Defining Quality Standards for Online Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Defining Quality Standards for Online Education

Description:

Non-ambiguous use of language. Appropriately designed learning activities. Software. No 'experimental' software (beta releases, shareware) No non-supported software ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: lawrenc106
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Defining Quality Standards for Online Education


1
Defining Quality Standards for Online Education
  • CADE, Calgary
  • May 2002

Lawrence C. Ragan Penn States World Campus
2
Program Goals
  • Discuss quality variables and their impact on the
    design and development of online course
    instruction
  • Review set of quality standards developed to
    guide the design, development and delivery of
    instruction online

3
Assignment 1
  • Turn to Defining Quality and complete definition
  • Compare answer with partner at table
  • What was common in both definitions?

4
Defining Quality
  • Writing by committeeAn event or experience
    that provides a reasonable opportunity for
    success for the student and instructor

5
Defining Quality
  • Varied interpretations of quality
  • Several industry-wide guidelines or standards for
    production of course materials (CHEA, AAHE,
    others)
  • Broad statements of principles and guidelines

6
Bottom Line
  • The definition of quality varies from institution
    to institution and is dependent upon the mission
    and model of the online initiative.

7
Assignment 2 Quality Characteristics
  • To define quality we need to define variables
  • Turn to 2. Complete Quality Characteristics
    variable labels
  • Compare answer with partner at table
  • What variables were common in both lists?

8
Quality Characteristics
  • Dependability
  • Reliability
  • Performance (speed)
  • Value
  • Consistent
  • Measurable
  • Etc

9
Quality Characteristics-NOT
  • Technology
  • Cost
  • Aesthetic
  • Gee whiz factor

10
Quality Standards-2 Options
  • Develop standards that can be used to judge the
    readiness of a course/educational event for an
    online delivery format
  • Develop standards of design that can serve as a
    specifications guide
  • Difficult to do both in single document

11
Considering Implementation
  • Development of plans for implementation
  • Institutionalizing standards
  • Developing failure to comply strategies

12
(No Transcript)
13
WC Online Design Standards
  • Struggle between specifications document and
    quality filter
  • Had to decide on objective of the publication
  • Opted for quality filter

14
Quality Filter Described
  • Create an instrument that would serve as a
    readiness assessment tool for courses NOT
    designed or developed BUT to be delivered via the
    World Campus.
  • Is not created as a design specification document

15
WC ODS Categories
  • COURSE PROFILE TOOL method of gathering
    demographic information regarding the nature of
    the course
  • Asynchronous vs synchronous
  • Nature of assignments
  • Timing and duration
  • Individual vs cohort
  • Etc

16
WC ODS Categories
  • Review COURSE PROFILE TOOL
  • What questions would you add to make this work at
    your institution?
  • What platform for delivery? (browser)
  • Learner and setting analysis - target audience,
    student profile
  • Special (19) may not be specific enough - define
    general applications
  • Mission or objectives of course should be
    outlined
  • Computer literacy prerequisites
  • Availability of faculty
  • Practical applications - lab requirements
  • Nature and timing of exams
  • Group under location requirements
  • Communication to student about how to start
  • Total instructional time to manage the course

17
Online Design Standards
  • User Interface
  • issues of structure, navigation, and layout
  • Media Elements
  • issues related to the use of technology
  • Software issues related to the use of software
    and the implications of its use in the course
  • Permissions/Legal issues relating to the
    legality of course and related content
  • Accessibility issues related to the
    accessibility of the course to all students

18
User Interface
  • Graphics/text only version
  • Use of thumbnails
  • Function tools should be big and obvious
  • Restrict or eliminate pop-ups and advertising
  • Culturally appropriate design and graphic content
  • Links to each page without having to go back to
    homepage

19
Media Elements
  • Appropriate use of media
  • Variety of media mix
  • Considerate of student bandwidth
  • Designed to support learning objectives
  • Considerate of development costs

20
Media Elements
  • General area that addresses software and hardware
    issues
  • General area that addresses software and hardware
    issues
  • Very PC-based, should be Mac or PC
  • Firewalls and proxy servers
  • Download requirements

21
Instructional Design
  • Clear learning objectives
  • Clear connection between learning objectives and
    assessment process
  • Clearly articulated assessment criteria and
    process
  • Non-ambiguous use of language
  • Appropriately designed learning activities

22
Software
  • No experimental software (beta releases,
    shareware)
  • No non-supported software
  • Reasonable costs
  • Available for international purchase
  • Etc

23
Permissions/Legal
  • World clearance of permissions
  • Intellectual property issues
  • Cleared for delivery online
  • Time cleared- for duration of the program and
    repeated offerings

24
Accessibility
  • Cultural/gender factors and filters
  • Adapting to culture rather than just translating
  • Sensitivity issues could be provided to
    writer/designer at the start of the process

25
Summary
  • Quality standards need to be defined in the
    context of the institution
  • Quality characteristics need to be articulated
    (vary based on context)
  • Need to define purpose of quality standards
    readiness or specifications
  • Define implementation plan

26
Thank you
  • Larry Ragan
  • LCR1_at_PSU.EDU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com