motivation existence alone is not success . it s a lot more - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

motivation existence alone is not success . it s a lot more

Description:

motivation existence alone is not success . it s a lot more ! success results from inspiration, aspiration, desperation and perspiration . – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: mtrsiComy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: motivation existence alone is not success . it s a lot more


1
MOTIVATION
  • EXISTENCE ALONE IS NOT SUCCESS.
  • ITS A LOT MORE !
  • SUCCESS RESULTS FROM INSPIRATION, ASPIRATION,
    DESPERATION AND PERSPIRATION.

2
MEANING AND DEFINITIONS
  • Motivation is like food for the brain. It needs
    continual and regular top up.
  • Motivation is a process which begins with a
    physiological or psychological need or deficiency
    which triggers behaviour or a drive that is aimed
    at a goal or an incentive.

Needs Drives
Incentives
3
MEANING AND DEFINITIONS
  • Motivation is one of the key ingredients in
    employee performance and productivity.
    Individuals may not get the job done without
    sufficient motivation though they are provided
    with right objectives, supportive work
    environment and the right skills.
  • Motivation is the latest challenge that is faced
    by the employers and these challenges have come
    due to restructuring of organisation,
    re-engineering, globalisation and information
    technology.

4
MEANING AND DEFINITIONS
  • Motivation is derived from the Latin word
    movere which means to move. And it is the
    motive an inner state of mind that energises,
    activates or moves and directs behaviour towards
    goals.
  • Motivation refers to the forces within a person
    that affects his or her direction, intensity and
    persistence of voluntary behaviour.

5
MEANING AND DEFINITIONS
  • According to Dalton E. McFarland,
  • Motivation refers to the way in which urges,
    drives, desires, aspirations, strivings or needs
    influence the choice of alternatives in the
    behaviour of human beings.
  • According to Stephen P. Robbins,
  • Motivation represents an unsatisfied need,
    which creates a state of tension or
    disequilibrium causing the individual to move in
    a goal directed pattern towards restoring a state
    of equilibrium by satisfying the need.

6
MEANING AND DEFINITIONS
  • Motivation is getting people to do what you want
    them to do because they want to do it -
    Dwight D. Eisenhower
  • Motivation is the willingness to exert high level
    of efforts towards organizational goals,
    conditioned by the efforts ability to satisfy
    some individual needs

7
MOTIVATION PROCESS
NEED DRIVES GOALS
SATISFACTION (Deficiency) (Direction)
(Fulfilling) (Reduction in
drives)
8
  • NEED Need is deficiency. Needs are created
    whenever there is a physiological or
    psychological imbalance.
  • DRIVE Drive is deficiency with direction. They
    enhance the goal accomplishment through actions.

9
  • GOALS Goals are generally interpreted as
    incentives and anything that will alleviate a
    need to reduce a drive is called an incentive.
  • SATISFACTION The goal achievement requires a
    clear direction and the direction enhances the
    level and quality of output. The individual
    derives the ultimate satisfaction only if the
    goals are achieved.

10
NATURE OR CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTIVATION
  • i) Energetic force
  • ii) An internal feeling
  • iii) Intervening variable
  • iv) Work related behaviour
  • v) Positive or negative
  • vi) Equilibrium
  • vii) Complex process

11
  • Energetic force Motivation is a momentum for
    doing something which may originate within or
    beyond an individual. It is a urge to
    accomplish a task.
  • An internal feeling Motivation is an inner state
    that energises, activates, or moves and that
    directs or channels behaviour towards goals.
  • Intervening variable Motivation is an internal
    psychological process which is not directly
    observable and which account for behaviour from
    behaviour. It cannot be seen but can only be
    inferred from behaviour.

12
  • Work related behaviour Motivation directs
    behaviour towards some goal, work or action. It
    influences human behaviour to perform. It creates
    work environment on the part of individuals.
  • Positive or negative Positive motivation is
    based on rewards, praise, pride, participation
    and growth. Negative motivation, on the other
    hand, is based on force of fear and punishment.

13
  • Equilibrium According to Chester Bernard,
    motivation is in the form inducement-contribution
    theory. It motivates workers and organisations
    to find what payouts (inducements) to workers in
    exchange for what degree of co-operation
    (contributions) from workers will be satisfactory
    to both the parties. Thus motivation cannot
    happen without this equilibrium.

14
  • Complex process This is evident from the
    following reasons.
  • A) Motivation is hypothetical construct, as it is
    not seen.
  • B) Motivation is an individual phenomenon.
  • C) Humans are not consciously aware of their
    desires.
  • D) People have different ways to satisfy their
    needs.
  • E) Motivation is rarely traceable to a single
    motive etc.

15
THEORIES OF MOTIVATION
  • 1) MASLOWS NEED HIERARCHY THEORY
  • 2) ALDERFERS ERG THEORY
  • 3) McGREGORS X AND Y THEORY
  • 4) HERZBERGS TWO FACTOR THEORY
  • 5) McCLELLANDS ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION THEORY

16
  • 6) VICTOR VROOMS EXPECTANCY THEORY
  • 7) PORTER LAWLERS THEORY
  • 8) EQUITY THEORY
  • 9) GOAL SETTING THEORY
  • 10)ATTRIBUTION THEORY
  • 11)OUCHIS Z THEORY

17
MASLOWS NEED HIERARCHY THEORY
  • This theory was proposed by Abraham Maslow.
    Maslow postulates that people in work environment
    are motivated to perform by a desire to satisfy a
    set of internal needs. His framework is based on
    the following fundamental assumptions
  • i) peoples needs influence their behaviour,
  • ii) peoples needs exert5 a powerful effect on
    the individuals thinking and behaviour,
  • iii) once one need is satisfied, another need
    emerges and demands satisfaction,
  • iv) the lowest unsatisfied need has the greatest
    motivational potential.

18
MASLOWS NEED HIERARCHY THEORY
SELF ACTUALISATION
SELF - ESTEEM
SOCIAL/ BELONGING NEEDS
SAFETY SECURITY NEEDS
PHYSIOLOGICAL NEEDS
19
MASLOWS NEED HIERARCHY THEORY
  • PHYSIOLOGICAL NEEDS consists of the basic needs
    of the human body such as food, clothing, shelter
    and sex. These needs dominate all other needs.
  • SAFETY SECURITY NEEDS includes security and
    protection from physical and emotional harm, ill
    health, economic disaster and the unexpected.
  • SOCIAL/ BELONGING NEEDS includes need for
    companionship, affection, belongingness,
    acceptance and love. Non satisfaction of these
    needs may affect the mental health of the
    individual.

20
MASLOWS NEED HIERARCHY THEORY
  • SELF ESTEEM NEEDS includes internal esteem
    (awareness of ones importance to others) factors
    such as self- respect, autonomy and achievement
    and external factors such as status, recognition
    and attention. The satisfaction of these needs
    leads to self confidence and prestige.
  • SELF ACTUALISATION is the desire to become more
    and more what one is, to become one is capable of
    becoming. It includes growth, achieving ones
    potential and self fulfillment. The satisfaction
    of self actualization needs is possible only
    after the satisfaction of all other needs.

21
ALDERFERS ERG THEORY
  • CLAYTON ALDERFER proposed this ERG theory by
    grouping human needs into three categories viz.
  • E Existence, R Relatedness, G Growth.
  • EXISTENCE NEEDS include individuals
    physiological and safety needs i.e. the need for
    food, clothing, shelter, fringe benefits and
    better working conditions.
  • RELATEDNESS NEEDS include how individuals develop
    the need to interact with other individuals and
    to acquire public recognition and have an
    interpersonal security.

22
ALDERFERS ERG THEORY.
  • GROWTH NEEDS explain the individuals self-esteem
    through personal achievement and the concept of
    self actualisation.
  • ERG theory explains that an individuals
    behaviour could be motivated simultaneously by
    more than one need. Alderfer also states that one
    could satisfy the growth needs even though the
    related needs are not met.
  • The ERG theory can help managers to gain an
    insight into employees behaviour because of the
    assumptions it holds that individuals are
    motivated to adopt a behaviour to satisfy one of
    the three sets of needs.

23
McGREGORS X AND Y THEORY
  • Douglas McGregor assume d that motivating people
    involves certain assumptions about human nature.
    It involves certain assumptions, generalisations
    and hypothesis relating human behaviour and human
    nature. These set of assumptions serve the
    purpose of predicting human behaviour. These are
    merely intuitive deductions and not based on any
    research findings.

24
  • Theory X represents old stereotyped and
    authoritarian management style of motivation. It
    is based on the following assumptions
  • i) by nature man is lazy and dislikes work,
  • ii) lacks ambition, dislikes responsibility
    and prefers to be directed,
  • iii) self centred and indifferent to
    organisational goals,
  • iv) needs to be closely controlled,
  • v) motivation occurs at psychological and
    safety needs,

25
  • vi) management must organise for factors of
    production,
  • vii) average man is generally passive and
    resistant to organisational needs.
  • This shows the negative assumptions of human
    behaviour. Hence the carrot and stick approach of
    motivation needs to be followed.

26
  • McGregor suggested a counter approach to
    motivation which is called Theory Y. he
    recognised some factors that theory X fails to
    take into account. This theory is based on the
    following assumptions
  • i) that the average person is active and does
    not inherently dislike work,
  • ii) seeks responsibility and learns under proper
    condition to accept the responsibility,
  • iii) self directed, self controlled and
    creative,
  • iv) motivation occurs at higher level needs,
    though unsatisfied lower needs are important,

27
  • v) there is capacity to exercise high degree of
    imagination. ingenuity and creativity is
    solving problems though widely distributed.
  • Theory Y suggests the modern approach of
    motivation. It emphasises on the democratic and
    participative style of leadership. The most
    important contribution of this theory is the
    commitment of workers towards organisational
    goals, cooperation and coordination in work. It
    leads to decentralisation of authority, job
    enrichment, participative leadership and two way
    communication system to create a better
    environment.

28
HERZBERGS TWO FACTOR THEORY
  • FREDERICK HERZBERG, extended the work of Maslow
    and developed this theory. This is also called as
    Dual Structure Theory. According to this theory,
    there two factors called MOTIVATORS and HYGIENE
    that lead to employees satisfaction or
    dissatisfaction.
  • Motivators are identified as growth, recognition,
    responsibility, advancement and achievement.
  • Hygiene is referred to job security, company
    policies, working conditions, supervisor
    relations and co-worker relations.

29
HERZBERGS TWO FACTOR THEORY
  • In 1950, Herzberg conducted a motivational study
    on about 200 accountants and engineers using a
    critical incident method for data collection
    which resulted in following conclusions
  • i) Different sets of needs play different roles
    in the overall process of motivation and
    satisfaction in organisations.

30
HERZBERGS TWO FACTOR THEORY
  • ii) The factors leading to job satisfaction are
    separate and distinct from those that lead to
    job dissatisfaction.
  • iii) Job satisfaction is not a unidimensional
    concept. Thus, to eliminate factors that create
    job dissatisfaction can bring about peace, but
    cannot necessarily motivate.

31
HERZBERGS TWO FACTOR THEORY
  • The Herzbergs research revealed two distinct
    types of motivational factors as under
  • 1) MOTIVATORS OR SATISFIERS There is set of
    intrinsic (internal) job conditions which can
    result in good job performance and can build a
    strong level of motivation. If these conditions
    are not present, they do not result
    dissatisfaction. They are associated with job
    experiences and job content. They are job
    centred and create a challenge and opportunity
    for achievement and growth. They are roughly
    equivalent to Maslows higher level needs.

32
HERZBERGS TWO FACTOR THEORY
  • 2) HYGIENE FACTORS OR DISSATISFIERS
  • There is a set of extrinsic (external) job
    conditions which result in dissatisfaction among
    employees when they are not present.
  • But if these conditions are present, this does
    not necessarily motivate employees.

33
HERZBERGS TWO FACTOR THEORY
  • Hygiene factors are associated with the
    surrounding or peripheral aspects of the job
    the job context.
  • They are preventive and environmental in nature
    and are needed to maintain at least a level of
    no dissatisfaction.
  • Although they seem to be important in preventing
    dissatisfaction, by themselves they do not
    motivate or lead to satisfaction.

34
HERZBERGS TWO FACTOR THEORY
  • HYGIENE FACTORS (DISSATISFIERS)
  • Job context
  • Company policy and administration.
  • Supervision
  • Salary
  • Interpersonal relations
  • Working conditions.
  • MOTIVATORS (SATISFIERS)
  • Job content
  • Achievement
  • Recognition
  • Work itself
  • Responsibility
  • Advancement.

35
McCLELLANDS ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION THEORY
  • This theory was proposed by DAVID McCLELLAND.
  • He refers that apart from the primary needs,
    individuals have secondary needs that are
    learned. The secondary needs are learned and
    reinforced through parental styles, childhood
    learning and social norms. He argues that
    individuals could be motivated through these
    learned needs. The learned needs are
  • Need for achievement
  • Need for affiliation and
  • Need for power.

36
McCLELLANDS ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION THEORY
  • Need for achievement
  • Individuals with higher need for achievement will
    take up challenging goals. These individuals do
    not prefer to work in teams. They have a higher
    responsibility in order to reach their goals.
    These individuals are generally satisfied only
    when they are given a challenging job, with due
    recognition and feedback from the managers.

37
McCLELLANDS ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION THEORY
  • Need for affiliation
  • This is similar to Maslows safety and
    belongingness needs. An individual high on the
    need of affiliation wish to seek recognition from
    others and likes more of dealing with
    interpersonal relationship. In order to seek for
    positive relationship these individuals generally
    avoid conflicts. They participate in general
    meetings and social gatherings. This need could
    also be related to Alderfers relatedness need.

38
McCLELLANDS ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION THEORY
  • Need for power
  • The ability to induce or influence others
    behaviour is called power. McClelland found that
    persons with a high power need display a great
    concern for exercising influence and control.
    They are also interested in providing status
    rewards to their followers.

39
VICTOR VROOMS EXPECTANCY THEORY
  • Vrooms theory covers the entire work environment
    while attempting to answer the question on what
    is the strength of the needs in motivating
    people at work.
  • This expectancy theory goes by the basic premise
    that employees are rational people, they think
    about what they have to do to be rewarded and how
    much the rewards mean to them before they perform
    their jobs.

40
VICTOR VROOMS EXPECTANCY THEORY.
  • This theory is based on the assumptions namely
  • i) it is a combination of both individual
    (expectations about their jobs based on their
    needs, motivations etc.) and the environment (the
    organisation) which will influence how people
    behave in organisations. And these could change
    over a period of time.
  • ii) individuals consciously make their own
    decisions (coming to work, staying with the same
    firm etc.)

41
VICTOR VROOMS EXPECTANCY THEORY.
  • This theory is based on four assumptions viz..
  • a) It is a combination of both individual
    (expectations about their jobs based on their
    needs, motivations, etc.) and the environment
    (the organisation) which will influence how
    people behave in organisations. And these could
    also change over period of time.

42
VICTOR VROOMS EXPECTANCY THEORY.
  • b) Individuals consciously make their own
    decisions (coming to work, staying with the same
    firm etc) even though there may be many
    constraints placed on their behaviour (working
    norms, rules etc).
  • c) People expect different rewards from their
    work depending on their different needs and
    goals.
  • d) Individuals take decisions based on their
    perceptions about what will be the desired
    outcome of a specific behaviour.

43
VICTOR VROOMS EXPECTANCY THEORY.
  • Vroom has built this theory on three concepts
    Valence, Instrumentality and Expectancy.
  • So this approach is also called as VIE theory.
  • Vroom has referred to the result of behaviours
    associated with doing the job itself as First
    Level Outcomes (ex. Level of performance, quality
    of work, amount of absenteeism).

44
  • The Second Level Outcomes are said to be the
    rewards (either positive or negative) the first
    level outcomes are likely to produce (ex. An
    increase in pay, promotion, job security,
    acceptance by colleagues).

45
  • VALENCE
  • The strength of an individuals preference for a
    particular outcome (second level) is called
    Valence. Outcomes having a positive valence could
    take the form of gaining respect from friends and
    colleagues, performing meaningful work, feeling
    of job security, earning enough to maintain a
    family.

46
  • Outcomes having negative valence are instances
    one could want to avoid such as being given a
    golden hand shake, being passed over for
    promotion or discharged on grounds of improper
    behaviour at work place (sexual harassment etc).
    Outcome is positive when it is preferred by the
    individual and negative when it is not preferred
    and the individual tries to avoid it.

47
  • INSTRUMENTALITY
  • This refers to the relationship between first
    level outcome and second level outcomes and the
    values ranging from -1 to 1.
  • -1 implies that the attainment of a second level
    outcome is inversely related to the achievement
    of a first level outcome. For instance, Mr. A to
    be accepted as member of a work group has to have
    level of performance, in which case A will ensure
    that he will not violate the groups norm.

48
  • 1 indicates that the first level outcome is
    positively related to the second level outcome.
    When a student receives a A grade in the final
    exam, the chance of him achieving the second
    level outcome (clearing the exams with
    distinction) approaches 1.

49
  • EXPECTANCY
  • This refers to the belief that a particular level
    of effort will be followed by a particular level
    of performance. The expectancy may vary from the
    belief that there is absolutely no relationship
    between effort and performance to the surety that
    a certain level of effort will result in a
    corresponding level of performance.

50
  • The expectancy has a value ranging from 0 (no
    chances that a first level outcome will occur
    after the behaviour) to 1 ( the certainty or
    surety that a particular first level outcome will
    be the result of a particular be behaviour).

51
PORTER LAWLERS THEORY
  • Porter Lawler made an effort to refine and
    extend Vrooms model to try to understand the
    relationships between satisfaction and
    performance.
  • They opined that motivation is not equal to
    satisfaction or performance. According to them,
    motivation, satisfaction and performance are
    separate variables and relate in different ways
    as compared to what was assumed traditionally.

52
PORTER LAWLERS THEORY.
  • According to this approach, effort do not
    directly lead to performance and is mediated or
    interrupted by abilities, traits and role
    perceptions.
  • Unlike the traditional theories, this theory
    suggests that performance leads to satisfaction.
    This approach has no doubt, made significant
    contributions which has led to the better
    understanding of work motivation and the
    relationship between performance and
    satisfaction.
  • However theory is very complex and has proved to
    be a difficult in practice.

53
EQUITY THEORY
  • This theory was introduced by J. Stacy Adams. It
    works on two assumptions
  • a) People evaluate their interpersonal
    relationships just as exchange process in which
    they make contributions and expect certain
    results.
  • b) Individuals tend to compare their situations
    to those of others to determine the equity of an
    exchange.
  • Stacy Adams opines that people compare themselves
    with others based on two variables i.e. outcomes
    and inputs.

54
EQUITY THEORY
  • Inputs represent what an individual contributes
    to an exchange and Outputs are what an individual
    receives from the exchange. Both inputs and
    outputs here are based on the persons
    perception.
  • Equity theory includes that individuals compare
    their outcomes and inputs with those of others
    and judge their equality of these relationships
    in the form of a ratio. Later they compare the
    ratios of their own outcomes / input to the
    ratios of others outcomes/ inputs.

55
EQUITY THEORY
  • But these comparisons occur only when individuals
    are working in the same area or domain.
  • Ex. Jack Jill Rs 500/- Rs 350/- per day for
    the same job having equal trait, where one feels
    happy and other disappointed.

56
GOAL SETTING THEORY
  • Goals can be defined as future outcomes /
    results that individuals and groups desire and
    strive to achieve. Goal setting is the process
    through which efficiency and effectiveness can be
    increased by specifying the desired outcomes
    towards which individuals, teams, departments and
    organisations should work.
  • Goal setting process is one of the most important
    motivational tools having an impact on the
    performance of employees in organisation.

57
GOAL SETTING THEORY.
  • Goals setting is the process of developing,
    negotiating and establishing goals which will be
    challenging enough to structure the individuals
    time and effort.
  • The key attributes of goals are

58
  • GOAL DIFFICULTY A good goal should be
    challenging at the same time not too easy, nor
    should it be too difficult.
  • GOAL CLARITY The goal should be clear and
    specific enough to direct the efforts of the
    individual in the desired direction.
  • SELF EFFICACY The goal should be set such that
    the individual is able to perform the task at the
    desired level.

59
ATTRIBUTION THEORY
  • Attributions play an important role in the
    cognitive processes of an individual.
    Attributions which people make have emerged as an
    important indicator for work motivation.
  • The Attributions theory works on the basis of the
    relationship between personal perception and
    interpersonal behaviour than as a theory of
    individual motivation.

60
ATTRIBUTION THEORY
  • All the attributions theories share the following
    same assumptions
  • Individuals tend to seek and make sense of the
    world.
  • We tend to attribute peoples actions to internal
    or external causes.
  • And this is done in logical ways.

61
WILLIAM OUCHIS THEORY Z
  • William ouchis theory Z captures the best in
    management methods from the US and Japanese
    approaches. Ouchi has made a comparative analysis
    in theory Z.
  • Japanese management can be characterised by
    life-time employment, emphasis on group, concern
    for employees, collective decision making and
    role of top management as a facilitator. While
    American practices include short term
    employment, rapid advancement, personal decision
    making, individual responsibility, segmented
    concern for employees and specialisation in
    career.

62
  • This is a Hybrid type of system which
    incorporates the strengths of Japanese management
    practices and American management practices.
  • In fact, Z does not stand for anything. It is
    merely the last letter of the alphabet. Actually,
    theory Z is not a theory. It is a label
    interchangeable with type Z.
  • William Ouchi described the following feature
    under the caption of Z.
  • i) strong bond between organisation and
    employees,
  • ii) employees participation,

63
  • iii) mutual trust,
  • iv) no formal organisation structure,
  • v) human resource development,
  • vi) informal control system.
  • Thus theory Z provides a complete transformation
    of motivational aspect of employees. It is a
    comprehensive philosophy of management. It rather
    involves a complex amalgamation of management
    principles and techniques for obtaining the
    maximum co-operation of the employees.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com