED BEEF TENDON SOLUTIONS ON QUALITY OF BEEF ROASTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

EFFECT OF INJECTING MODIFIED BEEF TENDON SOLUTIONS ON QUALITY OF BEEF ROASTS

Description:

... MODIFIED BEEF TENDON SOLUTIONS ON QUALITY OF BEEF ROASTS ... Roasts were injected to 15 ... were cut from each roast, randomly vacuum packaged in pairs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: ficryg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EFFECT OF INJECTING MODIFIED BEEF TENDON SOLUTIONS ON QUALITY OF BEEF ROASTS


1
  • EFFECT OF INJECTING MODIFIED BEEF TENDON
    SOLUTIONS ON QUALITY OF BEEF ROASTS
  • O. Esquivel and R.W. Mandigo
  • Department of Animal Science, University of
    Nebraska -Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0908

Results
  • Challenge
  • Can beef tendons be upgraded to produce material
    suitable for injection of whole muscle products?
  • How would the injection process affect the
    quality characteristics of the finished cuts?

Table 1. Collagen concentration in tendon
solutions
  • Bromelin treated solutions had higher
  • collagen concentration

Materials and Methods

Table 2. Package purge by injection treatment and
day
Table 3. L values by injection treatment and day
CONNECTIVE TISSUE RAW MATERIAL
Ground twice
Triceps brachii tendons
12 mm
3 mm
  • C and NI samples were lighter
  • Lightness increases with time
  • No purge differences by injection treatment
  • Purge loss increases with time

Tendons frozen in shallow pans (-20ºC)
Bagged and stored frozen until used
Figure 1. Predicted a value by injection
treatment and day
Figure 2. Predicted b value by injection
treatment and day
Tendons were cooked in a water bath to 75ºC
internal temperature, filtered through cheese
cloth and the collagen solutions stored
refrigerated in bottles
  • Slopes for predicted a and b values are similar
    among treatments
  • Predicted a for NI samples were always higher
  • No differences for predicted b values among
    treatments
  • Two treatments
  • Tendons water salt phosphate (C-collagen)
  • Tendons water salt phosphate bromelin
    (B-collagen)

Table 4. Cooking losses () by injection treatment
Table 5. Peak force (kg) by injection treatment
MEAT RAW MATERIAL
  • Six USDA select grade semitendinosus muscles were
    cut in halves
  • and pieces were randomly assigned to 4 injection
    treatments (3/treatment)
  • Injection brine with B- collagen (B)
  • Injection brine with C-collagen (C)
  • 3. Injection brine with water-salt-phosphate
    only (SP)
  • 4. Not any injection (NI)
  • C and B lost more than SP samples
  • NI were similar to B and SP samples
  • No peak force differences by
  • injection treatment
  • Roasts were injected to 15 weight gain
  • All injection brines formulated for equal levels
    of salt and phosphates
  • Pieces were bagged and tumbled for 30 min

Table 6. Sensory scores by injection treatment
(n45 panelists).
  • B samples were more tender,
  • juicier and flavorful
  • B and SP were juicier than NI
  • and C samples
  • C and NI samples were similar in
  • every attribute

After tumbling, six 2cm steaks were cut from each
roast, randomly vacuum packaged in pairs and
stored in the dark at refrigeration temperature
(-2 2ºC)
  • A 2-steaks package was opened at day 1, 8 and 15
    post-injection
  • Package purge () and color L, a and b were
    measured
  • Steaks were vacuum packaged and refrigerated again
  • Conclusions
  • Tendons can be successfully modified and injected
    into whole muscle model-system products.
  • Injection of bromelin treated tendons has
    potential to improve palatability of beef roasts.

Steaks were cooked to 72ºC internal temperature
and cooking losses measured
Two steaks sheared with a Warner-Bratzler
attachment
Two steaks cut in 3 cm3 cubes for sensory
evaluation by 45 untrained panelists
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com