2nd EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

2nd EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise

Description:

2nd EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise. Trento, 3 ... 25% gives them voice in board of directors. 18% information and consultation of employees ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: wimvan7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2nd EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise


1
2nd EMES International Conference on Social
Enterprise Trento, 3 July 2009 Co-operative
stakeholders Who counts in co-operatives, and
how? Dr. Caroline Gijselinckx Cera Centre for
Co-operative Entrepreneurship Higher Institute of
Labour Studies Catholic University of Leuven

2
Outline
  • Research questions and evidence
  • Stakeholder theory
  • Whose stakes are taken into account and how, in
    co-operatives ?
  • theoretically
  • empirical evidence on belgian co-operatives
  • Challenges and new avenues for stakeholder
    involvement in cooperatives

3
Research questions
  • Theory
  • Constitution of co-operatives
  • - institutionalization of member dialogue and
    participation - natural inclination toward
    stakeholder management, albeit not
  • necessarily multi-stakeholder management
  • Legal frameworks
  • Stimulating multi-stakeholder co-operatives
  • Questions
  • Empirical evidence who counts in
    co-operatives, and how?
  • Stakeholder models among co-operatives?

4
Empirical evidence
From Belgium (), gathered through Survey on
co-operatives (2006, N175) In-depth interviews
(2005, N16) Focus groups (2008, N10 and 9
participants respectively) () Co-operatives
in Belgium 40 000 companies with legal form of
co-operative 558 accredited by National Council
of Co-operatives (April, 2008) asked for an
accreditation meeting 5 criteria -
voluntary membership - equal voting rights
for all members or restriction of voting
rights at general assembly - restricted
dividend (max. 6) - patronage dividend for
members pro rata transactions
5
Stakeholder theory
  • The concept of stakeholder
  • Refers to a claimant toward whom an organization
    has fiduciary
  • responsibility (Bryson, 2003)
  • Those individuals or groups that are influenced
    by or have in influence on the activities of an
    organization (Freeman, 1984)
  • Identification and typification of stakeholders
  • internal and external stakeholders (Rousseau
    Shperling, 2003)
  • stakeholders by design and natural
    stakeholders (Tirole, 2001)
  • typology of stakeholders according to attributes
    power, legitimacy,
  • urgence (Mitchell, Agle Wood, 1997)
  • basic structure of stakeholder model according to
    elements influencing the outcome and components
    of the relationship between an organization and
    its stakeholders (Jonker Foster, 2002)
  • Strong and weak versions of stakeholder
    management (Leys, Van Opstal Gijselinckx, 2009)

6
Who counts in co-operatives and how?
  • THEORETICALLY
  • In virtue of specific constitution of a
    co-operative stakeholder dialogue
  • is institutionalized in co-operatives
  • Co-operatives are member-organizations
  • Members involvement and participation in
    governance
  • Co-operative members have a double identity user
    and owner
  • Members are both dominant and ultimate
    stakeholder (cf. Mitchell,
  • Agle Wood, 1997)
  • Members are both stakeholder by design and
    natural stakeholder
  • (cf. Tirole, 2003)
  • Potential for strong version of stakeholder
    management, but not
  • necessarily so
  • Spectrum of stakeholder involvement in
    co-operatives,
  • Inspired by the spectrum of levels of public
    participation (International Association for
    Public Participation)
  • information consultation involvement
    collaboration empowerment

7
Who counts in co-operatives and how?
Spectrum of stakeholder involvement in
co-operatives
strong
weak
8
Who counts in co-operatives and how?
  • EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE from Belgium
  • Member involvement
  • core characteristic of a cooperative
  • importance of sufficient, clear and transparant
    information
  • development of member advantages
  • democratic member participation
  • - In general assembly, board of directors, other
    channels of
  • participation
  • - Tendency the bigger the co-operative, the
    lesser the active
  • participation
  • - Decentralized member participation in big
    cooperatives
  • - Key-members with key position appointed in
    decision making
  • founding members
  • social organizations

9
Who counts in co-operatives and how?
  • Employees
  • 50 gives them voice in general assembly
  • 25 gives them voice in board of directors
  • 18 information and consultation of employees
  • In social purpose companies workers
    participation is required, but
  • experienced to be difficult to organize
  • Financiers
  • 26 invites them for the general assembly
  • 17 invites them for meetings of the board of
    directors
  • Other stakeholders mentioned as such
  • Other co-operative enterprises (mentioned by 30
    of cooperatives in survey)
  • Social organizations (mentioned by 29 of
    co-operatives surveyed)
  • Other non-co-operative enterprises (mentioned by
    24 of co-operative surveyed)
  • Trade unions (16)
  • Governments and local governments (14)

10
Who counts in co-operatives and how?
  • Corporate social responsibility in co-operatives
  • Item list of PASO survey in Flanders used in
    survey on accredited
  • cooperatives
  • More than 70 of the co-operative employers take
    one or more measures with respect to health and
    safety at work, workers participation and
    work-family life balance
  • 47 of co-operatives surveyed takes measures with
    respect to
  • transparancy, support of social projects,
    support of cultural projects, respect for local
    community and culture, public health and safety,
    North-South relationships
  • 39 of co-operatives surveyed takes measures with
    respect to the
  • protection or preservation of the environment
    (most importantly waste
  • recycling)
  • Tendency the bigger the co-operative, the more
    measures (under
  • control for activity sector and
    employer/non-employer status)
  • Half of those cooperatives who do not take any of
    these measures are
  • small machingering rings

11
Who counts in co-operatives and how?
  • Socialization of profit
  • by 11 of co-operatives in survey (all but 1
    in service sector)
  • sponsoring (72)
  • donations (44)
  • other methods mentioned
  • - price reductions for disadvantaged
    people,
  • - special awards for employees,
  • - patronage dividend for non-member
    customers,
  • - making risk social investements with a
    low interest rate

12
Who counts in co-operatives and how?
  • General pattern
  • model 1 seems to be predominant
  • some co-operatives seem to be moving towards
    models 2 and 3
  • Members as primary stakeholders
  • Potential for strong form of multi-stakeholdership
    (multiple types of members)
  • Single type member co-operative
  • but co-operatives historically and
    pragmatically are single member
  • type organizations therefore predominance of
    model 1
  • Multiple type member co-operatives
  • - employees difficult realization of
    participation in other types of co-
  • operatives than worker co-operatives (also
    when obliged in social purpose companies)
  • - re-discovery of co-operative model by
    individuals as well as social
  • movements and social organizations/movements
  • - preliminary attempts to set up
    multi-stakeholder-member co-operatives
  • most importantly in social services and
    sustainable energy)

13
Who counts in co-operatives and how?
  • CHALLENGES
  • With respect to controlling stakeholders
    (members)
  • For all types of stakeholder models
  • Tendency of hampering of member and stakeholder
    management in
  • professional boards (consisting of external
    directors)
  • - can be solved by requisting that board members
    become members of
  • the co-operative and establishing mixed
    boards
  • For multiple stakeholder-member model
  • Deadlocks in decision making
  • Conflicting interests
  • In case of one member one vote principle and
    multiple types of
  • members tendency of the largest category to
    dominate the organization
  • - can be solved by giving certain types of
    members a stronger voice
  • With respect to non-controlling stakeholders
    (non-members)
  • protection of non-controlling stakeholders/non-mem
    bers
  • - through flat claims and exit options
  • - through structural linkage with social
    organizations/movements

14
  • CONTACT
  • Dr. Caroline Gijselinckx
  • Research Manager Civil Society and Social Economy
    Research Group
  • Coordinator Cera Centre for Co-operative
    Entrepreneurship
  • HIVA K.U.Leuven
  • Parkstraat 47
  • 3000 Leuven
  • Belgium
  • Tel. 00 32 16 32 33 28
  • Fax 00 32 16 32 33 44
  • www.cooperatiefondernemen.be
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com