Pesticides and Sustainable Agriculture: An OECD Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Pesticides and Sustainable Agriculture: An OECD Perspective

Description:

(PSE billion, average 2004-06, for Brazil & China 2005) Norway 2.4 ... Nominal prices fall but stay above average levels of the past ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: ees46
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pesticides and Sustainable Agriculture: An OECD Perspective


1
Pesticides and Sustainable Agriculture An OECD
Perspective
Kevin Parris Trade and Agriculture Directorate,
OECD, Paris, France kevin.parris_at_oecd.org
www.oecd.org/tad/env/indicators
European Voice Conference, Brussels, Belgium 14
October 2008
2
Policies, Pesticides and the Environment
State of Environment
Policies
Driving Forces
  • Agricultural -- CAP Support for
    crops
  • Agri-environmental -- Support for organic
    farming
  • Environmental -- EU Water Framework
    Directive
  • Farm systems Conventional to Organic
  • Farm practices Integrated Pest Management
  • Farm input use Pesticides
  • Soils Soil biodiversity
  • Water Quality
  • Air Ozone, methyl bromide
  • Biodiversity Wild species in terrestrial and
    aquatic ecosystems

This framework excludes some issues, e.g. human
health, container disposal
2
3
Volume of active ingredients, Index 1990-92100
Trends in EU15 Pesticide Use 1990 to 2006
4
Recent Trends in EU15 Pesticides
  • Declining use (volume) by 6.5 between 1990-92 to
    2004-06 but growth in crop output mainly
    explained by
  • Interaction of higher crop productivity and lower
    crop subsidies
  • Adoption of improved pest management practices
  • Expansion of organic farming, partly due to
    support
  • Human health and environmental risks declining,
    but
  • Information is limited with no EU wide indicator
  • Widespread presence of pesticides in rivers,
    lakes, aquifers
  • Continuing harmful impacts on wildlife
  • Persistence of older (banned) pesticides (e.g.
    DDT, atrazine), but 75 reduction in methyl
    bromide use (ozone depleting substance)
  • Monetary costs of pesticide use remain high, e.g.
    in UK about 150 million annually for water
    companies (this excludes other human health
    costs and harm to biodiversity)

4
5
Producer Support Estimates (PSE)
PSE as a share of Gross Farm Receipts (PSE
billion, average 2004-06, for Brazil China 2005)
Norway 2.4
EU25 113
OECD 225
USA 31
China 28
Australia 1.0
Brazil 3.4
6
Medium Term Outlook (next 10 years)
  • Higher international agricultural commodity
    prices, including growth in biofuel production
    and organic sector
  • Impact of climate change on crop production and
    patterns
  • Improvements in crop husbandry, pest management
    and related technologies, especially
    biotechnologies
  • Increase in public pressure to improve
    information on the health and environmental
    impacts of using pesticides
  • Decline in overall EU and OECD agricultural
    support and change in how support is provided to
    farmers

6
7
International market price projections 2017
Nominal prices fall but stay above average levels
of the past
8
Future Challenges
  • Matching imbalance between benefits of pesticide
    use and support for farming, with social and
    environmental costs
  • Improving the uptake of Integrated Pest
    Management
  • Developing technologies that reduce health and
    environmental risks but that improve crop yields
  • Strengthening knowledge, science and monitoring
    to underpin better decision making
  • Enhancing public understanding of health,
    environmental, transgenic crops and pesticide
    use linkages
  • Recognising pesticides are also used by other
    sectors, e.g. in Belgium farming accounts for
    65-70 of pesticides

8
9
Policy Actions
  • Continue reforms of Common Agricultural Policy by
    lowering overall level and composition of support
  • Enhance coherence between EU farm and env.
    policies so that carrots provided if farmers
    comply with sticks
  • Ensure policy mix to balance pesticide cost and
    benefits regulatory, economic (taxes),
    information and voluntary
  • Support the collection and public dissemination
    of science and monitoring data related to
    pesticides
  • Undertake cost-benefit analysis of pesticide use
    in agriculture and its health and environmental
    impacts

9
10
Thank you for listening
Views expressed in this presentation are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those
of the OECD or its member countries
10
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com