Rational Choice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Rational Choice

Description:

George H. W. Bush, Republican. 168 39,102,282. H. Ross Perot, Independent . . . 19,741,048 ... George W. Bush, Republican. 271 50,456,169. Al Gore, Democrat ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: michael262
Category:
Tags: bush | choice | george | rational

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rational Choice


1
  • Session 8
  • Rational Choice

2
Rational Ignorance
  • The Founders envisioned a face-to-face,
    deliberative democracy
  • They also assumed that it would be representative
    in that elites would govern on behalf of the
    mass public

3
Rational Ignorance
  • Trends
  • More participants in the process with access
    increasing over time
  • Direct election of senators
  • Primaries for presidents
  • The current reality, given population size and
    mass communication does not encourage
  • Face-to-face interaction
  • Participation through representatives

4
Rational Ignorance
  • Massive numbers of voters wash out the influence
    of any one person
  • Lack of face to face interaction means that there
    is no penalty for ignorance
  • Why would the rational actor bother to acquire
    information when it is much more efficient and
    cost-effective to remain ignorant?

5
Elements of the Rational Actor Model
  • Maximize utility
  • Individuals evaluate alternatives and choose the
    one they believe will benefit them the most
  • They act in concert with this belief, in order to
    produce the benefit
  • Actors calculate utility individually, not
    collectively

6
The Paradox of (Not) Voting
The Famed Palm Beach Ballot
7
Yogi Berra Social Scientist
  • Asked if he wanted to
  • go to a restaurant that
  • had once been a
  • favorite, he said
  • Nah, nobody goes
  • there anymore
  • its too crowded!

8
Why Vote? Why Not Vote?Why Ask Why?
  • Is Voting a Good Thing? Should We Care Whether
    Participation is High, or Low?
  • Should We Rely on Voting at All? Isnt There a
    Better Way to Make Decisions?
  • When Should We Use Direct Democracy, and When
    Should We Use Representative Democracy?

9
Downsian Model of Turnout (Downs, 1957 An
Economic Theory of Democracy)
  • Four Important Components
  • Likelihood of Influencing Outcome
  • Benefit of Having One Candidate, Rather Than the
    Other, in Office
  • Cost of Voting, or Turning Out
  • Sense of Civic Duty, or Obligation

10
Likelihood of Influencing Outcome
  • If you ask someone whether they vote, then they
    are likely to say yes, and then say that they
    vote because their vote makes a difference. But
    is that right?

11
Does Your Vote Matter?
  • The only way your vote literally matters is if,
    by voting, you change the outcome of the
    election.
  • Not the vote total, but the outcome.
  • So, your candidate must be either behind by one
    vote, or tied. Have you ever heard of that
    happening?

12
Does Your Vote Matter?
  • What is the probability of your vote mattering
    in this very precise and narrow sense?
  • (N!/N/2!?(N-N/2)!)/2N
  • If N100, then P?.08
  • If N100,000, then P?.000002

13
100,000 a small electorate!
  • How Close Are U.S. Presidential Races?
  • 1992 Elec. College Popular
  • William J. Clinton, Democrat
  • 370
    44,908,233
  • George H. W. Bush, Republican
  • 168
    39,102,282
  • H. Ross Perot, Independent
  • . . .
    19,741,048

14
How Close Are U.S. Presidential Races?
  • 1996 Elec. College Popular
  • William J. Clinton, Democrat
  • 379
    47,401,185
  • Robert Dole, Republican
  • 159
    39,197,469
  • H. Ross Perot, Reform
  • . . .
    8,085,294

15
How Close Are U.S. Presidential Races?
  • 2000 Elec. College Popular
  • George W. Bush, Republican
  • 271
    50,456,169
  • Al Gore, Democrat
  • 266
    50,996,116
  • Ralph Nader, Green
  • . . . 2,695,696

16
So, Would One Vote Change the Outcome?
  • We just had one of the narrowest elections ever,
    with the Electoral College vote margin only 5
    votes, and that was decided by only about 537
    votes in Florida.
  • Would one vote have mattered? Obviously not.
  • But then, WHY VOTE?

17
Benefit of Having One Candidate, Rather Than the
Other, in Office
  • Downs called this the net candidate
    differential.
  • Measured as the difference in satisfaction, or
    utility if one candidate takes office, compared
    to the utility if the other candidate takes
    office.
  • The measure is then net how much better is the
    good person than the bad person.

18
If the answer is, there is little difference,
then....
  • Why Vote? If the candidates are Tweedledee and
    Tweedledum, then there is no reason to vote.
    Your vote
  • has no impact on
  • the policies that
  • will be
  • implemented.

19
Cost of Voting, or Turning Out
  • Registration
  • Weather
  • Opportunity Cost of Time
  • Cost of Becoming Informed
  • Maybe Even Fear

20
Sense of Civic Duty, or Obligation
  • Why Dont You Litter? Even if you knew that you
    wouldnt be caught, lots of people wont litter
    (others will, of course!)
  • Dont want to let down my team.
  • Have to worry about feeling guilty
  • Cant complain, if I dont vote!

21
Downsian Model
  • P ? B D ? C Implies Turnout
  • Reduce Costs?
  • Increase Sense of Obligations?
  • Do We Really Want to Do That?

22
Indifference
  • Pure Indifference

Voter
Cand 1
Cand 2
23
Effective Indifference
  • P ? B lt C D
  • Indifference Curve is thick

24
Alienation
  • Both (all) candidates are so far away from what
    the voter wants that s/he feels alienated,
    distant from politics and parties

?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com