Finite Element Modeling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Finite Element Modeling

Description:

Chunky, low aspect ratio. Classic (or Design Simulation) in FEA package (or CAD) shell ... Normal and shear stresses perpendicular to plane of action assumed to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: jiml93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Finite Element Modeling


1
Finite Element Modeling
  • GE393
  • Computer Aided Design, Analysis and Prototyping

2
FEM Process Steps
  • Geometry
  • Create from scratch
  • Import from CAD
  • Select analysis approach
  • Mesh
  • Manual
  • Automatic
  • Assign material properties
  • Add boundary conditions
  • Supports
  • Loads

3
Model Geometry
4
Modeling Analysis Approaches
  • Planar simulations
  • Plane stress
  • Plane strain
  • Axisymmetric
  • 3D simulations
  • Beam
  • Symmetry (and anti-symmetry)
  • Shell (or plate, surface)
  • Solid

5
Plane Stress
  • Normal and shear stresses perpendicular to plane
    of action assumed to be zero
  • Look for extrusions
  • Depth small w/r/t cross section
  • Slices parallel to plane stress cross section
    have same stress distribution
  • Thickness input manually

6
Plane Strain
  • Normal and shear strains perpendicular to plane
    of action assumed to be zero
  • Similar to plane stress, except
  • Depth large w/r/t cross section
  • Loading applied in units of load per depth
  • Long pipe under pressure
  • Common in civil engineering
  • Retaining walls, dams

7
Axisymmetric
  • Revolved geometry and boundary conditions
  • Base feature a revolved solid
  • Some asymmetry may be acceptable bracket
    solutions
  • Planar model
  • Especially useful for nonlinear solutions
  • Constraints
  • Must be constant about parts axis
  • Only need constraints parallel to axis of
    revlution
  • No out-of-plane translation or rotation
  • Example - pressure vessels, tanks

8
Symmetry
  • Reflective
  • Cyclic
  • Anti-symmetry

9
Reflective Symmetry
  • Symmetry and BCs equal across one, two, three
    planes
  • Do not use for modal and dynamic analyses
  • Near symmetry analyze less rigid half
  • Total load divided by of symmetry planes
  • Except pressure or area dependent load
  • Constraints
  • On solid model, prevent translation through plane
    of symmetry
  • On beam and shell models, must also prevent
    rotation parallel to cut planes

10
Design Simulation Frictionless Support
11
Cyclic Symmetry
  • Radial features
  • Model as a single instance of radial feature
  • Isolate instance with cut planes
  • Loading must be radial
  • Fan turbine blades, flywheel, motor rotors
  • BCs
  • Each radial feature instance must see same bcs
  • Centrifugal forces, radial displacement due to
    press fit, uniform wind or fluid resistance due
    to spinning
  • Gravity load on vertical wheel invalidates cyclic
    symmetry

12
Beam Models
  • Use for beam-like structures
  • Long compared to cross-section
  • If wireframe representation conveys geometry
    without ambiguity, then beam model is probably
    appropriate

13
Shell (Plate) Modeling
  • Used for modeling thin-walled structures
  • Wall thickness small w/r/t size or surface area
  • Part recognizable when modeled with zero
    thickness surfaces
  • May be significantly more accurate than solid
    models in bending, with reasonable solution times
  • Can be used with symmetry
  • Can be mixed with other (e.g., beam, solid)
    elements
  • Achieving convergence is more straightforward
    than with solids
  • Mid-plane extraction

14
Solid Element Modeling
  • Most CPU intensive
  • Bulky, low aspect ratio parts
  • Potato shaped
  • Inherently less ambiguous, requires fewer
    assumptions

15
Contact Modeling
  • Complex, nonlinear technique
  • Allows two parts to touch, slide, bounce off
    and/or react against one another
  • Element types
  • Gap
  • Slide line
  • General contact

16
Assembly Modeling
  • Some assemblies (e.g., weldments) behave as a
    single continuous entity -gt do not require
    special modeling technique
  • Use Component contribution analysis

Question when an assembly is meshed in DS, do
the parts share common nodes across parts?
17
Component Contribution Analysis
  • Do not start with an assembly
  • Isolate each part for a separate initial analysis
  • Use boundary conditions to account for
    interaction between mating parts
  • Goal is to develop a simple model of the part,
    focusing on its particular analysis requirements
  • Disadvantage of CCA it takes longer
  • Must analyze each part individually before
    assembly analysis

18
Finite Element Modeling
  • GE393
  • Computer Aided Design, Analysis and Prototyping
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com