Noncrossing geometric path covering red and blue points in the plane - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Noncrossing geometric path covering red and blue points in the plane

Description:

the number of red points might not be equal to the number of blue points. =2.3 1.2=10 ... Xi contains exactly a red points and b blue. points. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: kano
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Noncrossing geometric path covering red and blue points in the plane


1
Non-crossing geometric path covering red and
blue points in the plane
  • Mikio Kano
  • Ibaraki University
  • Japan
  • October 2002

2
Ra set of red points in the plane Ba set
of blue points in the plane We always
assume that no three points in R U B lie on the
same line.
3
Theorem If RB, then there exists a perfect
non-crossing geometric alternating matching that
covers R U B.
4
Proof of the previous theorem by using
Ham-sandwich and by induction

f(n)2f(n/2)O(n) f(n)O(n log n)
5
Problem For given RUB, can it be covered by
geometric alternating paths Pn of order n
without crossing ?

8
Path P4Pn
6
When we consider paths of odd order, the number
of red points might not be equal to the number of
blue points.
2.31.210
Path P3Pn
1.32.27
7
Theorem (Kaneko, MK, Suzuki)
  • If RBkm and 2m can be covered by path P2m without crossings.
  • If Rk(m1)hm, Bkmh(m1) and 2m1
    crossings.
  • 2,3, ,11,12,14 are OK. 13,15,16, NO

8
Sketch of Proof (I)
  • We show that there exist a balanced convex
    subdivision of the plane such that each convex
    polygon contains either 2m redblue points or
    2m1 redblue points.
  • If 2mof 2m redblue points or 2m1 redblue points has
    P2m or P2m1 covering without crossings.
  • In other case, there exists a configuration
    having no Pn coverings.

9
Sketch of Proof II
Step 1 Convex balanced subdivision of the
plane Step 2 For each subdivision, there exists
a non-crossing path
P6 RB18
10
P5
R342216, B243214
11
We show some configurations which have no path
covering.
2m113
12
2m14
13
2m115
14
2m116
15
2m117
16
2m118
17
Balanced convex subdivision of the plane
2m6
18
  • Theorem (Bespamyatnikh, Kirkpatrick,Snoeyink,
  • Sakai and Ito, Uehara,Yokoyama)
  • If Rag and Bbg, then there exists a
  • subdivision X1 U X2 U U Xg of the plane
  • into g disjoint convex polygons such that every
  • Xi contains exactly a red points and b blue
  • points.

19
An equitable subdivision of 2g red points and 4g
blue points.
Not convex
n(4/3) (log n)3 log g time algorithm
20
  • Applying the above theorem with abm
  • to our RUB, we can obtain the desired
  • convex subdivision of the plane.
  • Namely, if RBkm, then there exists
  • a subdivision X1U UXk of the plane
  • into k disjoint convex polygons such that
  • every Xi contains exactly m red points and
  • m blue points.

21
  • Theorem (Kaneko, MK and K.Suzuki)
  • If R(m1)kmh and Bmk(m1)h, then
  • there exists a subdivision
  • X1 U U Xk U Y1 U U Yh
  • of the plane into kh disjoint convex polygons
  • such that every Xi contains m1 red points
    and m blue points, and every Yj contains m red
    points and m1 blue points.

22
m2 and m13
23
  • We can prove the above theorem in the same way as
    the proof by Bespamyatnikh, Kirkpatrick,
    Snoeyink.
  • However we generalize the key lemma as follows.
    The proof is the same as the proof given by the
    above people.

24
Three cutting Theorem Let Rg1g2g3 and
Rh1h2h3. Suppose that for every line l with
left(l) Rgi, it follows that left(l)
B such that
g2 red points and h2 blue points
r1
r2
g1 red points and h1 blue points
g3 red points and h3 blue points
r3
25
Conditions of 3-cutting Theorem
g3 red points less than h3 blue points
g2 red points
less than h2 blue points
g1 red points
less than h1 blue points
26
A balanced convex subdivision
h2 blue points
g2 red points
Not convex
h1 blue points
g3 red points
g1 red points
h3 blue points
A vertical line
27
Remark on the above theorem
  • Let a and b be integers s.t. 1
  • Then there exist configurations of Rakbh red
    points Bbkah blue points for which there
    exist no convex balanced subdivisions of the
    plane.
  • Thus the above theorem cannot be generalized.

28
a2, b4
Each polygon contains either 2 red points and 4
blue points, or 4 red points and 2 blue points.
29
We finally show that if either RB and R U
BB can be covered by Pn.
R U B4
P4
30
R U B5
P5
31
R U B6
P6
32
x
Lemma RUB5. If RUB is a configuration given
in the figure, there exists a path P5 which
covers RUB and starts with x.
Bad case
R U B9
A new line satisfies good condition.
33
x
Lemma RUB6. If a red point x can see a blue
convex point y, then there exists a path P6
which covers RUB and starts with x.
y
We can show that we may assume that there exits a
line in the figure.
R U B11
34
Conjecture (A.K, M.K)
  • Let gg1g2 gk such that each gi
  • If Rag and Bbg, then there exists a
  • subdivision X1 U X2 U U Xk of the plane
  • into k disjoint convex polygons such that each
  • Xi contains exactly agi red points and bgi blue
  • points.

agi red points
bgi blue points
Xi
35
Find a nice problem from the following figure,
and solve it
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com