Centers of Excellence in Finnish University Education 20102012: Evaluation Method - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Centers of Excellence in Finnish University Education 20102012: Evaluation Method

Description:

... inspiring and high quality education to students who seek their academic degrees. ... and international visibility to the academic teaching in Finland. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: KEKA4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Centers of Excellence in Finnish University Education 20102012: Evaluation Method


1
Centers of Excellence in Finnish University
Education 2010-2012 Evaluation Method
  • Professor Karl-Erik Michelsen
  • Member of the planning group
  • Finnish Chair of the evaluation team

2
Why this competition?
  • To enhance the quality and respect of higher
    education in the era of big science and
    transnational research collaboration.
  • To encourage faculties and departments to
    develope innovative, inspiring and high quality
    education to students who seek their academic
    degrees.
  • To reward faculties and units who are committed
    to high quality academic education.
  • To gain national and international visibility to
    the academic teaching in Finland.

3
Individual price or collective reward?
  • It is a FINHEEC tradition to reward faculties,
    departments and units instead of individuals.
  • Academic teaching is a collective effort which
    integrates teaching staff, students and outside
    stakeholders.
  • A centre of excellence must show consistency and
    long term commitment to high quality academic
    teaching.
  • A centre of excellence must have a strong
    identity and clear vision for the future.

4
Planning group
  • Chair Professor Riitta Pyykkö, University of
    Turku, Board member of FINHEEC (later Chair of
    FINHEEC)
  • Members
  • Director Asko Karjalainen, PhD, Teaching
    Development Unit, University of Oulu
  • Researcher Jan Lundell, PhD, Academy of Finland
    Research Fellow, University of Helsinki
  • Professor Karl-Erik Michelsen, PhD, Lappeenranta
    University of Technology
  • Student Veera Virta, Helsinki School of Economics
  • Secretary Senior Adviser Helka Kekäläinen, PhD,
    FINHEEC.

5
Criteria
  • 1) mission of the unit, 2) programme and course
    design, 3) delivery of education, 4) outputs,
  • 5) continual development.
  • The criteria was intended to be used flexibly and
    to ensure the objectivity of the evaluation. It
    was not an absolute "gauge, but rather a tool to
    help the evaluation team to form an overall
    picture of each unit's application and to compare
    the applicants.
  • The aim was to find the genuine quality in the
    application, free from presentation variations.
  • International interaction, cooperation across
    disciplinary, institutional and unit boundaries
    and networking were to be regarded as favourable
    factors in all the content areas.

6
Evaluation team
  • The international experts
  • Vice Rector Birute Klaas, University of Tartu,
    Estonia
  • Professor Arild Raaheim, University of Bergen,
    Norway
  • Deputy School Secretary Helen Uglow, London
    Business School
  • Head of Unit Stefan Bienefeld, German Rectors'
    Conference
  • The Finnish experts
  • Student Suvi Eriksson, University of Oulu
  • Student Jonas Heikkilä, Åbo Akademi University
  • Professor Emeritus Juhani Jussila
  • Regional Development Director Vesa Taatila,
    Laurea Polytechnics
  • Chair Professor Karl-Erik Michelsen
  • FINHEEC Secretary General Helka Kekäläinen and
    Project Managers Kirsi Hiltunen and Kenneth
    Lundin

7
Evaluation timeline
  • Stage I Publication of a call for proposals and
    evaluation criteria
  • Time 7.3.2008
  • Stage II Universities prepared their
    applications
  • Time 7.3.-30.6.2008
  • Stage III Evaluation of applications
  • Time July - August 2008
  • The international evaluation team appraised the
    applications and gave concise feedback on each
    application on a FINHEEC form. The team convened
    to select 18 units for the second round at its
    workshop on 22 August 2008.

8
  • Stage IV Organisation of site visits
  • Time September October 2008
  • The evaluation team, augmented by four Finnish
    experts, decided on its division of work, and the
    dates of the visits were set with the units. Each
    unit planned the programme of the visit together
    with FINHEEC, based on the wishes of the
    evaluation team.
  • Stage V Site visits
  • Time 29.9.-24.10.2008
  • The evaluators and secretaries visited the
    units.

9
  • Stage VI Workshop for formulating a proposal to
    FINHEEC
  • Time 27.-28.10.2008
  • The evaluation team and secretaries met at a
    workshop led by the Finnish chair to discuss the
    findings and to decide on the units to be
    recommended to FINHEEC. The team formulated a
    recommendation to FINHEEC as to the Centres of
    Excellence to be rewarded.
  • Stage VII FINHEEC's decision
  • Time 13.11.2008
  • FINHEEC discussed the evaluation team's proposal
    at its meeting and decided accordingly to
    designate ten Centres of Excellence in university
    education for 2010-2012.

10
  • Stage VIII International seminar
  • Time 24.-25.2.2009
  • The evaluation process ends in an international
    seminar where the evaluation method is presented
    and the designated Centres of Excellence present
    themselves.

11
Centres of Excellence in university education
2010-2012
  • Helsinki University of Technology, Department of
    Computer Science and Engineering
  • Lappeenranta University of Technology, Department
    of Industrial Management
  • University of Art and Design Helsinki, School of
    Motion Picture, Television and Production Design
  • University of Helsinki, Faculty of Pharmacy
  • University of Helsinki, Department of Computer
    Science
  • University of Jyväskylä, Department of Physics
  • University of Lapland, Department of Social Work
  • University of Oulu, Department of Educational
    Sciences and Teacher Education
  • University of Oulu, Department of Process and
    Environmental Engineering
  • University of Turku, Faculty of Medicine
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com