CEGR 4234 5234 Hazardous Waste Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

CEGR 4234 5234 Hazardous Waste Management

Description:

Permits required for treatment, storage and disposal facilities (TSDFs) ... (Photo courtesy. EPA.) FIGURE 2-7. Activity schematic at a Superfund site. Cleanup ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: dani61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CEGR 4234 5234 Hazardous Waste Management


1
CEGR 4234 / 5234Hazardous Waste Management
  • 9/5/06

2
Legal Framework
  • Hazardous Waste Management is generally a
    regulatory-driven activity
  • Federal
  • State
  • Local
  • Court decisions
  • Regulations change with time and space
  • Designs should be protective of human health and
    the environment

3
FIGURE 2-1 Growth of environmental laws in the
United States.
4
FIGURE 2-2
Changes to U.S. environmental
regulations (federal and state).
5
FIGURE 2-3
EPAs short-term agenda458
regulations under development.
6
Hierarchy of Lawin order
  • U.S. Constitution
  • International Treaties consider Kyoto Protocol
  • Federal Statutes
  • Federal Regulations
  • State Statutes (e.g. NC General Statutes,
    http//www.ncleg.net/statutes/statutes.asp)
  • State Regulations (e.g. 15A NCAC 01C .0101 (DENR
    Procedures, Rules)
  • Local (city/county) laws, ordinances and
    regulations
  • Case Lawseparate hierarchy

7
Federal Statutes
  • Basis for all major U.S. Environmental Laws
  • Designations
  • Bills in Congress, e.g., S 101, HR 1025
  • Pass both houses, signed by President, e.g.
    PL94-580 (Public Law, 94th Congress)
  • All laws are then assembled into a master
    document United States Code
  • RCRA 42 USC 6901 et seq.
  • Title 42 of the U.S. Code, Section 6901 and the
    following sections

8
Federal Regulations
  • Federal Statutes Laws are often vague
  • Details left to agencies (e.g. EPA)
  • These details manifest as regulations
  • For example, SO2 emissions shall be reduced by
    50
  • Per plant? Per Company? By what technique? How
    will it be measured?
  • Code of Federal Regulations
  • 40 CFR 261 Title 40 (Protection of the
    Environment), part 261 (Hazardous Waste)

9
State Laws/Regulations
  • Similar pattern
  • Promulgating and proposing, codifying, etc.
  • General Statutes Laws
  • North Carolina Register Regulations
  • Not always over-ruled by federal government
  • Numerous exceptions according to states
  • Some laws delegated
  • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
    (NPDES, Clean Water Act)
  • Some laws not delegated
  • CERCLA
  • However, passage of additional, similar laws is
    possible
  • Compare difference in Coal Combustion Products

10
Local City/County Laws, etc.
  • Great variability from location
  • Consider Permitting efforts in Cambridge, MA
    versus Georgia

11
Case Law
  • Legislative bodies develop laws
  • Courts decide on interpretation of law when
    questioned
  • Language regarding need for EIS
  • major federal actions significantly impacting
    the quality of the environment
  • An EIS takes time and money.lawsuits challenge
    individual words in a law
  • Legal precedents
  • Courts of equal or lesser authority often accept
    previous rulings

12
U.S. Judicial System
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Constitutionality, legal instability
  • Federal Court of Appeals (circuit courts)
  • Federal District Courts
  • Vast majority of case law formed here
  • State Courts
  • Administrative Courts

13
Legal Research
  • Process of identifying issue and applicable law

Is it Hazardous?
Primary Source of Law RCRA
Operating Location Does State have Authority?
Yes
No
Review Code of Federal Regulations (existing) and
Federal Register (updates)
Review State Statutes, Regulations
Case Law
14
RCRA
  • Currently Generated Waste
  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
    (RCRA)
  • Subtitle C, cradle to grave tracking of waste
  • Classifications/definitions established
  • See page 48 of text
  • Standards for Disposal left to EPA (i.e., through
    rules/regulations)
  • Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (to RCRA)
    (HSWA) of 1984, minimal technical requirements
    passed to ensure such rules would eventually
    become established

15
RCRA - Land Disposal
  • With exceptions, banned for certain
    chemicals/concentrations
  • Even if not banned, toxicity and/or mobility must
    be reduced to certain levels
  • Hence focus on treatment technologies
  • If disposal occurs
  • Double liners
  • Leachate collection systems
  • GW monitoring
  • Leak detection systems

16
Permitting
  • HSWA detailed permitting requirements
  • Permits required for treatment, storage and
    disposal facilities (TSDFs)
  • Incentive is to keep business running
  • Permits include
  • Corrective action plan for potential releases
  • Exposure assessment for potential releases
  • Five year review
  • See Handouts

17
Enforcement
  • EPA Enforcement increased after HSWA
  • HSWA made it a crime to knowingly
  • Transport hazardous waste without a manifest
  • Omit relevant information on a manifest form
  • Violate any of the regulations
  • Fail to file a required report or permit
    application
  • Fines / Imprisonment

18
Underground Storage Tanks
  • HSWA required regulatory program for USTs
  • Beginning 1988, ten year plan to evaluate and
    upgrade all tanks
  • Owners must have leak detection system or
    inventory control and regular testing
  • Maintain liability insurance
  • See handouts

19
FIGURE 2-4 Photograph of an underground storage
tank removal.
20
Hazardous Waste Regulations
  • Again, Congress passed RCRArequired EPA to
    promulgate specific regulations
  • Hazardous defined under RCRA if
  • Waste is listed in any four lists in regulations
  • Waste is tested and is found to be
  • Ignitable, corrosive, reactive or toxic
  • Waste is declared hazardous by generator

21
Characteristics
  • Ignitable
  • Liquids with flashpoints lt 600C
  • Solids that may cause fire at STP
  • Corrosive
  • pH lt 2 or gt 12.5
  • Corrodes steel gt 0.25 in/year
  • Reactive
  • Unstable, react with air, water
  • Create fumes
  • Toxic
  • Focus is on that which can leach out from waste
    matrix
  • TCLP / SPLP vis a vis realistic leaching
    scenarios

22
Generators / Transporters
  • Generators must evaluate and obtain and EPA ID
    number
  • Transporters must also obtain an EPA ID number
  • Cradle to grave tracking
  • Small quantity exemptions for lt 1000 kg/month

23
Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities (TSDF)
  • Landfills
  • Incinerators
  • Surface impoundments
  • Storage areas
  • Requires spill prevention procedures, contingency
    plans, training programs
  • Manifests and complete operating documentation
    must be maintained

24
FIGURE 2-5 Hazardous waste manifest, New York
State Department of Environmental Conservation.
25
E-Manifests
  • May 2001 EPA proposed modifications to the
    hazardous waste manifest system and the manifest
    form that is used to track hazardous waste
    shipments during their transportation
  • Feedback Collected through 2002
  • Roadmap presented in 2004
  • Implementation..?

26
Superfund
  • 1980 Comprehensive Environmental Response,
    Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
  • 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
    (SARA)
  • Primary purpose to clean up hazardous waste sites
    not regulated under RCRA
  • Initially established 1.6 Billion for Cleanup
  • SARA essentially re-wrote CERCLA, 8.5 Billion
    appropriated
  • Appropriations derived primarily through industry
    taxes
  • Current debate about continuing funding, taxes
    since removed

27
FIGURE 2-6 An abandoned plant becomes a Superfund
site. (Photo courtesy EPA.)
28
FIGURE 2-7 Activity schematic at a Superfund site.
29
Cleanup Standards
  • Almost always a residual, site, chemical and
    technique specific
  • Interplay of regulations
  • Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
    Requirements (ARARs)
  • A cover may be required for a contaminated site,
    that in turn must satisfy RCRA designs in terms
    of cap, liner system

30
Liability
  • While funded by tax (previously), EPA required
    to seek funds from PRPs
  • Lengthy litigation pursued by both EPA and PRPs
  • PRPs
  • Present/past property owners (including DOT)
  • Facility operators
  • Generators
  • Transporters

31
Other Federal Statutes
  • Toxic Substance Control Act
  • e.g., PCBs banned
  • Occupational Safety and Health Act
  • 40 hour OSHA training for Haz waste sites
  • Clean Water Act
  • Sewage treatment plants, NPDES permits, etc.
  • Safe Drinking Water Act
  • Drinking water standards (GW and SW) (e.g., p. 69
    of text)
  • Clean Air Act
  • SO2 Reductions required
  • NC large shift to producing FGD

32
CERCLA NC Analogue
  • Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act of 1987
  • This act requires the branch to maintain a
    catalog of inactive hazardous substance or waste
    disposal sites.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com