Poverty and Social Impact Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Poverty and Social Impact Analysis

Description:

'Analysis of intended and unintended consequences of policy interventions ex ante, ... Anchoring PSIA institutionally in PRS process and enabling national stakeholders ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: DFID70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Poverty and Social Impact Analysis


1
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis
  • DFID SEMINAR SERIES
  • Spring 2003

2
Origins of PSIA
  • Adjustment with Human Face
  • Social Dimensions of Adjustment
  • ESAF independent review
  • PRGF Key Features
  • PRSC

3
What is PSIA?
  • Analysis of intended and unintended consequences
    of policy interventionsex ante, during their
    implementation, or ex poston the well-being of
    different social groups, with a special focus on
    the vulnerable and the poor. Well-being, or
    welfare, includes the income and non-income
    dimensions of poverty (JIC Concept Note April
    2001).

4
Why Do Pilots?
  • Demonstration effect
  • Embed in PRS process (national ownership of
    analysis)
  • Ensure multi disciplinarity
  • Be pragmatic (what is possible using existing
    data knowledge)
  • Be flexible and policy-oriented (respond in real
    time)
  • Enhance our capacity to influence IFIs

5
Operationalising PSIA pilots
  • Demand-led
  • government interest in poverty and social impact
    analysis of specific policies or programmes
  • timely relative to PRSP process and PRGF, PRSC,
    SAL negotiations
  • country programme advisors prepared to follow-up
    in medium term (capacity building)
  • Counties Rwanda, Uganda, Mozambique, Armenia,
    Honduras, Indonesia, Orissa State (Pakistan)
  • International and national researchers (40 days
    each social economic analysts)

6
DFID/HMT strategy
  • Call for improvements in Fund/Bank policy and
    practice
  • PSIA in PRGF/CAS/PRSC
  • More upstream Bank/Fund co-ordination
  • Greater transparency Bank website, civil
    society engagement in PSIA and its results
  • Engagement at Board level
  • IMFC call for systematic approach
  • Reports at Annual meetings
  • IDA13 language
  • ChX and SoS engagement
  • Joint Technical level work
  • October workshop WB/DFID/IMF
  • Secondments to PREM

7
What Did We Learn?
  • PSIA can in a short time and using existing
    knowledge - identify certain kinds of impact of
    specific policies on the poor, and add important
    missing ingredients to a policy debate
  • PSIA can identify livelihood groups that will be
    adversely affected and risks of increased
    vulnerability of individuals and groups
  • PSIA can inform design complementary policies
    needed to minimise anti-poor impacts
  • But, it is easier to analyse impact of a specific
    policy (within a macro framework that is
    delivering stability and growth) than it is to
    analyse the whole of the macro framework (Rwanda
    PSIA)
  • And, PSIAs of specific reforms will not be able
    to cover all possible policy-relevant analysis
    for that reform (Mozambique)

8
Methods
  • Good practice involves combining data from
    economic and social analysis
  • Social analysis can generate hypotheses tested
    through econometric techniques, and information
    about particular groups. Economic analysis
    generates data on key variables (price effects
    impact on HH consumption)
  • Research design should specify at outset how
    economic, social analyses will be sequenced and
    combined.
  • Requires sufficient planning time upstream and
    skills in managing communicating across
    disciplinary boundaries
  • There is untapped potential in information
    presently available in country
  • Short, focused fieldwork can pay big dividends
  • HH survey data not always useful to identify
    livelihood groups (income sources not always
    specified use of broad-brush categories such as
    urban/rural)

9
Process
  • Too early to see evidence of policy impact, but
    early indications promising (Uganda Armenia)
  • Anchoring PSIA institutionally in PRS process and
    enabling national stakeholders (governments) to
    take the lead are likely to be critical factors
    in maximising potential of PSIA to
  • Inform policy design and implementation
  • Inform national debates and build constituencies
    for reform
  • Bilaterals have a role to play in supporting PSIA
    where independent analysis is seen as important
  • Ideally, a PSIA programme is planned upstream
    through broad stakeholder engagement on choice of
    policies and how research will proceed (Ghana)
  • But expectations need to be managed and
    possibilities for conflict recognised
  • Strong interest in/demand for PSIA capacity
    building
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com