STANDARD FORM 330: The New Form for ArchitectEngineer Qualifications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

STANDARD FORM 330: The New Form for ArchitectEngineer Qualifications

Description:

1996: Report by Federal Facilities Council identified needed improvements to SFs ... for SFs 254/255: GSA (Chair), USACE, NAVFAC, NASA and Veterans Affairs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:192
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: HQU2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STANDARD FORM 330: The New Form for ArchitectEngineer Qualifications


1
STANDARD FORM 330The New Form for
Architect-Engineer Qualifications
Don Evick, P.E. HQUSACE
2
Background/Schedule
  • 1996 Report by Federal Facilities Council
    identified needed improvements to SFs 254/255
  • October 1998 Ad hoc Federal group established to
    develop a replacement for SFs 254/255 GSA
    (Chair), USACE, NAVFAC, NASA and Veterans Affairs
  • July 2000 Proposed SF 330 submitted by ad hoc
    group to FAR Council for review
  • October 2001 Proposed SF 330 published in
    Federal Register for public comment
  • January 2002 Public comment period closed

3
Background/Schedule
  • January 2003 Ad hoc group submitted final form
    and response to public comments to FAR
    Secretariat
  • March 2003 Approved by Civilian Agency
    Acquisition Council
  • Mid-summer 2003 Final form to be published in
    Federal Register. Must still be approved by
  • Defense Acquisition Regulations Council
  • Office of Management and Budget
  • Effective date 6 Months after publication

4
Objectives
  • Replace SFs 254 and 255, which are largely
    unchanged since 1975
  • Merge two forms into one (SF 254 was rarely used
    alone)
  • Part I Contract-Specific Qualifications
  • Part II General Qualifications
  • Delete duplicate information
  • Expand essential information
  • Eliminate information of marginal value
  • Reflect current A-E disciplines and services

5
Part I - Contract-Specific Qualifications
  • A. Contract Information
  • B. A-E Point of Contact
  • C. Proposed Team - including role in contract
  • D. Organizational Chart - attach
  • E. Resumes of Key Personnel
  • Similar to SF 255
  • Expanded to one page per person
  • Requires information on 5 relevant projects

6
Part I - Contract-Specific Qualifications
  • F. Example Projects - more detailed than SF
    255
  • One page per project
  • Brief description and relevance
  • Firms involved and roles
  • G. Key Personnel Participation In Example
    Projects - matrix format
  • H. Additional Information
  • I. Authorized Representative

7
Part I - Contract-Specific Qualifications
  • Other Major Changes From SF 255
  • Better instructions
  • Number of Personnel by Discipline
  • Shown in Part II only - not duplicated in Part I
  • Deleted Block 9 - All Work Currently Being
    Performed for Federal Agencies limited value

8
Part II - General Qualifications
  • Blocks 1-8 Name, Address, POC, Ownership,
    Corporate History, DUNS Number, Etc.
  • Block 9 Employees by Discipline
  • Using discipline code numbers
  • Totals for branch office and firm - not number to
    be utilized on project as in SF 255/Block 4
  • Block 10 Profile of Firms Experience
  • Uses revenue index number instead of specific
  • Doesnt require of projects as in SF 254/Block
    10
  • Block 11 Revenue History only average of last
    3 years instead of 5 year breakdown as in SF
    254/Block 9
  • Block 12 Authorized Representative

9
Part II - General Qualifications
  • Other Major Changes From SF 254
  • Deleted list of all offices of firm (Block 7)
  • Deleted 30 example projects (Block 11)
  • Updated/expanded disciplines and experience
    profile codes

10
Major Comments/Responses
11
Major Comments/Responses
12
Summary
  • Final SF 330 to be published in summer 2003 and
    effective 6 months later
  • Final SF 330 responsive to public comments
  • Provides essential information agencies need for
    A-E selection in streamlined format
  • Reflects current A-E industry
  • Should take less effort to complete after initial
    learning curve
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com