Ecclesiastes Qoheleth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Ecclesiastes Qoheleth

Description:

[ Fox] Text: Masoretic Text ' ... Qoheleth's Teaching: Fox 'This is not an encouraging theology, nor is it meant to be. ... Qoheleth's Teaching: Fox ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:262
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: hebrewscri
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ecclesiastes Qoheleth


1
Ecclesiastes - Qoheleth
  • APTS-BIB508-2006

2
Name
  • "The Hebrew title of the book is Qoheleth, the
    supposed name or title of its author. . . .
    'Ecclesiastes' is the Latinized form of the Greek
    translation of the Hebrew word, which translators
    interpreted to mean . . . , a member of the
    citizen's assembly." Seow
  • "The name "Koheleth" probably means one who
    teaches the public. . . ." Fox

3
Author Problems
  • Important Text
  • 1. The words of Qoheleth son of David, King in
    Jerusalem (11).
  • 2. The ultimate absurdity, says Qoheleth, the
    ultimate absurdity everything is absurd (12).
  • 3. I Qoheleth have been king over Israel in
    Jerusalem (112).
  • 4. Look, I have discovered this-says
    Qoheleth-adding one to one in order to find the
    sum (727).
  • 5. The ultimate absurdity, says the Qoheleth,
    everything is absurd (128).
  • 6. In addition to the fact that Qoheleth was a
    sage, he also taught the people knowledge
    (129a-b).
  • 7. Qoheleth sought to find pleasing words and
    accurately wrote down trustworthy sayings
    (1210)."

4
Author
  • "In its canonical form the identification assures
    the reader that the attack on wisdom which
    Ecclesiastes contains is not to be regarded as
    the personal idiosyncrasy of a nameless teacher.
    Rather, by his speaking in the guise of Solomon,
    whose own history now formed part of the
    community's common memory, his attack on wisdom
    was assigned an authoritative role as the final
    reflections of Solomon. As the source of
    Israel's wisdom, his words serve as an official
    corrective from within the wisdom tradition
    itself. Once this point was made, the literary
    fiction of Solomon was dropped." Childs

5
Structure
  • "The most influential is that of A. Wright, who
    sees a complex hierarchical design based on
    keywords and repeated phrases." Fox
  • Initial Poem (1.2-11)
  • I. Koheleth's Investigation of Life (1.12-6.9)
  • II. Koheleth's Conclusions (6.10-11.6)
  • Introduction (6.10-12)
  • A. Man cannot find out what is good for him to do
    (7.1-8.17)
  • B. Man does not know what will come after him
    (9.1-11.6)
  • Concluding Poem (11.7-12.8)
  • Epilogue (12.9-14)

6
Author
  • "Three things weaken the argument for viewing
    "Qoheleth" as a personal name, a substitute for
    "Solomon" (1) the use of the article (2) the
    identification of Qoheleth as a wise man
    (????????), presumably a technical term in this
    instance (129) and (3) the point of view from
    which the book is written, except for the royal
    fiction in 112-226." Crenshaw

7
Author
  • "Since the nineteenth century, critical
    scholarship has not regarded Solomon as the
    actual author, on several grounds. First of all,
    the book's language and background assumptions
    indicate a postexilic dating . . . . Second, the
    epilogue (129) does not speak of Koheleth as
    king. Koheleth takes on the role of king only in
    112-226. After that, he reveals the perspective
    of a nonroyal sage, a member of the class who may
    have contact with rulers and would have reason to
    fear their erratic anger (82-4, 9). And third,
    Koheleth blames the royal administrative
    apparatus for social injustice (57). This is
    something that Solomon, who founded the Judean
    royal administration, would not have been likely
    to do." Fox

8
Text Masoretic Text
  • "In general, the Hebrew text is in good order,
    there being relatively few textual corruptions.
    In a few places, however, the scribes seem to
    have misdivided the words . . . . There are also
    a number of Ketib-Qere readings in MT. . .
    however, the Ketib-Qere variants do not affect
    the meaning of the text." Seow

9
Text Qumran
  • Two manuscripts of the Qoheleth were discovered.
    4QQoha is dated to 175-150 BCE, while 4QQohb is
    said to have been written in the "later half of
    the first century BCE." Abegg, Flint Ulrich
  • "4QQoha-b demonstrate, as do MSS generally,
    apparently minor but occasional individual
    textual variants from what later became the
    traditional text." Ulrich

10
Text Greek
  • "The translation technique of LXX Ecclesiastes is
    unique among the books in the Bible, so that one
    may say with a reasonable amount of certainty
    that the translator is not the same as for any
    other books. The translation shows a number of
    features that are typical of the works of Aquila
    of Pontus . . . . Aquila . . . is best known for
    his translation of the Hebrew Bible into
    literalistic Greek, among other reasons, to
    provide Jews who spoke Greek but did not read
    Hebrew or Aramaic with a translation that would
    reflect the Hebrew as much as possible. Thus, the
    Hebrew word order is rigidly adhered to and all
    details in Hebrew are represented, even when they
    seem awkward or even nonsensical in Greek. . . ."
    Seow
  • ". . . LXX is not Aquila's work after all but a
    version that, like Aquila, is motivated by the
    desire to facilitate certain kinds of exegesis
    promoted by the rabbis." Seow

11
Qoheleth's Teaching
  • "Koheleth says that he set out "to study and to
    probe with wisdom all that happens under the sun"
    (113). The boldest, most radical notion in the
    book is not Koheleth's contradictions, his
    pessimism, or his observations of injustices, It
    is the belief that the individual can and should
    proceed toward truth by means of his own powers
    of perception and reasoning and that he can in
    this way discover truths previously unknown.
    There are not external rules, no doctrines or
    traditions to which his conclusions must conform.
    This is the approach of philosophy, and its
    appearance in Ecclesiastes probably reflects a
    Jewish awareness of this type of thinking among
    foreign intellectuals." Fox

12
Qoheleth's Teaching - Crenshaw
  • "According to the thematic statement in 12 and
    128, he sought to demonstrate the claim that
    life lacked profit and therefore was totally
    absurd. In support of this thesis, Qoheleth
    argued (1) that wisdom could not achieve its
    goal (2) that a remote God ruled over a crooked
    world and (3) death did not take virtue or vice
    into consideration. Hence (4), he advocated
    enjoyment as the wisest course of action during
    youth before the cares of advancing years made
    that response impossible." Crenshaw

13
  • "To sum up, Qoheleth taught by means of various
    literary types that earlier optimistic claims
    about wisdom's power to secure one's existence
    have no validity. No discernible principle of
    order governs the universe, rewarding virtue and
    punishing evil. The creator, distant and
    uninvolved, acts as judge only (if at all) in
    extreme cases of flagrant affront (for example,
    reneging on religious vows). Death cancels all
    imagined gains, rendering life under the sun
    absurd. Therefore the best policy is to enjoy
    one's wife, together with good food and drink,
    during youth, for old age and death will soon put
    an end to this "relative" good. In short,
    Qoheleth examined all of life and discovered no
    absolute good that would survive death's effect.
    He then proceeded to report this discovery and to
    counsel young people on the best option in the
    light of stark reality. It follows that Qoheleth
    bears witness to an intellectual crisis in
    ancient Israel, at least in the circles among
    whom he taught." Crenshaw

14
Qoheleth's Teaching Fox
  • 1. The Problem. "The underlying issue that
    Ecclesiastes addresses is the possibility of
    meaningfulness in life. For events to be
    meaningful, they would have to cohere in a
    comprehensive picture."
  • "A life with a strict correspondence between deed
    and consequence, virtue and reward, vice and
    punishment, would make sense."
  • "Koheleth is frustrated that life does not make
    sense in this way. . . . Frustrated by such
    incoherence and irrationality, Koheleth calls the
    world hevel 'senseless' or 'absurd'."

15
Qoheleth's Teaching Fox
  • 2. Affirmations. "Koheleth is not a nihilist.
    "Everything is absurd" is to be understood as
    expressing a general characterization of life,
    not as an absolute proposition negating all
    possible activities and values."
  • "Koheleth does find some things worthwhile
    moderate work temperate enjoyment of the
    pleasures that come to hand love and friendship
    gaining and using whatever wisdom is within our
    capacity being reasonably righteous fearing
    God and hoping for divine justice."

16
Qoheleth's Teaching Fox
  • 3. God. "Koheleth speaks of God with no warmth
    and expects no fellowship from Him. God controls
    the details of human life but keeps a distance."

17
Qoheleth's Teaching Fox
  • "This is not an encouraging theology, nor is it
    meant to be. For Koheleth seeks to open eyes to
    the world as he sees it, and this world is a grim
    one . . . . In most of the Bible, God has
    relations, whether loving or hostile, to nations
    and individuals and God though not fully
    predictable almost always acts in accordance
    with transparent principles of justice. But the
    entirety of biblical thought does not reside in
    every book. Ecclesiastes must be read as one
    voice adding a unique perspective to the diverse
    collection of ideas that constitute the Bible."

18
Qoheleth's Teaching Fox
  • 4. Doubt and Belief. ". . Koheleth never sets
    forth a conventional idea as an erroneous dogma
    that he proposes to defeat or modify. He never
    distances himself from the principles he finds
    contradicted. . . . Koheleth holds to conflicting
    ideas, and he is troubled."

19
Qoheleth's Teaching Fox
  • "Koheleth places himself among the wise and shows
    no awareness that his observations clash with the
    beliefs of other sages. He does not attack the
    principle of retributive justice . . . . He
    believes in divine justice but sees it
    contradicted, and . . . throws up his hands in
    frustration and calls what he see hevel."

20
Qoheleth's Teaching Fox
  • 5. The Epilogue (Another Voice) "The epilogue
    looks back and evaluates Koheleth from a more
    conventional and conservative standpoint,
    assuring the reader that he was a wise and
    eloquent teacher, but also warning that the words
    of the wise hold certain dangers. What is most
    important? Fearing God, obeying His commandments,
    and living in awareness of God's ultimate
    judgment."
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com