Title: Darwins Practical Joke: The Evolutionary Bases of Resistance to Evolution
1Darwins Practical JokeThe Evolutionary Bases
of Resistance to Evolution
- Jim Chen
- University of Minnesota Law School
- Society for the Evolutionary Analysis of Law
- 2006 Scholarship Roundtable
- Vanderbilt University Law School
- April 2, 2006
2Appreciating evolution holds the key to sound
environmental policy
- This project extends previous work on the
teaching of evolution as a component of
biodiversity policy. Legal Mythmaking in a Time
of Mass Extinctions, 29 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 279
(2005), http//papers.ssrn.com/abstract 770976 - What is the most significant problem facing the
world? - How can we incorporate an environmental ethic
into core questions of governance? - Does resistance evolution matter to law?
- Might that resistance, perversely enough, be a
product of adaptive responses to natural
selection?
3Vast segments of American society reject evolution
- Two-thirds of the public and one-third of public
school biology teachers express some sympathy for
teaching alternatives to evolution - Evolution has few adherents (Kristof, NYT 2003)
- Virgin birth of Jesus 83
- Satan 68
- Evolution 28
- G.W. Bush the jury is still out (March 2005)
- Apocalypse now? 40 of Americans believe that
the world will end supernaturally - Result a country that is truly Left Behind
4Public rejection of evolution cripples
environmental law
- Efforts to ban the teaching of evolution and/or
to inculcate creationism or intelligent design
are in their ninth decade and appear to be
escalating - Scopes (1925)
- Epperson v, Arkansas (1968)
- McLean v. Arkansas Bd. of Educ. (1982)
- Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)
- Freiler v. Tangipahoa Parish (2000) (Scalia
dissent) - Dover School Bd. (2005)
- Some evangelical groups have used the Noah story
to advocate conservation (Nagle 1998)
5Does natural selection predispose humans against
evolutionary explanations?
- Religion is human behavior. Accordingly, its
origins and significance can be illuminated by
evolutionary analysis - Dennett, Breaking the Spell (2006)
- Barrett, Why Would Anyone Believe in God? (2004)
- Boyer, Religion Explained (2001)
- Anderson, Ecologies of the Heart (1996)
- Guthrie, Faces in the Clouds (1993)
- Religion is continuous with other systems of
thought and action such as science, art, and
common sense (Guthrie) - Religious belief is adaptive
- A creationist account of origins (such as the
Abrahamic narrative) seems singularly appealing
to the adapted mind
6Religion as the product of an agency detection
device
- Humans systematically interpret ambiguous
evidence as being caused by a living agent - Not what went bump in the night, but who
- This cognitive bias prompts proactive responses
to threats and opportunities relating to survival
and/or reproduction - Agency detection is a variant of Pascals wager
- Responding as if an agent existed may ensure
survival or secure a reproductive opportunity - The only downside is the cost of the response
- Religion condenses a wide range of unseen agents
into an anthropomorphic diety
7Indirect evidence of religion as adaptive behavior
- Religion appears to be a human universal
- Humans are religious across time and space
- Efforts to suppress religion have failed, often
spectacularly - Active atheism demands extraordinary effort
- Components of agency detection (face, animal,
artifact identification) apparently emerge very
early in childhood - Women are systematically more involved in and
committed to religion than are men - Very stable sexual asymmetry (Paloutzian 1996)
8Biological intelligence is almost certainly
adaptive
- Extensive evidence of biophilia/biophobia
(Wilson) - Tree-studded promontories overlooking water
- Infants and infant-like artifacts are cute
- Spiders and darkness and snakes, oh my
- Naturalist intelligence flourishes within a
system of multiple intelligences (Gardner) - Not all manifestations of intelligence reflect
adaptation (Pinker) - Human speech is universal writing is not
- Phonetic writing is a powerful meme, but it
assuredly is not universal, adaptive behavior - Biology is adaptive. Is evolutionary reasoning?
9Biology inspires emotions, perhaps even religious
belief
- Humans code ecological knowledge in religious
terms (Anderson 1996 see also Rappaport 1971
Slovic 2000) - One scientific response to creationism is to
offer natural history as the real story of
origins (Ursula Goodenough 2001, Wilson 2002,
Takacs 1996, Dobzhansky 1973) - How much environmental policymaking is
constrained or driven by emotion?
10Doing what comes naturally
- Sakes alive I mastered it when I was five
(Pinker 1994) - Children intuitively embrace many Abrahamic
theological tenets, almost to the point of
favoring these faiths (Barrett Richert 2003) - Omniscient, superperceptive, immortal,
superpowerful creator - Children distinguish between natural and
human-made things (Petrovich 1997) - Children ascribe natural origins to theistic
rather than human agency (Petrovich 1999) - Creationism trounces evolution, human invention,
and mere emergence among children (Evans 2001) - Children see living and nonliving things as
purposeful, and religion may merely confirm this
instinct (Keleman 1999)
11Against all odds the unavoidable offensiveness
of randomness
- Evolution reflects Ecclesiastes, not Genesis
time and chance happen to them all - Humans expect virtue to be rewarded and vice to
be punished (Lerner Miller 1978) - Right-and-wrong narratives dominate popular
understandings of science, religion, and art - Spencer coopted Darwin into survival of the
fittest and made nonextinction normative - Amoral denouements are deeply dissatisfying
12Chance and choice, wisdom and responsibility
- W.J. Bryan Destiny is not a question of chance.
Destiny is a question of choice. - Resistance to evolution transcends ideology
- Enemies left
- Standard social science models tabula rasa
- Fear of racial, sexual determinism
- Enemies right
- Achilles Odysseus Calvinism Catechism
- You will know the truth, and the truth will make
you free
13Thank You
- Jim Chen
- University of Minnesota Law School
- chenx064_at_maroon.tc.umn.edu
- 612-625-4839
- http//www.law.umn.edu/FacultyProfiles/ChenJ.htm
- http//ssrn.com/author68651