Title: EU Kids Online Comparative Analysis of European Press Coverage of Children and the Internet
1(No Transcript)
2EU Kids Online Comparative Analysis of European
Press Coverage of Children and the Internet
- Leslie Haddon
- London School of Economics and Political Sciences
- COST298 workshop East meets West Dialogue
between Broadband Societies, 27th October, 2009,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
3Media analysis goal
- In Media Studies, there is some comparison of
media systems, less of specific media coverage - To what extent are there shared media logics
producing similar types of news across (European)
countries and to what extent is there variation?
4Internet goal
- To what extent is there similar or different
reporting of children and the internet in terms
of amount of reporting, but also the types of
coverage (e.g. positive/negative
opportunities/risks)? - To what extent are different risks reported in
different countries?
5Method
- 14 country study Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Ireland,
Italy, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and the
UK - Focus on the press
- Quantitative content analysis
6Method and framework
- 2 months of data collected (October-November
2007) - Cultivation analysis focus on routine media
coverage
7Amount of coverage
- For most countries there was similar rate of
coverage per newspaper, an average of 20 articles
per month, per paper - Implies similar media logics/quotas/newsworthiness
8Amount of coverage
- Some with lower coverage (Bulgaria, Greece,
Portugal and Denmark with 8-9 articles). - Two countries with above average coverage - Italy
(30 articles) and especially Spain (40 articles)
9Amount of coverage
- Mixed picture
- Some similarities, some differences
- At best partially accounted for by internet
diffusion, but not entirely
10Type of coverage
- A few countries where the cumulative coverage was
actually positive - Some where it was balanced or mixed
- Many countries where coverage was primarily
negative, and this was quite extreme in some
cases.
11Type of coverage Detailed
- Nearly two-thirds of all stories (64) referred
to risks - Nearer a fifth (18) referred to opportunities.
12Types of story
- Generally there was a high degree of reporting
across most countries of crime, court cases and
police actions. - When examining the coded data for the areas of
life related to the story, this is the category
that dominated in all but one country
13Types of story
- This correlates with origins of stories and whose
voices are heard in the press - The exception was Denmark
- - Less crime? Less reported crime? Less police
actions? - - Or less media space routinely devoted to this
category?
14Other media processes Foreign news
- In some countries there was a minority of
national stories two-thirds of stories in
Slovenia were about foreign events and over half
were so in Austria and Portugal. - BUT foreign stories were more often negative
- 8 of foreign news was positive compared to 27
of national news.
15The role of particular stories
- Interpol search for paedophile who put child sex
abuse pictures on the internet the search,
clues, the arrest - Finnish case of a school student who shot people
at school after broadcasting his attentions of
YouTube copy cat attempts in other countries
16The role of particular stories
- The coverage varied a lot by country
- Sometimes this was because it was a neighbouring
country, but not always - These two events influenced the overall
statistics the presence of crime stories would
be less exaggerated without them
17The robustness of the figures
- Q Would the figures be different if we had a
time period when there were no such stories? - Or would these simply be replaced by other
stories, so that overall the level of crime
stories remained the same?
18The variation in risk reported
- That in many countries content risks count for
over half of all risks cited in the press in
Greece and Spain, then Portugal, Belgium,
Ireland, Estonia, the UK. - In contrast, the reporting of conduct risks is
noticeably higher in Norway, Austria (then Italy
and Germany). - Only in Denmark and to an extent Slovenia do
contact risks form a substantial minority of all
risks discussed in the press.
19The variation in risk reported
- Do media values and reporting reflect wider
social values? - But like overall coverage, the pattern of which
risks were reported were exaggerated by the two
international stories - Even so, do the differences influence perceptions
of risk in different countries?
20Summary Cross-National Media Reporting
- There is some degree of commonality across the
European countries in terms of amount of coverage
of children and the internet, and the degree to
which it was negative - But, there were exceptions, e.g. foreign news
reporting
21Summary Cross-National Media Reporting
- This raises the question of whether there are
certain shared media logics, quotas and criteria
of newsworthiness. - The exceptions may in part reflect slightly
different media values at work
22Summary Cross-National Media Reporting
- The mechanism that produces negative/risk news
appears to be the routines coverage of crime,
etc. - More coverage of foreign news exaggerates this
- Particular stories can affect the figures
23Summary Cross-National Media Reporting
- Although affected by particular stories, which
risks are covered more can vary be country - This may reflect values/dominant frameworks in
those countries - It may also sensitise readers to different risks
(cultivation theory)
24Media Report
- Haddon, L., and Stald, G. (2009). A
cross-national European analysis of press
coverage of children and the internet, a report
from EU Kids Online. LSE, London EU Kids Online.
Available at http//www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EUKi
dsOnline/Reports/MediaReport.pdf
25Articles and chapters
- Haddon, L. and Stald, G. (2009) A Comparative
Analysis of European Press Coverage of Children
and the Internet, Journal of Children and Media,
volume 3 issue 4, Fall. - Ponte,C. Bauwens, J. and Mascheroni, G. (2009)
Children and the Intenret in the News Agencies,
Voices and Agendas, in Livingstone, S. and
Haddon, L. (eds) Kids Online Opportunities and
Risks for Children, Policy Press, Bristol
26Articles and chapters
- Mascheroni, G., Ponte, C., Garmendia, M.,
Garitaonandia, C., Marru, M. F. (forthcoming),
Comparing Online Risks for Children in South
Western European Countries Italy, Portugal and
Spain, International Journal of Media and
Cultural Politics.