Title: Synthetic lethal analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans posterior embryonic patterning genes identifies conserved genetic interactions
1Synthetic lethal analysis of Caenorhabditis
elegans posteriorembryonic patterning genes
identifies conserved geneticinteractions
- L Ryan Baugh, Joanne C Wen, Andrew A Hill, Donna
K Slonim, Eugene L Brown Craig P Hunter
2The Hunter Lab at Harvard
- Dr. Craig Hunter
- Examining the mechanism behind systemic RNAi
- Studying the master switch pal-1, involved in
specifying the fate of the C blastomere
3Background
- Most genes are not essential (i.e. yeast, flies,
worms) - 2 possible reasons homology (direct
compensation) parallel pathways (indirect
compensation) - Genes with 1 or more homologs less likely to have
loss-of-function phenotype - 2/3 genetic buffering due to homology, implies
large role for parallel pathways
How do you characterize mechanisms of phenotypic
robustness?
4Background Synthetic Lethality
- Developed by Charlie Boone at U of T
- SGA systematic construction of double mutants
- Cross YFG1 to an array of 5000 ? strains
5Synthetic Lethality
- Identify functional relationships between genes
pathways - Shed light on how regulatory networks buffer gene
function - Allows for creation of genetic modules
- Helps identify nodes
6The C Blastomere
7pal-1 specifies regulates C lineage
- PAL-1 target genes
- Identified in microarray screen
- Validated using GFP transcriptional reporters
- Many targets are TFs
RNAi of most PAL-1 targets does not result in a
phenotype. Why? Is there overlapping function?
8Goal of paper
- Identify synthetic interactions between pairs of
PAL-1 targets - Determine if genetic modules exist that buffer
loss of proteins in the pal-1 pathway - Examine the feasibility/reproducibility of double
RNAi experiments
9Experimental Methods
RNAi Soaked strains of worms in dsRNA
(100-1000bp) -Added minimal T7 promoter to PCR
primers -Amplify DNA for in vitro
transcription -dsRNA reannealed by heating
cooling Attempted assembling matrix with only
RNAi -led to variable, inconsistent
results Examined RNAi-treated progeny for
embryonic lethality -converted lethality to
survival to calculate significance of the
interaction
10Statistical Analysis
- lethality converted to survival
- Survival values normalized
- Calculate significance of interactions using
students t test (pgt0.05)
Ho Survival of the double disruption (mutation x
RNAi) equals the product of survivals for each
single disruption
11Results
12Which interactions are significant?
13tbx-8 tbx-9 form a module
tbx-9 (RNAi)
tbx-8 (ok656)
Wild-type
tbx-8 (ok656) tbx-9 (RNAi)
tbx-8 (ok656) tbx-9 (RNAi)
14tbx-8 tbx-9 form a module
- Either disruption on their own 1-5 lethality,
5 of hatchlings display posterior body defects - Double disruption results in 50 lethality
severe defects in hatchlings - tbx-8,9 interactions are conserved in C. briggsae
display similar expression patterns thus
module has likely been conserved
15A muscle differentiation module
- Identified a module around hlh-1
- Detected 5 of 6 interactions (plt0.001) between
hnd-1, hlh-1 and unc-120
- Disruption of any combination of the 3 genes
results in pat - Some symmetry, but not interactions are
symmetrical. Why?
16The hlh-1 module
- hlh-1 is most essential (or most potent) of the 3
TFs in the module - hnd-1 is the least essential (or potent)
17Is this module conserved?
- Interactions between bHLH factors in vertebrates
- Relationship between bHLH proteins MADS-box
regulators (the MEF2 group)
18Criticisms
- No positive controls (i.e. no known interactions
were used) - Why choose soaking and not do a comparison to
feeding injecting? - Why limit the interactions to lethality? Why not
search for enhancement of phenotypes (gro, lva,
lvl etc.) - Didnt confirm results by doing a dihybrid cross
19Gratuitous Political Cartoons
20The People have spoken!