INCTR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

INCTR

Description:

Clinical Research Program 2003 2004 Melissa Adde Major Functions Coordination of Strategy Groups Management of Clinical Research Studies Administration of INCTR ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: inctrCtis
Category:
Tags: inctr

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INCTR


1
Clinical Research Program
  • 2003 2004
  • Melissa Adde

2
Major Functions
  • Coordination of Strategy Groups
  • Management of Clinical Research Studies
  • Administration of INCTR Ethical Review Committee
  • Provision of Data Management Services
  • Education and Training

3
Strategy Groups
  • Comprised of investigators from developing
    countries
  • Disease-specific
  • Determine role of the group/INCTR in the control
    of a specific cancer
  • Promote public and professional education

4
Strategy Groups
  • African Burkitts Lymphoma
  • Breast Cancer
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Leukemia
  • Leukemia Study Group of India
  • Lymphoma
  • Osteosarcoma
  • Retinoblastoma

5
Strategy Groups
Breast Cancer
Retinoblastoma
Leukemia (India)
Keukenhof
Lymphoma (African BL)
6
Strategy Group Meetings
  • African BL, Aug 2004 (Tanzania)
  • Breast Cancer
  • October, 2003 (Egypt)
  • May, 2004 (Brussels)
  • Cervical Cancer, Aug 2004 (Brussels)
  • Leukemia/Leukemia Study Group of India
  • Feb, 2004 (India)
  • July, 2004 (videoconference)
  • Lymphoma, Oct 2003 (Egypt)
  • Retinoblastoma, April, 2004 (Brussels)

7
Translation in Actions
  • 5 On-going Projects (not including palliative
    care, IARC project, Lilly study)
  • 8 Projects proposed or in development
  • Remember
  • More than simply willingness to collaborate
  • Commitment to work together to develop projects
  • Takes time Rome wasnt built in a day!

8
Strategy Groups
  • On-going activities will be presented and
    followed by discussion in Session 8
  • Specific presentations will be given for
  • African Burkitts Lymphoma (M. Durosinmi)
  • Breast Cancer (Z. Aziz)
  • Cervical Cancer (C. Santos)
  • Leukemia Study Group of India (S. Advani)
  • Retinoblastoma (S. Epelman)

9
The Treatment and Characterization of Burkitts
Lymphoma (BL) in Africa
  • Primary Objectives
  • Characterize presentation features
  • Assess response, EFS, DFS and OS
  • Characterize pattern of CNS disease and relapse
  • Assess toxicities
  • Secondary Objectives
  • Characterize pattern of gene expression
  • Assess serum EBV DNA levels

10
The Treatment and Characterization of BL in Africa
  • First-Line Treatment
  • Newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients
  • Two treatment arms
  • Low risk arm (single extra abdominal mass lt 10
    cm)
  • High risk arm (all other patients)
  • Second-Line Treatment
  • Failures of First-Line Treatment

11
The Treatment and Characterization of BL in Africa
  • 5 participating institutions in 4 countries
  • Kenya, Nigeria (2), Tanzania, Uganda
  • INCTR ERC approval July, 2003
  • Local ethical approval in 4 of 5 participating
    institutions
  • Patient accrual began in August, 2004
  • Enrolled 3
  • Not entered 1 (not eligible history prior
    chemo)

12
Retrospective Survey of Presentation Features of
Breast Cancer and Risk Factors for Treatment
Outcome
  • Objectives
  • Quantify total number of breast cancer patients
    evaluated
  • Define history and presentation features of
    breast cancer
  • Define frequency of risk factors for treatment
    outcome (diagnosis, stage, treatment)

13
Retrospective Survey of Presentation Features of
Breast Cancer and Risk Factors for Treatment
Outcome
  • Objectives (continued)
  • Estimate the response, DFS and OS
  • Assess frequency of risk factors known to be
    relevant in western populations
  • Correlate risk factors for treatment outcome with
    response, DFS and OS

14
Retrospective Survey of Presentation Features of
Breast Cancer and Risk Factors for Treatment
Outcome
  • Participating institutions in 9 countries
  • Latin America Argentina, Mexico and Peru
  • Africa Tanzania
  • Middle East Egypt, Kuwait
  • South Asia Pakistan, India and Nepal
  • Initiate in 4 centers, then expand to others

15
Retrospective Survey of Presentation Features of
Breast Cancer and Risk Factors for Treatment
Outcome
  • INCTR ERC approval July, 2003
  • Local approval in 8 of 9 participating
    institutions
  • Initiated in June, 2004
  • Cancer Institute, Chennai, India

16
Phase II Study of Previously Untreated Metastatic
Osteosarcoma with a Combination of Chemotherapy
and Surgery
  • Short duration protocol (25 weeks)
  • Alternating cycles of 2 chemotherapy regimens
    every 3 weeks
  • Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant
  • Surgical resection of primary, Week 12
  • Surgical resection of metastatic disease, Week 17

17
Phase II Study of Previously Untreated Metastatic
Osteosarcoma
  • Problem Rate of accrual lower than anticipated
    rate
  • Observed vs assumed rate of accrual
  • PI leaving participating institution
  • Surgeons declined to participate
  • Inability to perform limb-sparing procedures
  • Competing group/institutional protocols

18
Phase II Study of Previously Untreated Metastatic
Osteosarcoma
19
Phase II Study of Previously Untreated Metastatic
Osteosarcoma
20
The Treatment and Characterization of ALL in
Children, Adolescents and Young Adults
  • Primary Objectives
  • Characterize pattern of ALL in India
    (immunophenotype, DNA index, molecular profiling)
  • Correlate lab characteristics with clinical
    characteristics
  • Attempt to identify prognostic factors predictive
    of relapse, EFS, DFS and OS

21
The Treatment and Characterization of ALL
  • Secondary Objectives
  • To assess acute toxicity of planned therapy
  • To collect baseline and post-treatment
    assessments of neuropsychological function for
    future studies of late CNS toxicity

22
The Treatment and Characterization of ALL
  • Protocol approved by INCTR ERC, January, 2003
  • Protocol approved by ICMR, May, 2004
  • Protocol approved locally in 3 of 4 participating
    institutions
  • Implementation Meeting, July, 2004
  • Patient accrual began Aug 1, 2004

23
The Treatment and Characterization of ALL
  • Total Number of Patients Entered 13
  • Males/Females 10/3
  • Age Range 1 22 years
  • Total Number Not Enrolled 1 (ineligible, prior
    treatment)

24
Understanding Problems Faced by Parents of
Children with Retinoblastoma (RB) Prior to
Treatment
  • Objectives
  • To determine association between stage and time
    interval between first symptom, date of diagnosis
    and date of first treatment
  • To identify factors influencing time interval
  • To determine association between childs age and
    stage
  • To determine if factors arise from parents,
    demographics or other aspects of primary health
    care.

25
Understanding Problems Faced by Parents of
Children with RB Prior to Treatment
  • Participating Institutions 15
  • Contributing Institutions 10
  • India (3)
  • Turkey (2)
  • Brazil (1)
  • Mexico (1)
  • Nigeria (1)
  • Pakistan (1)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

26
Understanding Problems Faced by Parents of
Children with RB Prior to Treatment
  • Initiated in 2001
  • Experience with survey gained
  • Positively received by parents/guardians of
    children
  • Questionnaire and Clinical Data Form recently
    modified
  • 289 surveys recently analyzed

27
Understanding Problems Faced by Parents of
Children with RB Prior to Treatment
  • Important Findings to Date
  • Older children have higher stages of disease
  • Strong association of higher stages in children
    from rural communities
  • Strong association of stage with fathers
    education level
  • Time interval between first symptom and diagnosis
    was associated with fathers education level

28
Projects in Development - 1
  • African Burkitts Lymphoma
  • Treatment of Lymphomatous Meningitis with
    Liposomal ARAC
  • Phase I/II Study of Prozac in Relapse Patients
  • Breast Cancer
  • Randomized Trial Comparing Three Treatment
    Approaches for Stage III Breast Cancer

29
Projects in Development - 2
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Treatment of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
  • Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
  • Expanding Coverage of Screening Programs

30
Projects in Development - 3
  • Lymphoma
  • Randomized trial to evaluate the use of CHOP vs
    CHOP anti-CD20 in newly diagnosed patients with
    Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
  • Retinoblastoma
  • Treatment of Extraocular Retinoblastoma

31
Data Management of Research Studies
  • Design and Development of Study-Specific
    Databases
  • Retinoblastoma Survey Study
  • African BL Protocol
  • Leukemia Protocol
  • Approaches Used
  • INCTR or participating institutions perform data
    entry
  • Stand alone applications vs internet based

32
Data Quality Assurance Plans
  • Study-specific SOPs
  • data entry, queries, updates, manuals
  • Functions Incorporated into Databases
  • CRF tracking (submitted, overdue, cleaned)
  • Basic business rules to minimize entry errors
  • Minimum checks (missing or out of range values)
  • Extensive checks (internal consistency of data)
  • Listings
  • Query generation and tracking
  • Audit trails

33
Data Management
  • Study Specific Monitoring Plans
  • Data monitors appointed for certain studies
  • Independent pathology reviews
  • Periodic visits to sites for auditing purposes
    (using INCTR personnel or expert volunteers)
  • Creation of study committees (local
    investigators)
  • Assignment of responsibilities of study
    committees

34
Provision of Data Management Services
  • Within scope of INCTR mission
  • Relates to an important cancer in developing
    countries
  • Patient accrual completed (516 patients)

Phase III randomized comparison of Gemcitabine,
Cisplatin and Radiation followed by Adjuvant
Gemcitabine and Cisplatin vs Concurrent Cisplatin
and Radiation in Cancer of the Cervix (Stages IIB
to IVA)
35
Education and Training
  • Protocol Implementation Meetings
  • Leukemia Study July, 2004
  • African BL Study August, 2004
  • Clinical Trials Workshop, Brazil, Sept, 2004
  • Basic Data Management Workshop
  • Data Managers/Monitor Training for Leukemia Study
    (November, 2004)
  • In-depth review of protocol, CRFs, study
    procedures with practical experience (e.g.,
    toxicity grading)

36
Special Thank You
  • Dr David Venzon, Biostatistician,NCI
  • Mr Paul Jarosinski, Pharmacist, NIH
  • Martha Flores-Rojo, Instituto Nacional de
    Pediatria, Mexico
  • INCTR Ethical Review Committee
  • Panel of External Scientific Reviewers
  • Capitol Technology Information Services (CTIS)
  • Staff of Clinical Trials Office

37
Thank
You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com