Are there really two types of h index variants A validation study by using molecular life sciences d - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Are there really two types of h index variants A validation study by using molecular life sciences d

Description:

... of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO, http://www. ... 3,351 papers (articles, letters, notes, and reviews) published prior to application ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: artu49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Are there really two types of h index variants A validation study by using molecular life sciences d


1
Are there really two types of h index variants? A
validation study by using molecular life sciences
data
  • Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel,
    Gerlind Wallon, Anna Ledin

2
h index
  • h index as a criterion to quantify the scientific
    output of a single researcher
  • A scientist has index h if h of his or her Np
    papers have at least h citations each and the
    other (Np - h) papers have h citations each
    (Hirsch, 2005, p. 16569)

3
Advantages of the h index
  • It gives a robust estimate of the broad impact of
    a scientists cumulative research contributions
  • It combines number of publications and citation
    counts in a balanced way

4
Disadvantages of the h index
  • It is only weakly sensitive to the number of
    citations received by single publications
  • It is highly dependent upon a scientists number
    of years of active research
  • It can only rise and cannot decline
  • Some new Hirsch-type indices have been proposed

5
Definitions of the h index and its variants
6
Statistical analysis
  • Intercorrelational structure using factor
    analysis
  • The factor analysis provides information on the
    dimensionality of the structure of the
    dependencies in a data set
  • We examined whether the indices are based on a
    single factor (such as a research performance
    dimension) or whether there are several factors
    involved

7
The data set for the investigation of the indices
  • Committee peer review for awarding long-term
    fellowships to post-doctoral researchers as
    practiced by the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
    (B.I.F., www.bifonds.de)
  • 414 post-doctoral applicants (64 approved and 350
    rejected) from the years 1990 to 1995
  • 1,586 papers published previous to applying for
    the fellowship (publication window 1986 - 1994)
  • The papers received a total of 60,882 citations
    (according to the Science Citation Index)
    (citation window from year of publication to the
    end of 2001)

8
Box plots of the nine logarithmic indices
calculated for the B.I.F. applicants with the
distribution of data and the Gaussian bell curve
9
Varimax rotated loading matrix of a ML factor
analysis for nine log transformed indices (n414)
10
Varimax rotated loading matrix of a ML factor
analysis for 11 log transformed indices or
standard bibliometric measures (n414)
11
First conclusions
  • There are two types of indices/ measures
  • The one type of indices/ measures (for example h
    index and g index) describe the most productive
    core of the output of a scientist and tell us the
    number of papers in the core
  • The other indices/ measures (for example a index
    and m index) depict the impact of the papers in
    the core
  • There is an empirical incremental contribution
    with the variants that depict the impact of the
    papers in the productive core

12
Paper
  • Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H.-D. (2008).
    Are there better indices for evaluation purposes
    than the h index? A comparison of nine different
    variants of the h index using data from
    biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for
    Information Science and Technology, 59(5),
    830-837

13
The data set for the validation of the two-factor
solution
  • 693 applicants to the Long-Term Fellowship
    programme of the European Molecular Biology
    Organization (EMBO, http//www.embo.org/) from
    the year 1998
  • The programme has gained an excellent reputation
  • 3,351 papers (articles, letters, notes, and
    reviews) published prior to application(publicati
    on window 1993 1998)
  • The papers received an average of 45 citations
    (according to the Science Citation Index)
    (citation window from year of publication until
    2006)

14
Statistical analysis
  • Two further indices hm index and maxprod.
  • Eleven indices were included in the factor
    analysis
  • ML Factor Analysis
  • Logarithmized index values

15
Varimax rotated loading matrix of a ML factor
analysis for eleven log transformed indices
(n693)
16
Varimax rotated loading matrix of a ML factor
analysis for 13 log transformed indices or
standard bibliometric measures (n693)
17
Second conclusions
  • There are two types of indices
  • Both index types can complement each other very
    well
  • An empirical incremental contribution associated
    with the variants that depict the impact of the
    papers in the productive core
  • We propose the use of any pair of indices as a
    meaningful indicator for comparing scientists
    one index relates to the number and the other to
    the impact of the papers in the productive core
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com