Title: Food Flows at the Community Level: Examining the Market Potential of Rabbits and Cane Rats and Impli
1Food Flows at the Community Level Examining the
Market Potential of Rabbits and Cane Rats and
Implications for Poverty Alleviation and Food
Security
- Ajuruchukwu Obi
- John Bashi
- and
- Milton Tshilamatanda
- Herman van Schalkwyk
- Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences,
- University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South
Africa
The International Food Agribusiness Management
Association World Food Agribusiness Symposium
on Re-inventing the Food Chain New Markets,
Customers, and Products, Chicago, Illinois, USA,
25-28 June, 2005
2Outline
- Introduction
- Global Demand for Animal Products
- The Place of Bushmeat (Unconventional Livestock)
- Market Potential for Rabbit Meat
- Market Potential for Cane Rat Meat
- The Supply Chains
- Conclusions
3Introduction
- African diets on aggregate continue to show gross
deficiencies in proteins, despite global
increases in demand for meat products.
- Incomes remain low across the continent.
- In South Africa,
- High unemployment rates prevail at over 40
- About 48.5 of population live below poverty
line
- Communal Areas of SA similar to conditions
elsewhere in Africa
- Protein Energy Malnutrition and chronic
undernourishment are at disturbingly high
levels.
- About 2.3m people, comprising children under the
age of 12yrs, and pregnant and lactating mothers
(87 of whom are blacks) are malnourished
(AgriReview, 1997)
4Food insecurity (undernourishment)
in Sub-Saharan Africa
Millions
Percent
250
40
Number
Proportion
35
200
30
194
184
25
150
165
168
20
125
100
15
88
10
50
5
0
0
1969-71
1979-81
1990-92
1997-99
2015
2030
Source FAO (2001), IFPRI (2001)
5Prevalence of child malnutrition in Sub-Saharan
Africa
Millions
Percent
35
40
Number
33
30
Proportion
31
35
25
26
24
20
20
30
19
19
15
10
25
5
0
20
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
1997
Source FAO (2001) IFPRI (2001)
6Per capita demand, 1997 and 2020
(in kilogram per capita)
SSA
LDCs
Meat
1997
9.8
24.6
2020
11.7
34.9
Cereals
1997
147.1
248.9
2020
162.6
274.8
Roots and tubers
1997
249.6
100.2
2020
262.7
114.4
Source Rosegrant et al. (2001) IFPRI (2001)
7Livestock and Livelihoods
- Meat from non-domesticated animals, or bushmeat,
constitutes an important element of the foods
consumed in many societies today.
- In Africa, the use of non-domesticated or wild
animals as food is well-documented for West
Africa.
- But in other parts of Africa, such as the
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), (in Southern
Africa), bushmeat is growing in importance.
- In general, bushmeat is used by households either
as a source of food, or as a source of income.
8Livestock and Livelihoods
- Limited evidence from DRC suggests that its
income value may be more important than its food
value.
- The links between poverty and bushmeat are still
not clear, but human actions that affect the
sustainability of natural resources will
ultimately have implications for poverty
reduction and sustainable livelihoods. - As a result, conservation policies often take
into account the exploitation, trade and
consumption of bushmeat.
- To that extent, the concerns of both development
specialists and environmentalists, especially
conservationists, interlock.
- But conflicts of interest often arise due to
divergent views and needs of local communities
and authorities who manage wildlife as part of
conservation programmes.
9Justification
- Need to explore low-cost investment possibilities
suited to circumstances of resource-poor
farmers.
- Growing interest in food safety.
- Strategically, important to explore alternatives
to beef, mutton, chicken and other conventional
animal protein sources especially given that SA
is net importer of meat. - Current policies to address rural poverty and
food insecurity dwell on conventional food
sources.
10RABBIT MEAT
11RABBIT MEAT PRODUCTION
12 Nutritional value of rabbit meat other common
meats
13Attributes of Rabbit
- Producing rabbit is cost-effective Rabbit has
the potential to convert waste food into meat.
- Can produce 2.7kgs of meat when fed with the same
quantity of H2O feeds needed by a cow to
produce 0.5kg of meat (Ardeng, 1999).
- Can reproduce faster than pigs, goats and sheep
(Adjare, 1984).
- A doe has the potential to deliver 6 litters in a
year and 8 bunnies within a litter (i.e. 48
bunnies a year) (Du plessis, 2000).
- Rabbit excretory can be used as manure and fur
for clothes.
14Methodology
- Taste quality of meat was evaluated using the
preference ranking developed by Basker (1988).
- It is essential to most food experiments because
it answers important questions of how food looks,
smells, feels and tastes (Campbell et al, 1987).
- Blind Tasting was performed at room temp.
(20-22C) in individual booths under red lights
in the Sensory Evaluation Laboratory.
15Material and Procedure
- 4 Meat samples chicken, beef, mutton rabbit
were evaluated by the panelists
- Samples were coded using 3 digit numbers picked
from a table of random numbers
- Panelists assigned ranks by using a scale of 1-4,
where 1 represented the most preferred and 4 the
least preferred sample
16Material and Procedure (Continued)
- No ties were allowed, i.e. no two samples could
be awarded the same numerical value
- Tap water at room temp was provided to the
panelists to rinse their mouths while tasting
between samples
17Characteristics Of Panelist
- 86 persons, drawn from Black (African), White,
and Coloured populations, participated in a blind
tasting procedure
- ARC (1995) recommends sample size of 50-100
panelists for reliable results
- Comprised 28 students and 58 staff members
- 27 of the panelists were male 59 female.
18Results(Ranking of livestock meat)
19Results (Continued)
- No product was significantly highly preferred
over the other since all the rank sum differences
were lower than the critical values at both P
0.05 and P 0.01 level of significance. - This could be attributed to the tasting panel
from broad socio-economic background while most
were familiar with 3 meat types tasted, some were
familiar with all 4 meat types. - Again this could be attributed to the flavour of
the main product which was acceptable to the
panelists.
20CANE RAT(GRASSCUTTER) Thryonomys swinderianus
21Attributes of the Cane Rat
- A bush/wild animal, also known as grass-cutter
because of its herbivorous feeding habits.
- A monogastric herbivore.
- Feeds on green forage, hay, grains, water,
agro-industrial by-products.
- On average, weighs 1.8-2.5kg (a giant cane rat
can weigh 6-10 kg.).
- Easy to feed in captivity, but obviously a less
economical feeder (wastes a lot of food).
- Has good reproductive performance up to 2
litters per year, mean litter size of 4
offspring, and fertile lifespan of up to 15
years.
22Attributes of the Cane Rat
- The meat of the cane rat is much relished in West
and Central Africa (Martin, 1985 Shwarzenberg,
Stier, Bessi Gall, 1993 Stier, Mensah Gall,
1994). - One of the few animal species not associated with
any taboos (Ajayi, 1974 and 1978 Cooper, 1995).
- The meat is a prime choice among game species
(Den Hartog and De Vos, 1973 Van de Velde,
1991).
- Grass-cutter meat is an expensive dish in African
urban restaurants (Keyle, 1987).
23Cane Rat Production and Trade
- Information is available for West and Central
Africa.
- Overall, estimated annual production in West
Africa is 80 million cane rats equivalent to
30,000 metric tons of meat.
- About half of this quantity is traded annually,
generating cash income estimated at US1,103
million.
- Despite the high degree of exploitation, cane
rats are not considered an endangered species,
and there is little restriction on their
harvesting. - They are well adapted to newly forested areas and
can thrive on food and industrial crops.
- They also do well in secondary savannahs
resulting from deforestation.
24Research in Limpopo Province of South Africa
- Six Service Centres selected in the Thohoyandou
sub-region
- Tshiombo
- Sibasa
- Damani
- Tshitereke
- Ramasaga
- Mutoti
- 200 household interviews.
- Sensory taste analysis planned.
- Situation survey completed to obtain preliminary
basis for sampling.
25Results of Situation Survey
- Issues investigated include
- Level of awareness about the use of cane rats as
meat
- Level of preference for cane rat meat to other
meat types available to the community
- Factors determining choice of cane rat meat over
other meat types available to the community
- Methods of obtaining cane rat for meat
- Willingness to pay for cane rat meat.
26(No Transcript)
27Awareness of the Food and Nutritional Value of
Cane Rats
- Five different questions were asked
- Question 1 white meat, palatable, low in
cholesterol
- Question 2 low fat but high protein meat
- Question 3 good for heart disease patients
because of low sodium,
- Question 4 recommended for coronary conditions
- Question 5 excretory matter good for vegetable
growing
28(No Transcript)
29Meat Preference Patterns
- Six most common meat types consumed in the area
- Considerations were given to both availability
and preference
- Despite being the least available, cane rats were
preferred by about 10 of the respondents.
30Factors Influencing Meat Consumption in the
Thohoyandou Sub-Region.
31(No Transcript)
32The supply chain
33Commercial hunter
Farmer hunter
Bush meat Market
Urban retailer
Urban Restaurant
Household/Consumer
34Conclusion
- There is some awareness about the food and
nutritional value of the meat of rabbits and cane
rats.
- There are currently no official policies to
promote their consumption/use or otherwise.
- The findings with respect to preference patterns
suggest that rabbit and cane rat meat are not
seriously discriminated against by consumers.
- This means that there are great opportunities to
develop the market for cane rats and rabbit meat
in South Africa.
- However, widespread acceptance of rabbit and cane
rat meat will be hampered by lack of knowledge
about their numerous production, income and
nutritional advantages.