Title: Reengineering patient flow: Directions for a system wide approach
1Re-engineering patient flow Directions for a
system wide approach
- ACHSE CONFERENCE
- APRIL 8
- Dr Tony OConnell
2The problem to be solved. Worsening access
block Worsening off-stretcher times Rising
occupancy rates Inefficiencies in patient
flow Falling capacity to perform elective surgery
with rising waiting lists
3(No Transcript)
4Understanding the current situation - Demand.
Who are the customers?
5Extra 100,000 older people within 7 yrs.
6Hunter data
7The older the patient, the more likely a delay in
ED
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Mental Health
We frequently have Mental Health patients for
days - ED
Workshop Takes up to a week to get a consult
- Inpatient Workshop
11Sustainable Access Plan 563 beds
12(No Transcript)
13Front Door
Inpatients
Community
14A New Vision Integrating Management
Workforce / Professions
IMT
Funding
Facilities
Community Services
Consumer Involvement
Management
Hospital Services
15The Access Block Improvement Program..
16A new approach.
- Increased bed capacity
- Clinical Service Redesign Program
- Patient Flow Units
- Integrated Aged Care Service
- Emergency Dept Demand Mgt
- Predictable Surgery Program
- Partnership for Performance
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19Each Unit will proactively manage patient flow.
- Data to be monitored
- Unit will use Bed Board to monitor status of
patient flow data and early warning signs. Data
monitored includes - Predict Patient Flow based on Historical Trends
- Predicted admissions
- Predict discharges
- Demand data
- ED data (number of presentations, waiting for
bed) - Planned surgery lists
- Type of patients (eg number of elderly, etc)
- Supply data
- Detailed bed data ( open, closed, occupancy)2
- Staff availability trends (eg Medical officer
leave, school holiday leave, sick leave, etc) - Key Patient Flow data / Early Warning Signs3
- Access Block
- Number of inter-hospital transfer patients
- Number of patients waiting on diagnostic tests /
key interventions (eg Cardiac Catheterisation) - Estimated Day of Discharge information
- Estimation of long stay patients
- Demand for nursing home and rehabilitation beds
Each Unit will use a Bed Board1
Notes 1 In the short term, a simple Microsoft
Excel dashboard could be established until the
advanced version is built and tested. 2
Accurate data, particularly data regarding bed
availability is required. This will be
facilitated via PiMS (or equivalent) 3 Some
data collection will need to be manually
collected (e.g. via daily bed meetings, etc)
before it is entered into the Bed Board. Early
warning signs will need to be identified and
customised by each site, and may need to be
limited in their number (eg 5 data sources)
20(No Transcript)
21Actions will be specific to each early warning
sign.
Early Warning Sign Activated
Potential Responses
Hospital Bed Board
- Implement communications via usual management
processes - Use flex beds to accommodate extra patients
- Pre-organise extra staff member(s) to care for
extra patients - Move some patients to other hospitals (if
appropriate) - Delay non-urgent inter-hospital transfers
- Notify Surgeons and attempt to prioritise
operating list
Surgery1
DOSA admissions this day
15
22
DOSA admissions tomorrow
DOSA admissions in 7 days
25
- Implement communications via usual management
processes - Move some patients to sub-acute or private
hospitals (if appropriate) (via service
agreement) - Activate contracts with some GPs (selective) to
help manage some patients
Delays in Discharge
Number of long stay patients
4
Waits for nursing home bed
6
Waits for rehabilitation bed
4
- Notes
- In some hospitals, capping daily DOSA admissions
has proven to be an effective method of managing
overall hospital load. - Need to ensure early warning signs are reviewed
at a defined time to ensure preventative measures
can be made (review of early warning signs at 8am
is too late)
22The bottom lineKey Performance Indicators
- Access Block
- Off-Stretcher Time
- Elective Surgery waiting lists
23Factors for success
- Success across ten/eleven sites was variable
- By project and hospital
- Sometimes cultural and mindset change did not
equal impact on KPIs - Important Factors
- Clinician engagement
- Executive sponsorship/commitment
- Capacity (beds, resources)
- Metrics (performance driven management)
24Synergies for success
Executive drive
Capacity
Transformational Change!
Clinician engagement
Flow Visibility of KPIs
25Clinical Service Redesign Program
- Business Process Redesign in all AHSs
- Three year program
- Teams with external facilitator assistance in
every AHS
26Clinical Service Redesign Program
- Engaging clinicians and front line staff
- Patients and staff working together to identify
issues - Expert external assistance to facilitate and
effect skills transfer - Clinicians prioritising and redesigning processes
- Management support for implementation
27Clinical Service Redesign Program
- Clinical Redesign units in each Area Health
Service - Core positions and project positions for projects
to address priority issues - Backfill for clinicians to redesign processes and
lead implementation
28What do we want.. Facilities that work
efficiently Patients that are satisfied Staff
that are satisfied Value for money Quality
practice Smooth patient flow through services