An Evaluation of Mediabased Online Courses and Emerging Course Criteria - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

An Evaluation of Mediabased Online Courses and Emerging Course Criteria

Description:

Lisa Cheney-Steen, Academic Dean, Colorado Community ... Monterey Institute for Technology and Education (MITE) Online Course Evaluation Project (OCEP) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: robert427
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Evaluation of Mediabased Online Courses and Emerging Course Criteria


1
An Evaluation of Media-based Online Courses and
Emerging Course Criteria
  • Lisa Cheney-Steen, Academic Dean, Colorado
    Community Colleges Online
  • Rhonda M. Epper, Director of Online Program
    Development, Community College of Denver

2
Monterey Institute for Technology and Education
(MITE)
  • Online Course Evaluation Project (OCEP)
  • MI-TE is an educational non-profit that promotes
    the development and distribution of high-quality
    online courses

3
Online Course Evaluation Project (OCEP)
  • First phase funded by The William C. and Flora
    Hewlett Foundation
  • Collaboration with EduTools and WCET
  • Identify and evaluate online courses in higher
    education and Advanced Placement?.
  • Develop a set of selection criteria to define
    developers and courses to evaluate

4
Online Course Evaluation Project (OCEP)slide
two
  • Develop a set of objective categories for
    evaluation of online course and content
  • Examine courses to determine if they meet a high
    level of scholarship, scope, instructional design
    and interoperability (technology)
  • Includes assessment of the course developers
    development and operational models for ensuring
    course distribution and sustainability

5
Course and Developer Selection Criteria
  • Curricular Courses
  • Object Architecture
  • Development Model
  • Content Model
  • Multimedia Rich
  • Course Investment

6
Developers Surveyed
  • Surveyed over 170 developers
  • Online educational organizations and virtual
    schools
  • Individual educational institutions and programs
  • Private/commercial course developers
  • Educational publishers
  • First phase of evaluation included 15 developers

7
Evaluation of Online AP Courses
  • Multiple partners
  • Western Consortium for Accelerated Learning
    Opportunities (WCALO), a project of WICHE, funded
    by US Dept of Education.
  • WCET (EduTools)
  • Monterey Institute (OCEP)

8
Evaluation of Online AP Courses
  • WCALOs Goal
  • to increase the number of low-income students
    who are enrolling and succeeding in advanced
    placement courses and tests.
  • WCALO identified a need to assist school
    administrators teachers in selecting online AP
    courses for their students

9
Evaluation of Online AP Courses
  • WCALO and WCETs EduTools are partnering to
    create a pilot EduTools site with reviews of
    online AP courses
  • 14 courses reviewed in four subject areas
  • Biology, Calculus AB, US History, English Lit.
  • 5 course providers/developers
  • Wide range of development investment

10
The Evaluation Categories and Process
  • The Evaluation Team
  • Project Director
  • Course Evaluator
  • Academic Evaluator
  • Technology Evaluator
  • Course Developer Review and Comment

11
The Evaluation Categories and Process
  • Categories organized into 7 major divisions
  • Scope and Scholarship
  • User Interface
  • Course Features and Production Values
  • Assessments and Test Items
  • Instructor and Learner
  • Technology
  • Distribution Model
  • Each category is defined and consistent
    guidelines provided for evaluators

12
Course Development Trends
  • Course development models
  • Faculty-driven, supported, and centralized
  • Content development models
  • Textbook-centric, content online, multimedia
  • Use of multimedia
  • Investment models
  • Focus on learning object architecture and
    interoperability

13
Course Evaluation Trends
  • Content is most important, CMS less important
  • Use of multimedia, experiential exercises, and
    game playing as integral component of the
    dissemination of content rather than an ancillary
    feature
  • Learning object development and centralized
    storage of content
  • Interoperability, greater distribution

14
Next Phase of OCEP
  • Undergoing revision of the research design
  • Revise evaluation categories per feedback
  • More detailed training for evaluators to ensure
    consistency
  • Expand developers and courses to be evaluated
  • Launch public access to information

15
An Evaluation of Media-based Online Courses and
Emerging Course Criteria
  • Lisa Cheney-Steen, Academic Dean
  • Colorado Community College Online
  • Lisa.Cheney-Steen_at_cccs.edu
  • Butch Gemin
  • Monterey Institute for Technology and Education
  • bgemin_at_montereyinstitute.org
  • www.montereyinstitute.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com