Prejudice and Stereotyping Chapter 13 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Prejudice and Stereotyping Chapter 13

Description:

When primed subliminally, all view Donald as consistent with stereotype. When primed consciously, only high prejudice view Donald as consistent with stereotype ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:6359
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: lne4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prejudice and Stereotyping Chapter 13


1
Prejudice and Stereotyping (Chapter 13)
2
Announcements!
  • Exam 2 is one week away (Thurs. Oct. 25th )!
    This exam covers Chapters 3-6, and 13.
  • Pick up study guide in class
  • Review session for exam will be held next week
    exact time and location TBA
  • Interested in helping to conduct research on
    stereotyping and prejudice? Contact Dr. Czopp
  • E-mail Alexander.Czopp_at_utoledo.edu

3
Definitions
  • Prejudice (affective component) An unjustifiable
    negative feeling or emotional response toward a
    group and its individual members.

4
Definitions
  • Stereotypes (cognitive component) Beliefs about
    the personal attributes of a group of people.
  • Not always negative

5
Definitions
  • Discrimination (behavioral component) actively
    mistreating or neglecting people because of their
    group membership.

6
What are the sources of prejudice?
  • How can the social context give rise to
    prejudice?
  • Two types of explanations
  • Motivational
  • Cognitive

7
What are the sources of prejudice?
  • Motivational Source we engage in prejudice,
    stereotyping and discrimination to feel good
    about oneself and to gain benefits for ones group

8
Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
  • We group people into two categories
  • Ingroup - Us - a group who shares a sense of
    belonging a common identity.
  • Outgroup - Them - a group perceived as
    distinctively apart from the ingroup.

9
Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
  • Tajfel (1970) Social Identity Theory
  • Part of our identity comes from our group
    memberships (social identity)
  • our social identity can influence our
    self-esteem
  • This can lead to...
  • Ingroup bias - the tendency to favor ones own
    group (often at the expense of another group)

10
Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
  • Minimal group paradigm
  • Klee vs. Kandinsky study
  • Overestimater vs. underestimater study
  • What if you personally wont benefit? Still favor
    ingroup
  • We will take fewer resources just to beat the
    outgroup!

11
Minimal Group Paradigm
  • Conclusion People favor the ingroup no matter
    how trivial the distinction between groups!
  • No cohesion
  • No history
  • No dislike

12
Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
  • Realistic group conflict theory prejudice
    results from real competition between groups for
    limited resources
  • Justifies why my group has more abundant
    resources (dissonance)
  • Results from feeling that outgroup is denying
    us resources
  • E.g., lynchings and economic conditions

13
Motivational Source Feeling good and gaining
benefits
  • Scapegoat Theory when self-esteem is threatened,
    people are more likely to derogate outgroup
    members
  • Prejudice as Self-Esteem Boost Study
  • Participants given positive or negative feedback
    on performance
  • In unrelated study, asked to evaluate Jewish or
    Italian woman as job applicant

14
Prejudice as Self-Esteem Boost
15
What are the sources of prejudice?
  • Cognitive source Stereotyping is a cognitive
    shortcut used to understanding others.

16
Cognitive source The Dark Side of Heuristics
  • Outgroup homogeneity effect - perception of
    outgroup members as being very similar to one
    another and ingroup members as being unique
  • They are all alike, were diverse.

17
Cognitive source The Dark Side of Heuristics
  • Own race bias the tendency for people to more
    accurately recognize faces of their own race.
  • They all look alike
  • Faces in line-up study
  • Why does this happen? Race is salient

18
Dissociation Model of Prejudice (Devine, 1989)
  • Takes both P and E into account
  • Two-step model of prejudice
  • Step 1 - Automatic process stereotypes are
    automatically activated
  • Step 2 - Controlled process the application of
    the stereotype can be controlled. The
    non-prejudiced stop correct the response

19
Dissociation Model of Prejudice (Devine, 1989)
  • Donald studies
  • When primed subliminally, all view Donald as
    consistent with stereotype
  • When primed consciously, only high prejudice view
    Donald as consistent with stereotype
  • Implication we can only override the stereotype
    if we have the cognitive resources to do it!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com