A New Method for Composite System Annualized Reliability Indices Based on Genetic Algorithms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

A New Method for Composite System Annualized Reliability Indices Based on Genetic Algorithms

Description:

The fitness of any chromosome 'j' is calculated by linearly scaling its ... states array can be analyzed to acquire valuable information about system states ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: eppe8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A New Method for Composite System Annualized Reliability Indices Based on Genetic Algorithms


1
A New Method for Composite System Annualized
Reliability Indices Based on Genetic Algorithms
By
  • Nader Samaan, Student,IEEE
  • Dr. C. Singh, Fellow, IEEE
  • Department of Electrical Engineering
  • Texas AM University
  • College Station, TX 77843, USA

2
Outline
  • Introduction to Power System Reliability and GA
  • Classification of Existing Methods.
  • Genetic Algorithm Approach for the Proposed
    Method.
  • Chromosome representation and States Array
    construction.
  • Algorithmic Structure.
  • State evaluation module.
  • Calculating Adequacy Annualized Indices.
  • Application to the RBTS
  • Advantage over conventional methods.
  • Conclusions Work in Progress.

3
Power System Reliability Functional Zones
4
Indices Calculated at Each Zone
  • Generation Capacity Reliability Evaluation
  • LOLP , LOLE , LOLF , EENS
  • Composite system Reliability
  • Annualized indices , Annual indices For the
    whole system and each bus LOLP , LOLE , LOLF
    ,EENS
  • Distribution System
  • Customer load point indices ,Failure Rate ,
    EENS , ECOST
  • System indices Average interruption frequency
    index, Customer average interruption duration
  • Contribution to Customer Failure ( 12 5 83)
  • Composite failure (global effect) Distribution
    failure(localized effect)

5
Classification of the Methods Used in Reliability
Assessment of Composite System
  • Analytical Methods
  • Contingency enumeration approach
  • Simulation methods
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Random Sampling , Sequential Sampling
  • Hybrid methods
  • Monte Carlo simulation for states sampling and
    then the use of linearized flow equation to
    evaluate sampled states

6
Limitations of Conventional Methods
  • Analytical Methods-
  • Difficulty to trace the numerous number of system
    states. Therefore the aim of methods based on
    analytical techniques is to prune the huge state
    space. This can be achieved by state ranking or
    state evaluation until a certain level of
    component outages is reached.
  • Monte Carlo Methods-
  • Simulation time increases as system components
    are more reliable.
  • As statistically based approach all sampled
    states need to be evaluated and may be more than
    once.

7
GA Construction
  • A genetic algorithm is a simulation of evolution
    where the rule of survival of the fittest is
    applied to a population of individuals. The basic
    genetic algorithm is as follows
  • 1. Create an initial population
  • 2. Evaluate all of the individuals
  • 3. Select a new population from the old
    population based on the fitness of the
    individuals.
  • 4.Apply some genetic operators (mutation
    crossover) to members of the population to create
    new solutions.

8
GA Approach
  • The proposed method can be divided into two main
    parts.
  • First GA searches intelligently for failure
    states through its fitness function using the
    linear programming module to determine if a load
    curtailment is needed for each sampled state.
    Sampled state data are then saved in state array.
    After the search process stops
  • The second step begins by using all of the saved
    state data to calculate the annualized indices
    for the whole system and at each load bus.

9
Chromosome Representation
Single line diagram of the RBTS test system.
  • Each power generation unit and transmission line
    is assumed to have two states, up and down.

10
Initialization
GA generates random binary chromosomes each of
them represents a system state
11
State Array Construction
Sampled State
States PropltPthreshold
Yes
Ignore this state, get a new sampled state
No
Previously Saved?
Get its data , get a new sampled state
Yes
No
Call state evaluation module save states data in
state array
12
Evaluation Function
  • The suitable choice for the evaluation function
    can add the required intelligence to GA state
    sampling

EPNSj LCj . PSj
13
Evolution of New Generation
  • The fitness of any chromosome j is calculated
    by linearly scaling its evaluation function
    value. . Scaling has the advantage of maintaining
    a reasonable difference between fitness values of
    different chromosomes. It also enhances the
    effectiveness of search by preventing an earlier
    super-chromosome from dominating other
    chromosomes which decreases the probability of
    obtaining new more powerful chromosomes .
    fitnessj A . evalj C
  • All chromosomes in the current generation are
    evaluated
  • The termination criterion is not satisfied then
    produce a new generation to scan more system
    states.
  • Old population passes through ,selection ,
    crossover operator and mutation operator to
    produce a new population.

14
GA operators
  • One point crossover , uniform flip mutation
  • Tournament selection
  • A set of chromosomes is randomly chosen. The
    chromosome that has the best fitness value, the
    highest in the proposed algorithm, is chosen for
    reproduction. Binary tournament is used in which
    the chosen set consists of two chromosomes. The
    probability of choosing any chromosome in the
    selected set is proportional to its fitness value
    relative to the whole population fitness value.

Mutation get a random number r if r lt pm
flip that bit from 1 to zero or zero to one in
case of binary representation.
15
The Aim of GA
  • The main idea of the proposed method is that at
    each generation more failure states are scanned
    especially those with higher probabilities i.e.
    have higher fitness.
  • Each of them will be saved in the state array. If
    dealing with an ordinary optimization problem the
    purpose is to obtain the maximum value of the
    fitness function and the decoded value for its
    chromosome.

16
States Evaluation
  • State evaluation is a very important stage in
    composite power system reliability assessment.
    Through this stage the current system state to be
    evaluated is judged if it is a failure or success
    state. If it is a failure state the amount of
    load curtailment for the whole system and the
    share of each load bus in this amount will be
    determined.
  • For the same optimal solution it is possible to
    have many scenarios of load curtailment at each
    bus. A load curtailment philosophy should be
    used. Importance of load is taken into
    consideration as a load curtailment philosophy .
  • Each load is divided into three parts Weights
    are given for each part in the objective
    according to the relative importance for each bus
    in comparison with the remaining buses. Weights
    are also adjusted so that the first part of each
    load is the least important and the third part is
    the most important.

17
DC Based Maximization Model
The variables vector that will be calculated by
the linear programming solver is Xip , PGj ,
?k
18
Assessment of Composite System Adequacy Indices
19
Case Study-RBTS System
The proposed algorithm has been implemented
through C
The total number of states that GA has sampled
and has saved in the states array is 2198 states
from which 1449 states result in load curtailment
i.e. 66 of saved states are failure states. It
can be seen that GA truncated the huge states
space of the 20 components in the system which is
larger than 1 million into a very small fraction
of it.
20
Best Chromosome
Two different fitness function gives two
different best chromosomes , The first has the
highest failure probability the second has the
highest risk index
21
Load Importance Effect on Buses Indices
22
Advantages of GA Over Monte Carlo Simulation
  • GA provides an intelligent search method. Through
    its fitness function it can be guided to acquire
    any part of the state space hunting more dominant
    events.
  • Sampled states are evaluated once which is not
    the case in Monte Carlo simulation.
  • In case of very reliable systems, Monte Carlo
    simulation needs much more time to converge ,
    which is not the case with GA as it depends on
    fitness value comparison
  • Obtained states array can be analyzed to acquire
    valuable information about system states
  • Parallel operation of GA Sampling can provide
    computational time reduction

23
Conclusions Research in Progress
  • An innovative method for composite power system
    reliability evaluation is presented
  • Guided by its fitness function and reproduction
    mechanism GA acts as an intelligent search tool
    to search for failure states that result in load
    curtailment
  • States sampled by GA are saved with all their
    related data in the states array which is used to
    calculate the annualized adequacy indices for
    system and load points.
  • A linear programming model was used to evaluate
    each state taking into consideration loads
    importance.
  • Accuracy and advantages of the proposed method
    over Monte Carlo methods has been shown.

24
Taking load Curve into consideration and
representation of multi-state components
  • Using clustering techniques the 8760 load values
    can be represented by certain number of point ,
    each with a certain probability.
  • Load value is represented in the chromosome

State 5?101
  • Multi state components will be represented using
    two or more genes

25
Parallel Operation of GA Sampling
  • Checking if a certain state was saved
    previously, becomes a burden on the computational
    effort in case of large system.
  • GA sampling can be preformed on different
    machines on the same time saving only a small
    portion of the state space on each machine. Each
    portion is not overlapping with other portions.

26
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com