Title: Violence and Aggression between Groups The role of threatened egotism
1Violence and Aggression between GroupsThe role
of threatened egotism
- Roy Baumeister and the roots of evil
- Susan Hollbach
- Bernard Mathieu
- Amélie Mummendey
- Nicole Tausch
- Frank Wieber
2Aggression between Groups
- People acting as members of a group towards
members of an out-group - Not just out-group devaluation
- But intentional harmful behaviour
3 Theories of Group Aggression and Intergroup
Conflict
- Group aggression Focus on the relation between a
group member and the in-group (e.g., norm
enhancement, deindividuation) - dont focus on intergroup relations
- Intergroup theories (SIT, RD, RCT) no explicit
predictions concerning aggressive behaviour
against out-group members
4Where we started
- Transferring the motives or roots of evil from
the interindividual to the intergroup level - - Evil as a means to an end - Idealism- Sadism
(unclear)- Egotism and revenge
5Threatened Egotism
- Baumeister, Smart Boden, 1996
- People are aggressive when
- They have a high self-esteem (not low
self-esteem) - Which is unstable
- And threatened
- Aggression targeted towards the source of threat
- Our QuestionIs there an analogy on the group
level?
6Individual Level
Aggression
Perceived threat to self-esteem
Narcissism (Unstable high self-esteem)
7Group Level (An individual acting as a group
member)
Aggression against out-group member
Unstable high collective self-esteem
Perceived threat
Collective self esteem favourable
self-evaluation based on ones group
membership
8Research Questions1. When?
- A group member should be more likely to aggress
against an out-group member if - High collective self-esteem
- Unstable
- Threatened by an out-group
- Design Stability x Threat/No Threat
- Covariate Collective self-esteem
9Hypotheses for unstable condition
10Example
- IGC context Evil (ingroup) vs. Gender Aloha
(outgroups) - Stability manip. daily evaluation vs. not
- Threat manip. Gender group spreading rumors
about Evil group - DV e.g. noise blaster, computer virus setting,
11Research Questions2. Against whom?
- People will only aggress against members of the
threatening Outgroupbut not against members of a
non-threatening Outgroup. - Design
- Stability
- x
- Threat/No Threat
- x
- Outgroup (Outgroup is source of threat vs. not)
- Covariate Collective self-esteem
12Hypotheses
Threatening Outgroup Any other relevant
group
13Example
- IGC context Evil (ingroup) vs. Gender Aloha
(outgroups) - Stability manip. daily evaluation vs. not
- Threat manip. Gender group spreading rumors
about Evil group - Target manip. gender group vs. aloha group
- DV e.g. noise blaster, computer virus setting,
14Other things we discussed
- The relation between personal and collective
self-esteem - What happens if a person holds low vs. high
personal self-esteem? - Do people with low personal self-esteem who
derive their positive self-evaluation from the
positive evaluation of their group aggress more
when their group is threatened?
15Comparedtowhad?
- Do people with low personal self-esteem who
derive their positive Self-Evaluation from the
positive evaluation of their group aggress more
when their group is threatened compared to -
- people with high personal self-esteem.
16Controversial
- Is the motive to aggress
- to stop the threatening out-group from harming
you? - to control the out-group?
- to restore self-esteem?
- or revenge?? choose between 2 groups (higher
status non aggressive vs. lower status aggressive)
17Other things we discussed
- How many mosquito bites do you have?
- ?Future research should take a closer look on
interspecies aggression
Aggression towards mosquitoes
Perceived threat
Number of mosquito bites