Integrated Pest Management Future: IPM in whole farm context - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Integrated Pest Management Future: IPM in whole farm context

Description:

Integrated Pest Management Future: IPM in whole farm context Ecological Basis for Pest Management Future: Moving beyond IPM to ecosystem redesign. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:277
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: entnemdep7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrated Pest Management Future: IPM in whole farm context


1
Integrated Pest Management
2
Agricultural Pests
  • Weeds
  • Insects
  • Nematodes
  • Diseases
  • Snails and slugs
  • Vertebrates (rodents, birds, etc.)

3
Management Strategies
  • Prevent or exclude
  • Eradicate
  • Reduce
  • No action

4
Tactics
  • Chemicals
  • Natural (organic) or synthetic
  • Herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, etc.
  • Host Plant Resistance
  • Characteristics inherent to the plant
  • Cultural Practices
  • Make environment less enticing to pests
  • Removing plant residues
  • Biological Control
  • Use one organism to control another.

5
Pesticide Use in the U.S.
  • In 2007, U.S. pesticide use
  • totaled 5.1 billion pounds.
  • cost 11.8 billion dollars.

Hypochlorites 51 (bleach water treatment)
Conventional Pesticides 17
Other Pesticides 5
Wood Preservative 19
Specialty Biocides 8
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Pesticide Use on Major US Crops
11
Management (IPM) vs. Control or Eradication
  • Eradication? Is that really possible?
  • 1960s Traditional IPM
  • IPM Integrated Pest Management
  • Integrated coordinate several methods
  • Pest all pests, not just one type
  • Management reduce vs. control

12
Management (IPM) vs. Control or Eradication
  • Management
  • Maintain populations below damaging levels.
  • Responsive treatment (treatment as needed) vs.
    preemptive treatment.

13
Management (IPM) vs. Control or Eradication
  • Management
  • Maintain populations below damaging levels.
  • Responsive treatment (treatment as needed) vs.
    preemptive treatment.
  • Requires effective management tactic (often a
    pesticide, but objective is to reduce pesticide
    application to when needed).
  • Usually requires some sampling or monitoring of
    populations.
  • Usually requires a damage threshold.

14
Crop Damage Threshold
15
Crop Damage Threshold
No loss in yield at very low pest densities
16
Crop Damage Threshold
  • pest density at which yield is decreased (may
    not be same as first evidence of pest damage).
  • Form of yield loss or damage relationship to pest
    population density varies with pest and crop.
  • Many plants can tolerate some damage (e.g., low
    amounts of defoliation may not affect yield).

17
Thresholds
  • Crop damage threshold (does not involve ).
  • Economic threshold general term used to
    describe pest density at which treatment is
    necessary to prevent economic injury. Several
    types of economic thresholds may be specified
  • Economic Injury Level pest density at which
    value of yield returned (damage prevented) equals
    cost of control.
  • Action Threshold pest density at which
    treatment is necessary to prevent economic injury
    (to prevent population from reaching EIL).

18
Economic Injury Level
Change in Yield when pests are reduced by
treatment
P Treatment reduces pests from level X to level P
19
Economic Injury Level
Change in Yield has some value that is gained.
Reducing pests costs
20
Economic Injury Level
EIL Point at which yield returned () cost
() of control
Change in Yield has some value that is gained
Reducing pests costs
21
Economic Injury Level
EIL Point at which yield returned () cost
() of control
Change in Yield has some value that is gained
Suppose EIL is here
Reducing pests costs
22
Economic Injury Level
EIL Point at which yield returned () cost
() of control
Suppose EIL is here
Treating at point above X (XEIL) returns more
than the cost of treatment
Treating at point below X (XEIL) will not pay
for cost of treatment
23
Economic Threshold
  • If pest population gt EIL Treat
  • If pest population lt EIL Dont treat

24
Economic Threshold
  • If pest population gt EIL Treat
  • If pest population lt EIL Dont treat
  • What if pest population changes rapidly over time
    ?
  • What if you cantt apply treatment right away ?
  • Pest population could reach or pass EIL while we
    wait around to treat !

25
Thresholds
  • Crop damage threshold (does not involve ).
  • Economic threshold general term used to
    describe pest density at which treatment is
    necessary to prevent economic injury. Several
    types of economic thresholds may be specified
  • Economic Injury Level pest density at which
    value of yield returned (damage prevented) equals
    cost of control.
  • Action Threshold pest density at which
    treatment is necessary to prevent economic injury
    (to prevent population from reaching EIL).

26
Action ThresholdTreat at AT to avoid reaching
EIL
AT often used in entomology, insect populations
change rapidly over time
27
Economic Thresholds
  • Static situation react to treatment at one
    point in time -- e.g., anticipated yield related
    to density of a soil-borne pest prior to planting
    decision is whether to use soil fumigation or
    not.
  • Dynamic situation insect population changes
    during season population level recorded during
    scouting may increase to even higher level before
    insecticide can be applied.

28
To work with AT and EIL, must know
  • Plant damage/pest density relationship.
  • Sampling of pest.
  • Cost and performance of treatment.
  • Economic forecast of crop value.
  • Scouting programs survey fields to supply these
    data.

29
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
  • Combination of two or more tactics in management
    of a pest.
  • Example management of pest mites in apple
    orchards by acaricide sprays and biological
    control from predatory mites (see Ch. 13 by Croft
    in Metcalf and Luckmann, 1994).
  • Replacement of effective pesticides by
    non-chemical methods may require integration of
    several management methods (e.g., integrating
    solarization crop rotation to substitute for
    methyl bromide).

30
Integrated Management of Mites in Apple Orchards
NO SPRAY
Predatory mite population
SPRAY
Pest mite population
31
Integrated Pest Management
  • Could include management of several different
    kinds of pests
  • Crop rotations to affect soil-borne insects,
    diseases, nematodes, weeds).
  • Whether integrated or not, management methods
    directed at one pest may affect other pest groups
    and non-target organisms.
  • Herbicide-killed weeds affect nematodes,
    diseases, etc.

32
Traditional IPM
  • In practice, many examples of IPM are management
    of insects with insecticides.
  • Traditional IPM has resulted in reduced number of
    insecticide sprays and savings in .

33
Limitations to more wide use of IPM
  • Lack of information on
  • Thresholds
  • Pest biology
  • Sampling methods
  • Effective management methods
  • Etc

34
Future IPM in whole farm context
35
Ecological Basis for Pest Management
  • Future Moving beyond IPM to ecosystem redesign.
  • Contrasting approaches for pest management

36
Traditional IPM
  • Treat when needed to keep pest below economic
    injury level, but natural tendency of pest
    population to expand toward K.

37
Organic Agriculture
Redesign system to obtain K below economic injury
level but requires much knowledge of pest ecology.
38
Organic Agriculture
Redesign system to obtain K below economic injury
level but requires much knowledge of pest ecology.
Redesign to lower K by using different crop
variety, biological control agents in system, etc.
39
References
  • Text, Ch. 11, pp. 226-239.
  • Carroll et al. 1990. Ch.15.
  • Metcalf and Luckmann. 1994. Chs. 1, 13.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com