Darwins Practical Joke: The Evolutionary Bases of Resistance to Evolution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Darwins Practical Joke: The Evolutionary Bases of Resistance to Evolution

Description:

This project extends previous work on the teaching of evolution as a component ... of evolution and/or to inculcate creationism or intelligent design are in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: JimC57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Darwins Practical Joke: The Evolutionary Bases of Resistance to Evolution


1
Darwins Practical JokeThe Evolutionary Bases
of Resistance to Evolution
  • Jim Chen
  • University of Minnesota Law School
  • Society for the Evolutionary Analysis of Law
  • 2006 Scholarship Roundtable
  • Vanderbilt University Law School
  • April 2, 2006

2
Appreciating evolution holds the key to sound
environmental policy
  • This project extends previous work on the
    teaching of evolution as a component of
    biodiversity policy. Legal Mythmaking in a Time
    of Mass Extinctions, 29 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 279
    (2005), http//papers.ssrn.com/abstract 770976
  • What is the most significant problem facing the
    world?
  • How can we incorporate an environmental ethic
    into core questions of governance?
  • Does resistance evolution matter to law?
  • Might that resistance, perversely enough, be a
    product of adaptive responses to natural
    selection?

3
Vast segments of American society reject evolution
  • Two-thirds of the public and one-third of public
    school biology teachers express some sympathy for
    teaching alternatives to evolution
  • Evolution has few adherents (Kristof, NYT 2003)
  • Virgin birth of Jesus 83
  • Satan 68
  • Evolution 28
  • G.W. Bush the jury is still out (March 2005)
  • Apocalypse now? 40 of Americans believe that
    the world will end supernaturally
  • Result a country that is truly Left Behind

4
Public rejection of evolution cripples
environmental law
  • Efforts to ban the teaching of evolution and/or
    to inculcate creationism or intelligent design
    are in their ninth decade and appear to be
    escalating
  • Scopes (1925)
  • Epperson v, Arkansas (1968)
  • McLean v. Arkansas Bd. of Educ. (1982)
  • Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)
  • Freiler v. Tangipahoa Parish (2000) (Scalia
    dissent)
  • Dover School Bd. (2005)
  • Some evangelical groups have used the Noah story
    to advocate conservation (Nagle 1998)

5
Does natural selection predispose humans against
evolutionary explanations?
  • Religion is human behavior. Accordingly, its
    origins and significance can be illuminated by
    evolutionary analysis
  • Dennett, Breaking the Spell (2006)
  • Barrett, Why Would Anyone Believe in God? (2004)
  • Boyer, Religion Explained (2001)
  • Anderson, Ecologies of the Heart (1996)
  • Guthrie, Faces in the Clouds (1993)
  • Religion is continuous with other systems of
    thought and action such as science, art, and
    common sense (Guthrie)
  • Religious belief is adaptive
  • A creationist account of origins (such as the
    Abrahamic narrative) seems singularly appealing
    to the adapted mind

6
Religion as the product of an agency detection
device
  • Humans systematically interpret ambiguous
    evidence as being caused by a living agent
  • Not what went bump in the night, but who
  • This cognitive bias prompts proactive responses
    to threats and opportunities relating to survival
    and/or reproduction
  • Agency detection is a variant of Pascals wager
  • Responding as if an agent existed may ensure
    survival or secure a reproductive opportunity
  • The only downside is the cost of the response
  • Religion condenses a wide range of unseen agents
    into an anthropomorphic diety

7
Indirect evidence of religion as adaptive behavior
  • Religion appears to be a human universal
  • Humans are religious across time and space
  • Efforts to suppress religion have failed, often
    spectacularly
  • Active atheism demands extraordinary effort
  • Components of agency detection (face, animal,
    artifact identification) apparently emerge very
    early in childhood
  • Women are systematically more involved in and
    committed to religion than are men
  • Very stable sexual asymmetry (Paloutzian 1996)

8
Biological intelligence is almost certainly
adaptive
  • Extensive evidence of biophilia/biophobia
    (Wilson)
  • Tree-studded promontories overlooking water
  • Infants and infant-like artifacts are cute
  • Spiders and darkness and snakes, oh my
  • Naturalist intelligence flourishes within a
    system of multiple intelligences (Gardner)
  • Not all manifestations of intelligence reflect
    adaptation (Pinker)
  • Human speech is universal writing is not
  • Phonetic writing is a powerful meme, but it
    assuredly is not universal, adaptive behavior
  • Biology is adaptive. Is evolutionary reasoning?

9
Biology inspires emotions, perhaps even religious
belief
  • Humans code ecological knowledge in religious
    terms (Anderson 1996 see also Rappaport 1971
    Slovic 2000)
  • One scientific response to creationism is to
    offer natural history as the real story of
    origins (Ursula Goodenough 2001, Wilson 2002,
    Takacs 1996, Dobzhansky 1973)
  • How much environmental policymaking is
    constrained or driven by emotion?

10
Doing what comes naturally
  • Sakes alive I mastered it when I was five
    (Pinker 1994)
  • Children intuitively embrace many Abrahamic
    theological tenets, almost to the point of
    favoring these faiths (Barrett Richert 2003)
  • Omniscient, superperceptive, immortal,
    superpowerful creator
  • Children distinguish between natural and
    human-made things (Petrovich 1997)
  • Children ascribe natural origins to theistic
    rather than human agency (Petrovich 1999)
  • Creationism trounces evolution, human invention,
    and mere emergence among children (Evans 2001)
  • Children see living and nonliving things as
    purposeful, and religion may merely confirm this
    instinct (Keleman 1999)

11
Against all odds the unavoidable offensiveness
of randomness
  • Evolution reflects Ecclesiastes, not Genesis
    time and chance happen to them all
  • Humans expect virtue to be rewarded and vice to
    be punished (Lerner Miller 1978)
  • Right-and-wrong narratives dominate popular
    understandings of science, religion, and art
  • Spencer coopted Darwin into survival of the
    fittest and made nonextinction normative
  • Amoral denouements are deeply dissatisfying

12
Chance and choice, wisdom and responsibility
  • W.J. Bryan Destiny is not a question of chance.
    Destiny is a question of choice.
  • Resistance to evolution transcends ideology
  • Enemies left
  • Standard social science models tabula rasa
  • Fear of racial, sexual determinism
  • Enemies right
  • Achilles Odysseus Calvinism Catechism
  • You will know the truth, and the truth will make
    you free

13
Thank You
  • Jim Chen
  • University of Minnesota Law School
  • chenx064_at_maroon.tc.umn.edu
  • 612-625-4839
  • http//www.law.umn.edu/FacultyProfiles/ChenJ.htm
  • http//ssrn.com/author68651
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com