Title: The Relationship between Competition Policy, Regulation and Trade Policy in the Brazilian Economy
1Ministry of Finance - Brazil
Secretariat for Economic Monitoring
- The Relationship between Competition Policy,
Regulation and Trade Policy in the Brazilian
Economy
Claudio Considera May, 2002
2OECDs Recommendation Regarding Regulatory
Reform The Importance of an Effective
Competition Policy
- OECD has recently recommended its members to
adopt maket opening and competition enhancing
regulatory reform, with more effective
application of competition law. - OECD Report on Regulatory Reform (1997) mentions
3- Reform economic regulations in all sectors to
stimulate competition, and eliminate them except
where clear evidence demonstrates that they are
the best way to serve broad public interests - Review and strengthen where necessary the scope,
effectiveness and enforcement of competition
policy.
4The Division of Tasks between Competition
Agencies and Regulators
- The introduction of competition into regulated
sectors brings up for discussion the proper
relationship - who does what - between
economy-wide competition agencies and
sector-specific regulators. - In spite of institutional and historical
differences from country to country, OECDs
studies (The Relationship between Competion and
Regulatory Authorities, 1999) indicate that
5The Competition Agencies are Better Suited to be
in Charge of the Competition Protection Function
in Regulated Sectors
- Competition agencies have a comparative advantage
when it comes to antitrust analysis, ensuring
that anti-competitive conducts and merger review
process do not undo the benefits from introducing
greater competition into regulated sectors.
6- Competition agencies are better suited by their
accumulated expertise, experience and
institutional characteristics antitrust
analysis is their core function - The institutional cultural differences between
the competition agencies and the sector-specific
regulators tend to produce different approaches
regarding competition protection. Trying to
change or mix institutional cultures could
compromise abilities to perform core functions
7- Better allocation of resources antitrust
analysis does not differ very much from one
sector to the other. Creating antitrust units
inside the regulators requires the unnecessary
expenditure of (scarce) financial and human
resources - Integrity of the national competition policy and
legal certainty - Economy-wide competition agencies tend to be more
immune to capture than sector-specific
regulators.
8The Sector-specific Regulators are Better Suited
to be in Charge of the Technical and Economic
Regulation
- Sector-specific regulators have a comparative
advantage in taking care of both the technical
and the economic regulation - Both require on-going monitoring and the
application of sector-specific expertise.
9The Importance of Cooperation between
Competition-Agencies and Sector-specific
Regulators
- Due to the synergies that arise from the
regulatory and competition functions, competition
agencies and sector-specific regulators must
cooperate closely. - In order to avoid inconsistent and investment
discouraging application of the policies - In order to avoid resource duplication and to
ensure that technical regulators take proper
account of the ways in which the adoption of
technical standards can be used to restrict
competition
10The Relationship between Competition Authorities
and Regulators in Brazil Today
- The Secretariat for Economic Monitoring -Seae
(Ministry of Finance), the Secretariat for
Economic Law-SDE (Ministry of Justice) and the
Administrative Council for Economic Defence-Cade
(independent body linked to the Ministry of
Justice) are the brazilian antitrust authorities.
- SEAE and SDE have analytical and investigative
functions and prepare instruction reports to
CADE, which is an administrative tribunal.
CADEs decisions can only be reviewed by the
courts.
11The Relationship between Competition Authorities
and Regulators in Brazil Today
- There are no specific exemptions from the
competition law for any of the regulated sectors.
Law n. 8.884/94 applies fully to them and also to
privatizations - In most cases, the bodies in charge of the
instruction phase (Seae and SDE) work in
cooperation with the sector-specific regulators
involved (the regulatory agencies). - CADE(administrative competition tribunal) decides
all competition questions regarding the regulated
sectors.
12The Relationship between Competition Authorities
and Regulators in Brazil Today
- SPECIFIC SITUATIONS
- Telecommunications Seae and SDE are not in
charge of the instruction phase. Only ANATEL(the
sector-specific regulator) prepares a instruction
report to Cade - Pharmaceuticals and Health equipment, components,
primary goods and services ANVISA (the
sector-specific regulator) has na overlapping
function regarding the instruction phase of some
anti-competitive conducts cases
13The Relationship between Competition Authorities
and Regulators in Brazil Today
- Financial Sector Although there are no specific
exemptions regarding this sector in Law nº
8.884/94, this has always been a controversial
issue (Central Bank vs. Competition Authorities) - A draft-bill is being prepared to solve this
competence-conflict question, by which - Merger Cases The Central Bank will have the
final word regarding the merger review of cases
which involve systemic risk, while the
Competition Authorities will have the final word
regarding the cases that dont. - Anti-competitive Conducts the Competition
Authorities will have the final word concerning
the decision of anti-competitive conducts.
14The National Competition Agency (ANC)
- Nothing is supposed to change with the creation
of ANC the competition law will apply fully to
regulated sectors, the competition authority (now
only ANC) will be in charge of its enforcement
and will work in cooperation with the regulatory
agencies - Since ANC will include Seae, SDE and CADE, it
will be granted that the Competition Agency will
be in charge of both the instruction phase and
the decision of competition cases regarding all
regulated sectors.
15Thank You for Your Attention.
- Claudio Considera
- Secretary for Economic Monitoring
- Ministry of Finance - Brazil
- Telephone number 55-61 4122360
- Fax number 55-61 2250971
- E-mail consider_at_fazenda.gov.br