Developing International Business Leaders for the New Millennium - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Developing International Business Leaders for the New Millennium

Description:

Judges the ultimate success of the project ... White space. Use bold, but do not overuse bold ... Number the pages. Don't have spelling/grammar errors. Check ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: ValuedGate594
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Developing International Business Leaders for the New Millennium


1
Developing International Business Leaders for the
New Millennium
  • Pre-Conference Workshop
  • September 24, 2003

2
Presented by Beth Seaton
  • Director of Sponsored Projects
  • Western Illinois University
  • b-seaton_at_wiu.edu
  • 309-298-1191

3
Creating and Sustaining an International Alliance
  • Developing Competitive Grant Proposals to Secure
    Funding for Your International Collaborative
    Projects

4
Parts of a Proposal
  • Abstract
  • Introduction/Background
  • Need/Problem
  • Goals and Objectives
  • Methodology
  • Evaluation
  • Dissemination
  • Future Funding
  • Budget
  • Appendices

5
Abstract
  • The first section but should be written last
  • Provides complete overview of your project
    including needs, objectives, and methods
  • Should be written for public distribution
  • Usually 250-500 words

6
Introduction/Background
  • Describes your institution
  • Describes your organizational goals
  • Establishes credibility
  • Leads logically to the problem statement
  • Gives your track record or borrows through
    liaison with others--consultants or letters of
    endorsement

7
Need/Problem
  • The problem, and its significance, are clearly
    conveyed
  • Includes citations for appropriate sources
  • Provides rationale for your goals and
    objectives
  • Responsive to the funding agencys area of
    interest

8
Problem/Need (2)
  • Foreshadows your methodology and solutions
  • Focuses on the uniqueness of approach
  • Describes the need in human terms

9
Goals and Objectives
  • Goals represent long- range benefits
  • Often included in the guidelines
  • Goals are broad, describing an improvement of a
    generalizable situation
  • Objectives are specific and measurable
  • Objectives help you achieve your goals
  • Activities or tasks are the steps you must take
    to achieve your objectives

10
Objectives
  • Should not be buried in text
  • Concise and clear
  • Measurable
  • Flow from the problem statement
  • Demonstrate an outcome that is important to the
    funding agency

11
Sample Objectives
  • To increase the number of Hispanic females who
    complete an undergraduate degree at WIU by 10
    within the next 5 years
  • Reduce the number of incidents of violence
    against women on campus
  • Participants will be able to identify six new
    approaches to classroom management in grades K-2

12
Most Common Errors When Writing Objectives
  • Confusing the objectives with the methods
    (activities or tasks)
  • Confusing the objectives with the overall goals
  • Using the terms goals, objectives, or
    activities inconsistently and/or
    inappropriately
  • Written in passive voice

13
Methodology
  • Describes your project activities in detail
  • Describes how your objectives will be achieved
  • Includes information on why you will use this
    approach
  • Activities and Tasks are the same thing so
    stick with one or the other--dont use both
    terms in one proposal
  • Methods are also termed Procedures

14
Methodology (2)
  • Use of Timelines and Task Charts
  • Serves as a good visual
  • Shows you have every step laid out
  • Lists activities/tasks for each objective
  • Includes who, what, when/how long
  • Helpful in budget preparation

15
Evaluation
  • Tells the funding agency how you will determine
    if the project has been successful
  • Is a section often overlooked by those writing
    the proposal, but not by those reviewing it
  • Should include both formative and summative
    components

16
Evaluation (2)
  • Formative
  • Provides feedback during the project
  • Allows for project alteration (methodological)
  • Learn as you go approach
  • Summative
  • Judges the ultimate success of the project
  • Documents the extent to which objectives were
    achieved

17
Evaluation (3)What You Can Do to Make this
Section Easier to Write
  • Keep the evaluation in mind when writing the
    methodology section
  • If your objectives are measurable, the
    evaluation section will flow naturally
  • Use an outside evaluator, if appropriate, and
    get input from that person

18
Evaluation (4)What You Can Do to Make this
Section Easier to Write
  • Consider repeating each objective and then write
    the evaluative measure
  • Consider using examples of tables to show what
    your results may look like
  • Consider citing examples of survey instruments
    or forms

19
Dissemination
  • Tells how you will let others know about
    your project
  • Gives specific journals/meetings
  • Different for different audiences
  • Is reflected in the budget
  • Includes an evaluation component if possible

20
Budget DevelopmentIdentifying Budget Items
  • Refer to your goals, objectives and activities
    to think about what kinds of resources you will
    need
  • Dont get hung up on the actual
  • Budget items flow naturally from a
    well- developed methodology section

21
Budget Development (2)Direct costs
  • Direct costs are those specifically assigned to
    this particular project.
  • Salaries
  • Fringe benefits
  • Equipment
  • Travel
  • Supplies
  • Contractual
  • Other Costs

22
Budget Development (3)Salaries and Wages
  • Institutional polices on salary recovery
  • Summer salary
  • Graduate student stipends
  • Technical support
  • Clerical Support (sometimes no direct)
  • Undergraduate students

23
Budget Development (4)Fringe Benefits
  • Retirement
  • Medicare
  • FICA
  • Health, Life and Dental

24
Budget Development (5)Other Direct Costs
  • Check institutional equipment capitalization
    levels
  • Use approved travel regulations
  • Use subcontracts if money is going to other
    partners
  • Do not include general clerical support
    or office supplies (indirect/FA costs)

25
Budget Development (6)Facilities and
Administrative Costs
  • Not specific to this project
  • Overhead, indirect, etc.
  • Use the institutionally approved rate OR
  • Use the agency rate if one is stated
  • Includes library, payroll, space, heat,
    light physical plant, central administration, co
    mputer usage, etc.

26
Budget Development (7)Cost Sharing
  • Institution or partners share costs with
    the sponsoring agency
  • Check proposal guidelines
  • Difference between cash and in-kind
  • Non-required match often strengthens a proposal

27
Budget Development (8)Additional Considerations
  • Follow the agency guidelines format
  • Allow for annual increases in salaries and
    fringes
  • Reviewers should find no surprising items in the
    budget
  • Break items down (number of trips, cost
    of airfare, nights of lodging, etc.)
  • Write a budget narrative to fully justify each
    line item

28
Appendices
  • Contain secondary or supplemental information
  • Are often overlooked by reviewers
  • Are sometimes prohibited
  • Are a good place to give additional
    information if you have a page limit for the
    narrative section

29
Appendices (2)What to include
  • Article reprints
  • Vitae (if not asked for elsewhere)
  • Certifications
  • Proof of not-for-profit status
  • Long charts, graphs or tables
  • University policies
  • Board members
  • Press releases
  • Letters of support
  • Financial reports
  • Organizational charts
  • Facilities descriptions

30
Writing and EditingGetting Started
  • Read funded proposals
  • Get a copy of the reviewers evaluation sheet and
    use it as an outline
  • Read the criteria for funding
  • Get your thoughts down and revise, revise,
    revise
  • Use committees for critique, not writing

31
Writing and Editing (2)Stylistic Approach
  • Make it clear, concise, and free of jargon
  • Do not write to impress
  • Do not mask the problems and solutions with
    flowery prose
  • Write as if the project will be funded
  • Leave out all weak wording

32
Writing and Editing (3)Stylistic Approach
  • Use short sentences
  • Use active voice rather than passive voice
  • Clear out unnecessary words
  • Do not make claims that are unsubstantiated
  • Be careful with acronyms--dont try to be cute
    or amusing
  • Dont sacrifice verbs for nouns

33
Writing and Editing (4)Format/Appearance
  • White space
  • Use bold, but do not overuse bold
  • Minimal binding (make it easy to copy and stay
    open on a table)
  • Use only simple graphs and charts
  • One inch margins
  • 12 pt font or larger

34
Writing and Editing (5)Format/Appearance
  • Be consistent with use of headings and
    subheadings
  • Use bullets, lists, and outlines when
    appropriate
  • Avoid fancy covers and colored paper
  • Do not fully justify the text
  • Avoid fancy fonts

35
Writing and Editing (6)
  • Use a Table of Contents
  • Number the pages
  • Dont have spelling/grammar errors
  • Check your budget (then check it again)
  • Dont make reference to something you have
    failed to include

36
Writing and Editing (7)Final Comments
  • Proofread and have someone else proofread
  • Consider using and editor
  • Get started early and get others involved for
    critique (were here to help)
  • The appearance of your proposal may give you the
    competitive edge you need to get your project
    funded!

37
The Review Process
  • Different for different types of sponsors
  • Knowing how the project will be reviewed is key
    to how you will present your project
  • Get input from the program officer or
    your office of sponsored projects regarding the
    review process

38
Types of Proposal Reviews
  • Foundation Board
  • Site Visit
  • Program Staff
  • Agency Staff
  • Field Readers
  • Panel Review
  • Peer Review
  • Two-Tier review

39
Selection Criteria
  • Is it responsive to the guidelines?
  • Is there a need? If so, will the need be met?
  • Are the facilities available to carry this out?
  • What is the significance of the project?
  • Is it unique?
  • Can the project director carry it out?
  • Is there an efficient use of time and resources?

40
REJECTION!!!
  • Do not give up--proposal writing is a process,
    not a one-time event
  • Get the reviewers comments
  • Do not dispute the decision without a VERY GOOD
    reason
  • Revise and resubmit
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com