Investigating the Production of W and Z Bosons at LHCb - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Investigating the Production of W and Z Bosons at LHCb

Description:

A PDF describes probabilities of finding a quark or gluon with particular values ... Use mcfm-5.1 to generate data A Monte Carlo for FeMto barn processes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: hepPh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Investigating the Production of W and Z Bosons at LHCb


1
Investigating the Production of W and Z Bosons at
LHCb
  • Stephanie Donleavy

2
Investigations
  • Will look at
  • Numbers of bosons produced
  • W and Z production and decay mechanisms
  • Comparison between theories

1
3
Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs)
  • A PDF describes probabilities of finding a quark
    or gluon with particular values of x and Q2
  • PDFs extracted from fits to experimental data
  • Theoretical prediction for W and Z production at
    LHC
  • NLO electroweak PDF
  • Theory error NLO error PDF error so precise
    Standard Model test can be made where theory and
    PDF are well known
  • Where PDF errors are large, experimental data
    can be used to constrain them

2
4
At LHCb
  • Mainly B physics but many Ws and Zs produced as
    well.
  • At an integrated luminosity of 500 pb-1
  • 2.44 x 106 W bosons
  • 1.2 x 105 Z bosons

(In the LHCb acceptance)
3
5
W and Z Production
  • Bosons produced at different angles depending on
    method of production
  • E.g.
  • qval qsea -gt forward
  • qsea qsea -gt transverse

In LHCb boson seen is mostly produced by qval
qsea interactions
In this plot, x is the fraction of proton
momentum and Q is momentum transfer
4
6
Decay channels
10.57 branching ratio
3.37 branching ratio
  • I will investigate muon channels

5
7
Kinematic Parameters
  • Pseudorapidity
  • Rapidity
  • Angular Distributions
  • Transverse mass
  • Invariant mass



Use mcfm-5.1 to generate data A Monte Carlo for
FeMto barn processes (Only to generator level
no detector simulation is carried out)
Theory paper used Parton Distributions and the
LHC W and Z production. The European Physical
Journal C, 14, 133-145 (2000), A.D.Martin,
R.G.Roberts, W.J.Stirling, R.S.Thorne
6
8
Theoretical Rapidity Distributions
Rapidity Distributions for Ws
(Rapidity)
7
9
Rapidity Distributions
(Using CTEQ6L)
8
10
Comparing PDF Sets
  • Different PDF sets have different errors for
    different regions of rapidity
  • Due to different theoretical assumptions
  • Contributions also from data measurements
  • Plots studied
  • pseudorapidity of lepton
  • rapidity of boson or lepton

PDF sets used CTEQ6M (Coordinated
Theoretical-Experimental Project on QCD) and
MRST2001 (Martin, Roberts, Sterling and Thorne)
9
11
Systematic PDF Errors in Rapidity
Errors are from a standard error set devised by
the authors of the PDF set
Errors greater at central rapidities
10
12
Percentage Errors
  • Percentage errors are much lower in central
    regions of rapidity
  • Ratios mean that some uncertainties cancel out so
    overall error is much less

11
13
Conclusions and Further Plans
  • W and Z production and decay theory
    investigated.
  • PDF Sets found to be mostly within 8 of each
    other's predictions.
  • For continuation to thesis,
  • 2.5 fb-1 of data expected (i.e. 11 x 106 Ws and
    6 x 105 Zs)
  • Use LHCb code
  • Look at selection of W/Z candidates
  • Understand trigger and background

12
14
EXTRA PLOTS
15
  • Angular distribution

Theta is the angle of the lepton's direction with
respect to the boost direction in the rest frame
of the W.
16
Acceptances
LHCb acceptance is 1.8 - 4.9 in Pseudorapidity
Acceptance ()
Cross-section (nb)
Acceptance cuts are made on lepton
From generator using cteq6m
108.75 2.61 / -2.94
79.98 2.06 / -2.38
57.78 1.32 / -1.59
17
(No Transcript)
18
Principle Decay Modes
19
Comparing MRST and CTEQ
Plots were made of pull using the following
definition
Overall Plot shown below
  • Width is not equal to 1 so separate plots were
    made for each process to analyse problem.
  • Errors were found not to be independent.

12
20
Conclusions from PDF Sets
Plots made of Pull vs Pseudorapidity for each
process
PDF Sets found to be mostly within 8 of each
other's predictions. Main differences occurred
in ratio plots at high values of rapidity /
pseudorapidity - where there is a lack of data
and theoretical assumptions are made. CTEQ
errors generally larger than MRST assumption of
u-d sea ratio
12
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com