Internal Assessment and Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Internal Assessment and Development

Description:

Evaluates the quality of an academic unit and its degree programs ... Reports on the strengths and weaknesses of unit and degree programs. Program Review ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: jsh1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Internal Assessment and Development


1
Internal Assessment and Development
  • Jan M. Shane
  • Wednesday, August 2, 2006
  • Pathways to Leadership Workshop

2
Opportunities for Internal Assessment
  • Specialized accreditation self-studies
  • Program Reviews and other on-going institutional
    assessment requirements
  • Special university initiatives (i.e.
    reorganization studies)

3
Program Review
  • Typically mandated but not always utilized well
  • Occurs at the program and/or unit level
  • A report is submitted to the institution and
    (possibly) a state board

4
Program Review
  • From the University Perspective
  • Evaluates the quality of an academic unit and
    its degree programs
  • Affirms units current status and future plans
    are congruent with those of the College and
    University
  • Informs budget planning and decision making at
    the unit, college and university level
  • Reports on the strengths and weaknesses of unit
    and degree programs.

5
Program Review
  • From the Department/program Perspective
  • Engages faculty and administration in a process
    that validates academic rigor and program
    viability to internal and external audiences
  • Identifies strengths and weaknesses of the unit
    and programs
  • Periodic opportunity for rigorous self-evaluation
    to advance program excellence.
  • Allows unit to identify strengths and weaknesses.

6
Principles of good practice in PR
  • Should be both critical and constructive
  • Should be linked to institutional priorities
  • Must be faculty-driven
  • Unit should determine its own quality measures
  • Should be outcomes-based and evidence provided

7
Principles of good practice in PR
  • Always begin with a thorough self-study
  • Look at SLOs early in the self-study
  • Appoint a senior faculty member to help
  • Ensure faculty, student and alumni participation
  • Other offices to work with
  • Library
  • Institutional research
  • Grants and contracts office
  • Assessment office

8
Appropriate use of data for PR
  • What information do you need to help tell your
    story?
  • Office of Institutional Research
  • Enrollment trends, profile of major, degree
    trends, graduation rates, discipline costs,
    studentfaculty ratios, faculty profile.

9
Appropriate use of data for PR
  • Grants and Contracts Office
  • External submissions and awards
  • Funding amounts
  • Faculty participation in interdisciplinary grants
  • Honors program
  • Faculty participation
  • Majors enrolled in honors

10
Appropriate use of data for PR
  • Assessment Office
  • Alumni surveys, national surveys
  • Library
  • Collection size, relevant data bases. Journal
    holdings, library instruction sessions by course
  • National data
  • FAEIS
  • Delaware study

11
Program self-study
  • Program/unit
  • Describe the program characteristics,
    uniqueness
  • How is unit/program central to mission of
    institution
  • Describe planning processes (long- and
    short-range plans for curriculum, facilities,
    equipment, hiring) and attach plans

12
Program self-study
  • Program/unit (cont.)
  • Facilities
  • Academic advisement and career counseling
  • Library
  • Accreditations (recent findings by accreditor)
  • Students
  • Student demand
  • Career placement
  • Profile of majors
  • Honors program participation

13
Program self-study
  • Faculty
  • Indicators of faculty quality
  • Natl reputation of faculty
  • Indicators of quality teaching
  • Overview of scholarly work of faculty
  • Diversity of faculty
  • Typical faculty assignments

14
Program self-study
  • Curriculum
  • Rationale for curriculum
  • Coherence of curriculum
  • Summary of recent curricular changes
  • Reference the SLP Assessment Plan
  • Goals and quality measures of the program
  • Indicators of quality in the discipline
  • Peer comparison programs for each quality
    indicator

15
Program self-study
  • Recommendations
  • Identify strengths and areas for improvement
  • Make recommendations and incorporate into
    planning documents

16
Accreditation Trends
  • Regional more emphasis on general education,
    comparisons between institutions, no co-ed left
    behind
  • Specialized more emphasis on critical thinking
    and connections between general education and the
    major, evidential

17
A final question
  • What are the most significant issues facing
    higher education at a national level?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com