Transplantation Xiang Li, Urology Department West China - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 87
About This Presentation
Title:

Transplantation Xiang Li, Urology Department West China

Description:

Transplantation Xiang Li, Urology Department West China Hospital, Sichuan University Acknowlegement To Dr. Lu Yiping and Dr. Wang jia To other Colleagues working on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:228
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 88
Provided by: syyxHxyxC
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transplantation Xiang Li, Urology Department West China


1
Transplantation
  • Xiang Li, Urology Department
  • West China Hospital, Sichuan University

2
Acknowlegement
  • To Dr. Lu Yiping and Dr. Wang jia
  • To other Colleagues working on renal and liver
    transplantation

3
Transplantation is a Dream?
  • Dream of Paranoia
  • Dream of excellent surgeon who wants to excel
    himself.
  • Dream of excellent scientist who believe nothing
    is impossible.

4
Can you imagine?
Can you imagine?
Can you imagine?
5
Contents
  • Basic concepts of transplantation
  • Clinical Organ transplantation
  • Renal Transplantation, RT
  • Transplantation Immunology
  • MHC and Tissue Matching
  • Graft Rejection
  • Immunosuppression

6
Definition of Transplantation
  • Implantation of non-self tissue into the body
  • the process of taking cells, tissues, or organs
    called a graft (transplant), from one part or
    individual and placing them into another (usually
    different individual).
  • donor the individual who provides the graft.
  • recipient or host the individual who receives
    the graft.

7
  • Blood Transfusion
  • First attempts were unsuccesful (MISMATCH)
  • Discovery of blood groups (Red cell antigens)
  • A-B Landsteiner 1900
  • Rh Levine, Stetson 1939
  • Succesful transfusion Transplantation
  • Others Bone, Tissue-engineering, etc
  • Transplantation
  • Organ Transplantation

8
Types
  • Autologous graft (autograft) within an
    individual, autotransplantation
  • Syngeneic graft (syngraft, isograft) identical
    twins, isotransplantation
  • Allogeneic graft (allograft, homograft)
    non-identical, allotransplantation
  • Xenogeneic graft (heterologous graft,
    heterograft) between species,
    xenotransplantation

9
(No Transcript)
10
Classification of Renal Transplantation
  • Auto-RT
  • Cadaveric
  • Allograft RT Living
    related
  • Living Donor

  • Living unrelated
  • Xenograft RT (In experimental)

11
Transplantation History
  • experimental kidney transplantation -1912
  • Alexis Carel-Nobel prize
  • 1935 human kidney transplant in Russia -
    rejection
  • P.B. Medawar (1945) skin grafts
  • Self skin accepted
  • Relative not accepted ! ? What is the
    difference ?
  • ? Immunologic mechanism
  • A. Mitchison (1950)
  • Lymphocytes are responsible for rejection

12
Transplantation History
  • Peter Gorer (1935)
  • Identification of 4 group of genes for RBC
  • Gorer and Gorge Snell (1950)
  • Group II antigens are responsible for rejection
  • ? Major HistoCompatibility genes (HLA)
  • Nobel prize 1980 George Snell
  • 1954 Succesful kidney transplant between
    identical twins in Boston Peter Bent Brigham
    Hospital
  • Joseph Murray 1991 Nobel prize

13
HISTORY OF THE RT
  • 1933 First clinical RT (Voronov)
  • 1954 First long-term successful RT(Twin)
  • 1958 Discovery of HLA(Human Lym Antigen)
  • 1959 Radiation be used for immunosupp-
  • ression
  • 1961 Azathioprine (Aza)
  • 1962 Prednisolone Tissue Matching
  • 1966 Cross-Matching
  • Late 1960 Preservation the Kidneygt24hr
  • 1972 First successful RT(LRD) in china
  • 1978 Clinical use of Cyclosporine(CsA).

14
Key factors for succesful transplantation
  • Knowledge of MHC haplotypes
  • Effective immunosuppression
  • Ability to identify and treat infections
  • Available donors

15
Applications of allografting transplantation
16
The importance of transplantation
17
Clinical Organ Transplantation
  • Liver Transplantation
  • Renal Transplantation

18
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
  • Indication End stage liver diseases (ESLD)
  • Hepatic Disease to ESLD
  • Congenital malfomation
  • Congenital liver metabolic disorders
  • Acute liver failure
  • Chronic liver failure
  • (1) Cirrhosis Hepatitis B, Alcoholic
  • (2) Parasites Hydatid disease of liver, ect.
  • liver malignance

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
END STAGE RENAL DISEASES (ESRD)
RENAL TRANSPLANTATION
  • Definition
  • (1) Various causes
  • (2) Irreversible injury
  • (3) Functional failure.
  • Morbidity
  • Europe 50/million
  • China 90-100/million

28
TREATMENT OF ESRD
  • DIALYSIS
  • Chronic Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
    (CAPD)
  • Hemodialysis (HD).
  • KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

29
Renal Transplantation
  • Renal transplantation is associated with as
    survival benefit for patients with ESRD when
    compared to dialysis
  • Even marginal donor kidneys confer a significant
    survival advantage over maintenance dialysis.
  • The preferred therapy for most of the Pts with
    ESRD
  • More cost- effective Better survival Better
    life quality.

30
CONTRAINDICATION
  • Active invasive infection
  • Active malignance
  • High probability of operative mortality
  • Unsuitable anatomic situation for technical
    success
  • Severe psychological or financial problem.

31
Pre-OP Selection
  • ABO Blood Group Compatible
  • Cytotoxicity Test
  • Donor Lymphocyte Recipient Serum
  • Cross matching
  • Donor Lymphocyte Recipient Serum
  • Donor Serum Recipients Lymphocyte
  • Mixed Lymphocyte Culture
  • Tissue typing (HLA)

32
OPERATION
  • DONOR
  • (1) Living donor
  • Nephrectomy via flank approach
  • Nephrectomy via Laparoscope.

33
(No Transcript)
34
  • (2) Cadaveric Donor
  • Total midline incision
  • in situ flashing Euro-collins/UW solution
  • Bilateral radical nephrectomy.
  • Low temperature preservation.

35
Potential Advantages of living versus cadaveric
kidney donor
  • Better short-term result(about 95 versus 90
    1-yr function)
  • Better long-term results(half-life of 12-20 yr
    versus 8-9 yr)
  • More consistent early function and easy of
    management

36
Potential Advantages of living versus cadaveric
kidney donor
  • Avoidance of brain death stress
  • Minimal incidence of delayed graft function
  • Avoidance of long wait for cadaveric transplant

37
Potential Advantages of living versus cadaveric
kidney donor
  • Capacity of time transplantation for medical and
    personal convenience
  • Immunosuppressive regime may be less aggressive
  • Help relieve stress on national cadaver donor
    supply
  • Emotional gain to donor.

38
Potential disadvantages of live donation
  • Psychological stress to donor and family
  • Inconvenience and risk of evaluation
    process(i.e., intravenous contrast)
  • Operative mortality(about 1 in 2000 Pts.)
  • Major post operative complications (about 2 of
    Pts.)

39
Potential disadvantages of live donation
  • Minor postoperative complications(up to 50 of
    Pts.)
  • Long-term morbidity(possible mild hyper-tention
    and proteinuria)
  • Risk for traumatic injury to remaining kidney
  • Risk for unrecognized covert chronic renal
    disease.

40
Recipient Operation
Extraperitoneally in the contralateral iliac
fossa via Gibson incision.
Why contralateral ?
41
RECIPIENT OPERATION
  • Blood Vessel Anastomosis
  • Donor renal V Recipientsexternal iliac V
  • Donor renal A Recipients internal iliac
    A
  • Ureter Anastomosis
  • Donor ureter Recipients bladder
  • Anti-reflux anastomosis

42
(No Transcript)
43
Clinical phases of rejection
  • Hyperacute rejection (minutes to hours)
  • Preexisting antibodies to donor HLA antigens
  • Complement activation, macrophages
  • Accelerated rejection
  • Acute rejection (around 10 days to 30 days)
  • Cellular mechanism (CD4, CD8, NK, Macrophages)
  • Chronic rejection (months to years !!)
  • Mixed humoral and cellular mechanism
  • CHRONIC REJECTION IS STILL HARD TO MANAGE !

44
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
  • Immunosuppresents play a very impor-tant role in
    organ transplantation
  • Immuosuppresents extremely increase the effect
    and the survival rate of organ transplantation

45
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
  • Immunosuppresents are a double - edged sword
  • the most important thing is to increase their
    positive effects, and in the same time decrease
    their side effects (i.e., organ toxicity,
    infection, tumors, ect.).

46
Diagnosis of rejection
  • Symptom/Sign
  • fever
  • urinary output ?
  • graft tenderness
  • graft size ?
  • hypertension
  • myalgia/arthragia.

47
Laboratory Test
  • Serum creatine, SCr
  • Urinary creatine, Ucr
  • Color doppler scan
  • radiorenogram
  • Ateriogram
  • Biopsy
  • (1) Fine needle aspiration biopsy
  • (FNAB)
  • (2) Core needle biopsy(CNB).

48
Treatment of kidney rejection
  • Hyperacute (Sometimes during the operation !)
  • No therapy, usually results in graft failure
    kidney should be removed
  • Acute (Most frequently in the first 4 weeks)
  • BIOPSY !
  • Increase immunosuppression
  • Increase steroid dose
  • Increase cyclosporin (monitor serum level !)
  • ATG, ALG, OKT3
  • Chronic
  • ACE inhibitors, prostacyclin analog drugs
  • Steroid, Imuran, Cellcept

49
Transplantation Immunology
50
(No Transcript)
51
Histocompatibility Antigens
  • Major histocompatibility antigens
  • MHC class I molecules almost all nucleated
    cells
  • MHC class II molecules APCs, endothelium of
    renal arteries and glomeruli
  • Minor histocompatibility antigens H-Y molecule

52
Major histocompatibility antigens
  • Human leukocytic Antigen
  • HLA I. (a1, a2, a3, ß2-microglobulin)
  • Gene-Code alleles A, B, C loci
  • HLA II. (a1, a2, ß1, ß2)
  • Gene-Code alleles DP, DQ, DR loci
  • HLA III.
  • Gene-Code alleles C4A, TNF, HSP70
  • MHC complex Gene

53
Major histocompatibility antigens
  • MHC loci are highly polymorphic
  • Many alternative alleles at a locus
  • The loci are closely linked to each other
  • A set of alleles is called a HAPLOTYPE
  • One inherites a haplotype from mother and another
    from father
  • The alleles are codominantly expressed

54
Inheritance of MHC alleles
Mother
Father
A/B
C/D
A/C A/D B/C B/D
A/R1 R2/C R2/R1
Possible children of parents with HLA haplotype
A/B and C/D
R1C-D recombination R2A-B recombination
55
Induction of Immune Responses Against Transplants
  • alloantigens and xenoantigens antigens that
    serve as the targets of rejection
  • the antibodies and T cells that react against
    these antigens are said to be alloreactive and
    xenoreactive, respectively.
  • allorecognition
  • direct
  • indirect

56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
Rejection
  • Senzitization stage
  • Not needed in hyperacute reactions !
  • Effector stage
  • Alloantibodies bind to endothelium, activate the
    complement system, and injure graft blood vessels

59
Rejection
  • Effector stage (Mostly cellular mechanism)
  • Alloreactive T cells recruit and activate
    macrophages ---gt DTH response delayed type
    hypersensitivity
  • Alloreactive CTLs CTL mediated cytotoxicity lyse
    graft endothelial and parenchymal cells directly
  • ADCC
  • CD4, CD8 lymphocytes, NK cells, macrophages

60
Rejection
From Kuby IMMUNOLOGY (fourth edition, 2000)
61
Tissue typing
  • Microcytotoxicity assay
  • Known antibody to WBCs of donor / recipient
  • Complement mediated lysis if Ab present on cell
    surface
  • Mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC)
  • Irradiated donor lymphocytes (stimulants)
  • Incubated with recipient lymphocytes
  • 3H Thymidin incorporatin measured
  • Flow cytometry cross typing
  • DNA analysis
  • Genomic typing (very precise, many subtipes)

62
Hyperacute Rejection
  • Occurs within minutes of transplantation
  • Pre-existing IgM (natural) antibodies against
  • ABO blood group antigens
  • less well-characterized antigens in xenograft
  • alloantigen, such as foreign MHC molecules, or
    alloantigen expressed on vasular endothelial
    cells

63
Hyperacute Graft Rejection
64
Acute Rejection
  • Occurs within days or weeks after transplantation
  • Acute vascular rejection
  • Necrosis of cells of the graft blood vessels
    (vasculitis)
  • Mediated by IgG antibodies against endothelial
    cell alloantigens and complement activation

65
Acute Rejection
  • Acute cellular rejection
  • Necrosis of parenchymal cells with lymphocyte and
    macrophage infiltrates
  • Effector mechanisms
  • CTLs
  • Activated macrophages
  • Natural killer cells

66
Acute Cellular Rejection
67
Chronic Rejection
  • Occurs over months or years
  • Fibrosis with loss of normal organ structures
  • Wound healing following the cellular necrosis
  • A form of chronic DTH or a response to chronic
    ischemia caused by injury to blood vessels

68
Prevention and Treatment of Allograft Rejection1
  • Immunosuppression
  • drugs that inhibit or kill T lymphocytes
  • toxins that kill proliferating T cells
  • antibodies that deplete or inhibit T cells
  • anti-inflammatory agents

69
Prevention and Treatment of Allograft Rejection2
  • Reduce the immunogenicity of allografts
  • ABO blood group typing
  • HLA typing and matching
  • induce donor-specific tolerance
  • blood transfusion

70
(No Transcript)
71
Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
  • Occurs in bone marrow recipients
  • Initiated by T cell recognition of host
    alloantigens
  • The effector cells are less well defined NK
    cells, CD8 CTLs, cytokines

72
Acute GVHD
  • Epithelial cell necrosis
  • Skin
  • Liver
  • The gastrointestinal tract
  • Characterized by skin rash, jaundice and diarrhea

73
Acute GVH
74
Immunosuppressive therapy 1.
  • Allogenic transplantation always require
    immunosuppressive therapy
  • Most of the drugs available are non-specific
  • Common side effects of therapy
  • Infection
  • Cancer
  • Bone-marrow depression

75
Immunosuppression 2.
  • Conventional drugs (1st phase)
  • Steroids /Prednisone/ (0.1-10 mg / kg)
  • Azathioprine /Imuran/ (0.5-3 mg/ kg)
  • Cyclophosphamide (0.5-20 mg/ kg)
  • Methotrexate (0.1-0.3 mg/ kg)

76
Immunosuppression 3.
  • New drugs (1)
  • CYCLOSPORIN A (REVOLUTION !)
  • 2-8 mg/ kg
  • FK506 tacrolimus /PROGRAF/
  • Sirolimus - rapamycin
  • Gusperimus - dezoxyspergualin

77
Effects of cyclosporins
  • Receptor cytoplasmic immunophillin
  • calcineurin blockage ? NF-Atc
  • Rapamycin also binds to immunophillin, but
  • the complex does not block calcineurin, it
    blocks proliferation in G1 phase.
  • Highly lymphocyte specific. IL-2 action is
    impaired.
  • T lymphocyte (Th) is blocked.

78
Immunosuppression 4.
  • Purin antagonists
  • IMURAN
  • CELLCEPT (micophenolate mofetil)
  • Mizoribin bredinin
  • Pirimidin antagonists
  • Sodium-brequinar (highly lymphocyte specific)

79
Monoclonal antibodies
  • OKT3 (Anti CD3 mAb)
  • CD3 T cells
  • Anti-TAC (anti-IL2 receptor)
  • Activated T lymphocytes
  • Anti-CD4
  • Anti-LFA1 anti-ICAM-1 experimental
  • Anti-cytokine (IL-2, TNFa, IFN?)

80
Problems of Transplantation
  • There are not enough organs
  • At least 150,000 patients in industrially
    developed countries badly need donor organs and
    tissues
  • Every 14 minutes another name is added to the
    national transplant waiting list.
  • About 16 people die because of the lack of
    available organs for transplant each day.
  • Rejection
  • When the immune system of the host detects
    foreign graft tissue, it launches an attack,
    resulting in tissue rejection

81
Gene technology may as a solution
  • Gene technology offers the possibility to breed
    the desired organs in animals.
  • Lack of organs is no longer a problem
  • Gene technology makes it possible to humanize the
    bred organs - the immune system identifies the
    organ as its own tissue.
  • Immune system rejection is prevented

82
From which animals are we able to transplant
organs
3. The Pig Surprisingly similar to our anatomy
and physiology
1. The Chimpanzee Its DNA sequence differs from
ours by only 2
2. The Baboon Its organs are too small for a
large adult human
83
  • Organ breeding
  • A transgenic animal carries a foreign gene
    inserted into its genome.
  • The transgenic animal shows the specific
    characteristics which are coded on the inserted
    gene
  • ? A gene which is responsible for the
    construction of a human organ makes the organism
    produce the organ additionally.

84
The insert of a foreign gene into an animal
I. DNA microinjection The DNA is inserted into
the cell with a small syringe
II. Retrovirus gene transfer The DNA is carried
into a cell by a virus.
85
Suppression of immune system rejection
  • The genes which are responsible for the own
    tissue not being rejected can be injected into an
    animal embryo
  • the organs of which are then similar to the ones
    of the human.
  • It is possible to humanize the bred organs by
    making certain genetic modifications.
  • Then the organs are accepted by the immune
    system.

86
Conclusion
  • Transplantation provides us the means of
    restoring the function of a nonfunctional organ.
  • In the case of BMT it enables us to administer
    such high doses of chemotherapy that would
    destroy the BM as well as the residual tumor.
  • A lot immunologic knowledge had to be collected
    to understand what is happening.

87
Conclusion
  • HLA typing and matching is essential for
    allografting transplantation.
  • Effective immunosuppressive therapy (Cyclosporin)
    revolutionised organ transplantation.
  • The future is to transplant cells, that would
    restore the function of the affected organ.
  • Gene therapy is growing, and will cause another
    revolution like cyclosporin did in the 1980s.

88
To seek what everybody has sought To think what
nobody has thought Try your best, everything
will be possible
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com