Safeguarding people using services: who should be barred from providing care - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Safeguarding people using services: who should be barred from providing care

Description:

Increasing policy focus on safeguarding/protecting adults, particularly since the late 1990s ... claims mitigating circumstances that one of them nipped him, Harm ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: martins73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Safeguarding people using services: who should be barred from providing care


1
Safeguarding people using services who should be
barred from providing care?
  • Martin Stevens, Jill Manthorpe, Shereen Hussein,
    Stephen Martineau, Joan Rapaport, Jess Harris
  • Social Care Workforce Research Unit

2
Introduction
  • Background
  • The POVA List
  • The research
  • Synthesising unsuitability
  • Implications for vulnerability and risk and
    social work practice

3
Background
  • Increasing policy focus on safeguarding/protecting
    adults, particularly since the late 1990s
  • No Secrets (2000) first dedicated Government
    policy
  • Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) List
    introduced in England in Care Standards Act
    (2000), implemented 2004
  • Independent Safeguarding Authority introduced by
    the Safeguarding Vulnerable groups Act (2006)
  • Risk as a backdrop (McLoughlin, 2007)
  • Tension between safeguarding and personalisation

4
The Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) List
  • It creates a list of people, held by the
    Secretary of State, who are considered unsuitable
    to work with vulnerable adults in England and
    Wales (DH Guidance, 2006)
  • Mandatory to refer workers dismissed after having
    harmed or placed at risk of harm
  • Mandatory to check if new employees have been
    barred (illegal to employ)
  • Illegal to seek work with Vulnerable Adults
    when barred

5
But, weve got a lot of lists
  • POCA (children) list
  • List 99 (teachers)
  • POVA (adult social care) list

Independent Safeguarding Authority 2009
6
POVA Research
  • Purpose To inform developments in the operation
    of the POVA List
  • What are the commonalities differences in a
    sample of referrals to the POVA list?
  • What factors are associated with decisions to put
    staff onto the POVA list?
  • How are decisions made about whether to put staff
    on the list?

7
Synthesising unsuitable people
Referral
Initial reaction
Unsuitable
Not unsuitable
8
Emotional reaction and moral judgement
  • I just get the feel from the nature of the abuse
    and the sort of other incidents that he is
    somebody who doesnt care.
  • My view of it is that there are one or two traits
    here that I personally dont like the sound of,
    and therefore I would not employ him and I
    wouldnt advise anyone else to employ him but
    thats a personal judgement and we are all down
    to personal judgements in these things

9
Mitigation for the person
Remorse
Admission of guilt
Previous good record
The person
Reaction
Intentions
Age of worker
Ongoing stress/ mental health
10
Mitigation of misconduct
Reaction to behaviour of service user
11
Factors supporting unsuitable verdict
  • Types of misconduct
  • It is very important, the worse ones like
    physical and sexual, I mean I just think you
    cant afford to... if you have any sort of
    evidence there... I just dont think you can
    afford to let that go.
  • Types of harm
  • I am thinking of one particular case where users
    didnt want any more assistance and this lady
    couldnt manage by herself but her trust had been
    shattered by what had happened. So there are
    issues beyond the financial.
  • Patterns of misconduct
  • If we have got an individual with an odd spike
    here and there then we need to start looking to
    see if there is a pattern emerging here.

12
Building a picture
Harm although he if you are an old lady being put
to bed and someone throws water at you and shouts
at you then I think that is emotional harm caused
there and I think physical
Person ...claims mitigating circumstances that
one of them nipped him,
Misconduct the fact that he Rob has shouted
and thrown water at a resident when helping them
to bed
Unsuitable
Not unsuitable
13
Conclusion
  • Unsuitability created as a relatively fixed
    trait, solidifying judgements of risk and
    vulnerability
  • Ethical and evidence based decisions, which can
    be improved by a sound knowledge of
  • service user and practice perspectives
  • Policy and conceptual developments in social care
  • Social workers involved in advising people using
    direct payments/individual budgets
  • Good decision making promoting confidence
  • Individual/collective focus

14
Contact details
  • Martin Stevens
  • e-mail martin.stevens_at_kcl.ac.uk tel 020 7848
    1860
  • Jill Manthorpe
  • e-mail jill.manthorpe_at_kcl.ac.uk tel 020 7848
    1683
  • Shereen Hussein
  • e-mail shereen.hussein_at_kcl.ac.uk tel 020 7848
    1669
  • Joan Rapaport
  • e-mail Joan.Rapaport_at_kcl.ac.uk tel 020 7848 1769
  • Stephen Martineau
  • e-mail Stephen.martineau_at_kcl.ac.uk tel 0207848
    1694
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com