Stereotyping, Prejudice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Stereotyping, Prejudice

Description:

Insults, raids, food fights, etc. In-group favoritism. Boys guessed their fellows found more beans. Multi-stage process. Stage 3: Superordinate goals ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: jeffrey97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stereotyping, Prejudice


1
Stereotyping, PrejudiceDiscrimination
  • June 27th

2
Defining our terms
  • Stereotypes Beliefs about members of a group
  • Book says its about traits I respectfully
    disagree
  • This is the cognitive part of an attitude towards
    a group its members
  • Prejudice negative attitude/affective response
    toward a group and those perceived as members of
    that group
  • This is the affective part of a negative attitude
    towards a group its members
  • Discrimination unfair treatment of members of a
    group based on their perceived membership in that
    group.
  • This is the behavioral part of a negative
    attitude towards a group its members.

These are BAD!
These are BAD!!
3
Do stereotypes have to be bad?
  • Any thoughts on this?
  • I have some very useful stereotypes!
  • Jehovahs Witnesses Christian Scientists do not
    want blood transfusions
  • Muslims Jews dont eat pork
  • Scandinavians are easily sunburned
  • Americans only speak English
  • None of these are necessarily negative

4
Do stereotypes have to be inaccurate?
  • Lee Jussim (and a few others) argues that while
    individuating information is most important,
    stereotypes tend to have some accuracy
  • Individuating information is information specific
    to the individual, not group membership.
  • Any accurate stereotypes?
  • South Asians study medicine
  • Students are bad drivers
  • Italians eat a lot of pasta
  • Stereotypes are not necessarily accurate

5
American History
  • S, P, D research has focused on majority S, P,
    D regarding minorities
  • Racism
  • Because S.P. is mostly American, most of this
    work is how White European-Americans regard Black
    African-Americans
  • Much applies well to other majority-minority or
    inter-group situations
  • Inter - between
  • Intra - within

6
A Change in Racism
  • After civil rights movement (heyday) overt racism
    was no longer sanctioned.
  • Does that mean no one is racist anymore?
  • Modern Racism
  • prejudice directed at other racial groups that
    exists alongside a rejection of explicitly racist
    beliefs
  • modern racists are most likely to discriminate
    when the action isnt easily attributable to
    racism

7
Benevolent Sexism Racism
  • Sometimes peoples stereotypes have benevolent
    aspects
  • This can get a little murky when is a man who
    thinks he should pay for dinner a sexist?
  • Positive attitude toward beliefs about members
    of a group
  • This has been most often studied with men who
    love women
  • Chivalrous behavior and attitudes often coincide
    with negative attitude toward individuals who
    dont play traditional role

8
Measuring Implicit Attitudes
  • As mentioned previously, we sometimes will not or
    can not report our attitudes
  • RT measures allow us to measure sensitive
    attitudes
  • Implicit association task
  • Saw in class
  • Priming task

9
Where it all comes from
  • There are 3 approaches to understanding the basis
    of inter-group phenomena, all of which are valid

  • Economic stereotyping, prejudice, and
    discrimination arise out of competition for
    limited resources
  • Motivational people are motivated by something
    (such as a drive for positive self-esteem) to
    boost their own group relative to others
  • Cognitive Stereotyping arises through
    unemotional cognitive mechanisms to compensate
    for lack of cognitive resources to deal with a
    complex world

10
Economic Perspective
  • Realistic Group Conflict Theory
  • group conflict, prejudice, and discrimination are
    likely to arise over competition between groups
    for limited desired resources
  • Example Arab-Israeli conflict is over land
  • Allentown, PA skinheads
  • During conflict there is heightened
    ethnocentrism
  • Belief in the superiority of ones own (ethnic)
    group

11
Robbers Cave Study
  • Muzafer Sherif (the autokinetic effect guy)
    colleagues took 22 boys to a camp to study
    inter-group processes
  • None of them knew each other before
  • There were no particular differences between the
    boys
  • Divided into 2 groups of 11, bussed in
    separately

12
Multi-stage process
  • Phase 1 intragroup activities
  • Did things as a group to foster cohesiveness,
    unaware of other groups presence
  • Phase 2 intergroup competition
  • Tournament members of winning team would get
    medals and pocketknives, losers nothing
  • Competition led to conflict
  • Insults, raids, food fights, etc.
  • In-group favoritism
  • Boys guessed their fellows found more beans

13
Multi-stage process
  • Stage 3 Superordinate goals
  • goals that transcend the interests of one
    individual group, and that can be achieved more
    readily by two or more groups working together
  • When groups work on something they need each
    other to achieve, S, P, D are reduced
  • Mere intergroup contact is not enough
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com