NIU Center for Child Welfare and Education CCWE Data Sets Generating Information About Educational P - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

NIU Center for Child Welfare and Education CCWE Data Sets Generating Information About Educational P

Description:

... in special education than those in non traditional foster care and home of relative placements. ... academic performance, attendance, bus discipline, and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: coe264
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NIU Center for Child Welfare and Education CCWE Data Sets Generating Information About Educational P


1
NIU Center for Child Welfare and Education
(CCWE)Data Sets Generating Information About
Educational Performance of DCFS Wards in
Residential/GroupHome Facilities, ILO and
TLPsData SummitChicago, ILMarch 16, 2007
2
Data Sets Maintained
  • Data set maintained Length of time
    How far back data maintained
    does data go?
  • CCWE database 3 years 2004-2005
  • Individual Student Intervention
  • Trainings
  • 8th/9th CPS data 2 years
    2005-2006
  • Well Being Study data Discrete-year by year
    2001-2002
  • Well Being Study data was collected in
    conjunction with a Child and Family Research
    Center of the University of Illinois,
    Champaign-Urbana, and therefore data sharing
    agreements exist.

3
Data Systems Used to Collect Data
  • CCWE database SQL Server
  • 8th/9th CPS data Excel/DCFS Server
  • Well Being Study Data SPSS
  • Caveat The CCWE at the request of DCFS personnel
    also collects data to examine educational
    concerns at residential facilities. This has
    involved residential students who attend both
    on-ground schools and public/private schools. To
    date, two such studies have been conducted as
    well as a survey of educational programs offered
    by residential facilities.

4
Availability of Data for DCFS and POS Agencies
  • CCWE database populates DCFS Education Passport
    for individual children and youth
  • Monthly data exchanges between NIU-ITS and DCFS
  • Monthly and quarterly reports are submitted to
    DCFS
  • 8th/9th CPS data shared with DCFS and POS
    agencies on a semester basis for youngsters
    having academic difficulties
  • Well being data shared with DCFS on an annual
    basis for DCFS reporting purposes
  • Training data shared with DCFS on a quarterly
    basis for
  • monitoring and DCFS federal reporting

5
Further data availability considerations
  • Further availability of well being data may be
    arranged
  • The IRB(s) would need to be amended to give POS
    agencies access only to the data for children
    they are contracted to case manage
  • It is assumed that because DCFS has guardianship
    of the children, the agency has automatic access
    to the well being data, though data exchange
    arrangements would need to be determined
  • The 8th/9th grade data involve school reports
    to DCFS and private agency staff for
    individual educational intervention purposes

6
Further data availability (continued)
  • The CCWE database is live so
  • DCFS could have a live link to all fields
  • POS agencies could have access to data on the
    children they case manage
  • These would require significant modification of
    the CCWE database with additional costs
    associated with database enhancement and
    increased (by thousands) number of users
  • Caveat The data provided via live link is
    already available to DCFS and POS in the
    Educational Passport, since DCFS imports
    information on educational interventions by
    Education Advisors received monthly from CCWE

7
Limitation in Publication of Data
  • Limitations on publication of the data exist
    only to the extent of protecting individual
    child-specific identification or information

8
Limitations to Data Sets
  • Well-Being Data The random sample selection
    procedures in each of the three years (2001-2002,
    2003-2004, 2004-2005) were done differently,
    therefore the sample weightings were different in
    each of the first two rounds which limit the
    degrees of freedom when conducting year to year
    comparisons
  • Caveat For the next three rounds, simple random
    samples will be drawn by DCFS

9
Limitations to Data Sets (continued)
  • CCWE Database This database only contains
    information on children and youth for whom
    Education Advisors intervened based on a
    referral, thus limiting generalization to the
    DCFS population as a whole
  • Caveat The Unusual Incident Reports, and the
    Administrative Case Review feedback reported in
    the CCWE database does represent the population
    as a whole in that the subset in the database
    represent the portion of the children with
    educational issues as derived from these two
    reporting procedures

10
Data Set Reliability
  • CCWE Database Reliability concerns are minimal
  • 8th/9th Grade CPS questions the reliability of
    some of their own data and the data in this set
    is derived from CPS
  • Well-Being Missing data in school file

11
Measures Repeated
  • Well-Being Data Measures are repeated each year
    new data is collected

12
Comprehensive Data Sets
  • Well-Being Data Very comprehensive as it gathers
    information across seven variables contributing
    to school success (overage in grade, academic
    program, academic performance, mobility,
    attendance, discipline, health issues)

13
Most Significant Information
  • Academic performance
  • School attendance
  • Suspension/expulsion
  • Other discipline issues
  • Trends by state location
  • Academic program
  • IEP eligibility
  • Overage in grade
  • School mobility
  • Personnel trained

Proven relationship to accomplishing high school
graduation
14
Trends
  • Youth in residential/group homes were seven times
    more likely to be in special education than those
    in non traditional foster care and home of
    relative placements.
  • Children and youth in specialized foster care
    homes were three times more likely to be in
    special education. Thus, youth in
    residential/group homes had a higher probability
    of being in special education than those in
    specialized foster homes.

15
Trends (continued)
  • These youth also have fewer credits earned in the
    freshman year than do youth in non traditional
    and relative foster care and in specialized
    foster care.
  • They have lower grade point averages (GPA).
  • They also have a higher rate of absenteeism.

16
Trends (continued)
  • The studies of individual residential facilities
    have shown problems with credits toward
    graduation, academic performance, attendance, bus
    discipline, and discipline procedures
    inconsistent with DCFS policy.
  • The survey showed problems with school
    enrollment, surrogate parent assignment,
    attendance, academic achievement, discipline,
    credits toward graduation, and coordination with
    public schools.

17
Data Utilization
  • The data should be used to directly intervene to
    provide better educational supports.
  • The training data could be utilized to determine
    who would benefit from specific types of training
    or additional training.
  • There should be a data exchange between
    Northwestern University and Northern Illinois
    University for the purpose of identifying
    children who are having educational problems, and
    who are or have experienced trauma to the end of
    developing more appropriate educational supports
    and services.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com