The role of Action Learning as a mechanism for student support and development in the postexperience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The role of Action Learning as a mechanism for student support and development in the postexperience

Description:

The role of Action Learning as a mechanism for student support and development ... Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (Myers & Briggs, revised 1998) Summary ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: pennys6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The role of Action Learning as a mechanism for student support and development in the postexperience


1
The role of Action Learning as a mechanism for
student support and development in the
post-experience professional domain Peter
Stock, Sian Eggert Penny SimpsonBrighton
Business School
2
What is Action Learning (AL)?
  • Founding figure is Reg Revans
  • Learning in a group of about 6 people
  • Based on real / work based issues
  • To bring about change (personal and
    organisational)
  • Taking action cycles of action and reflection
  • Learning based on solving real problems.
  • Facilitated / Self-managed Action Learning
  • PACOR cycle (Bourner, 2005) repeated many times

3
Revans and Bourners views..
  • There can be no learning without action, and no
    (sober and deliberate) action without learning
    (Revans, 1998, p83)
  • Action learning is learning from taking action
    to bring about change in the world
    (Bourner, 2005)

4
Some words associated with AL.
change
challenge
encouragement
engagement
safe
action
learning
commitment
support
questioning
development
5
The PACOR cycle (Bourner, 2005)
6
PACOR cycle
  • Plan
  • Act
  • Consequences
  • Observe
  • Reflect

7
The Principle of Insufficient Mandate
  • Those unable to change themselves cannot change
    what goes on around them (Revans, 1998, p85)

8
How are we using it in the post-experience
professional domain?
  • Chartered Management Institute (CMI) programme
  • Focus here on Level 4 vocational award Diploma
    in Management
  • Learners
  • Almost all practising managers
  • Usually in employment
  • Public and private organisations
  • No staff to 850 staff
  • No budget to millions
  • Gender mix
  • Age band approx mid 20s to 60 years old

9
Why research?
  • Quality assurance
  • Enhance programmes
  • Share knowledge

10
Methodology
  • Questionnaire to all students in attendance at
    last session of programme i.e. (47 out
    of 58 81)
  • 2 separate year cohorts
  • Results analysed
  • Excel for closed questions
  • Content analysis for open questions (2 people to
    code)

11
Key results
  • Had you experienced AL before? Yes 13 No 87
  • Do you consider your action learning set (ALS) to
    be successful?
  • Yes 96 No 4
  • Do you think you will be using AL in the future
  • Yes 70 No 6 Maybe 24

12
Key advantages of self-managed AL
  • Support and motivation 45
  • Flexibility 30
  • Development 26
  • Generation and sharing of ideas 21
  • Problem solving 17

13
Key disadvantages of self-managed AL
  • Focus 36
  • Support, motivation, commitment 32
  • Time 21

14
How operated
  • Agreed ground rules 100
  • Individual progress by questioning 94
  • Scheduled meeting times 89
  • Adhered to ground rules 89
  • Individual issues brought 85
  • Assigned action points 81
  • Assigned roles 64

15
Support
  • Were all members of your group able to be open
    and honest in meetings?
  • Yes 87

16
Development
  • Have you developed your
  • facilitation skills? Yes 85
  • questioning skills? Yes 83
  • Has personal change and development been brought
    about for you and/or other members of your action
    learning set?
  • Yes 83

17
Key forms of communication
  • E-mail to whole group 98
  • E-mail to individuals 94
  • Telephone 66
  • StudentCentral - for information 53
  • StudentCentral - discussion boards 40
  • E-mail group discussions 34

18
Why do you consider your action learning set to
be successful/unsuccessful? (1)
  • Successful
  • our group overall was successful because all
    members gained something from the process and
    used the action learning set to get them through
    the course

CMI Level 4 2003-2004
19
Why do you consider your action learning set to
be successful/unsuccessful? (2)
  • Unsuccessful
  • Too many strong personalities
  • Some members were reluctant to stick to rules

CMI Level 4 2003-2004
CMI Level 4 2003-2004
20
What is a successful action learning set?
  • individuals with a common goal of learning and
    self-development. Ability to be open regarding
    course/work issues that can be shared and learned
    from
  • we made sure we always had a laugh but were
    committed always

CMI Level 4 2003-2004
CMI Level 4 2003-2004
21
What is a successful action learning set?
  • a group of individuals bonding and building team
    spirit with a view to learning and developing
    both as a group and individuals

CMI Level 4 2004-2005
22
ImplicationsAL for programmes
  • Clear guidance about Action Learning
  • Skills input
  • Facilitation
  • Questioning (L P Q)
  • Importance of keeping students focused

23
Further research
  • Continue longitudinal study
  • Effectiveness of AL with
  • Belbin team roles (1981, 1993)
  • Learning style (Honey Mumford 1986)
  • Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (Myers
    Briggs, revised 1998)

24
Summary
  • people within ALS go away with a better
    understanding of how to deal with work
    issues/assignment issues/any issue

CMI Level 4 2004-2005
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com