It does not have to be everything: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

It does not have to be everything:

Description:

Are sociable people. Have mild to moderate LD and are not literate or minimally so ... Sociable and with a very supportive family. Attending Local independent ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Bre83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: It does not have to be everything:


1
It does not have to be everything Trying to
balance communication and access.
Helen Millward Occupational Therapist Chris
Sherlock Speech and Language Therapist Access to
Communication and Technology CM 2008
2
Introduction to Access to Communication and
Technology (ACT)
  • Helpline 0121 472 0754 Website
    www.actwmids.nhs.uk
  • Email format Firstname.Secondname_at_sbpct.nhs.uk
  • Main phone number 0121 627 8235
  • Address ACT, WMRC, 91 Oak Tree Lane, Selly Oak,
    Birmingham. B29 6JA
  • Regional NHS Tertiary Assistive Technology
    Service all ages and conditions Mission
    statement
  • To work with patients / clients and their local
    teams to assess for and provide techniques and
    technologies which optimise the potential for
    communication and control.
  • Staff OT, SLT, Clinical Scientists, Workshop
    Team, Administrators about 30 people.
  • Other teams in UK are similar but each is unique
  • NB WM AAC Care pathway version 3

3
Introduction to ACT
4
Learning outcomes
  • After attending this presentation participants
    will have considered
  • Some pros and cons of 3 systems of vocabulary
    organisation
  • Narrative based
  • Phrase based
  • Linguistically organised single words
  • The impact of access methods and access effort on
    the choices made about vocabulary storage when
    using VOCAs
  • Communication functions choices/priorities for
    different AAC users.
  • Some choices to be made about digitised and
    synthesized speech

5
Why we are discussing this topic?
  • As a team and with local colleagues we have moved
    away from off the shelf vocabulary packages
    towards bespoke narrative based packages.
  • The more effortful the access for the client the
    more we have moved towards bespoke programming
  • The communication functions for which these
    clients use their AAC has also dictated the
    paths we have taken.
  • Characteristically these clients
  • Are sociable people
  • Have mild to moderate LD and are not literate or
    minimally so
  • Are out of school/in later school years (post 16)
  • Communicate in a number of different environments
    and have a number of different strategies.
  • Have families who skilfully and richly interpret
    their non verbal and spoken communication.

6
Main theoretical points
  • Achieving a Balance between AAC and non
    verbal/residual speech in someones
    communication emphasis on augmenting existing
    communication in clients who are in the
    expressive language group for AAC
  • Vocab storage/ organisation methods what are
    they good for?
  • Language based
  • Narrative based (telling ones own self
    defining stories)
  • Phrase based
  • Taxonomic V Schematic issues
  • Vocabulary for Social closeness
  • Access effort
  • Synthesized and digitised speech

7
Expressive language group
  • Expressive language group these are individuals
    whose language comprehension may be good, but due
    to physical impairment they are not able to
    produce verbal speech. Included in this group
    might be people with cerebral palsy. These
    individuals will need AAC as a permanent means of
    expression, to be used in all situations.
    Although they may understand spoken language,
    they will require AAC input as a model to assist
    them to learn how to use their system.
  • Martinsen, H von Tetzchner, S (1996)

8
Achieving a Balance effort and message (1)
  • Clients are able to get many of their wants and
    needs across using their residual communication
    skills with their familiar communication
    partners. Even though we would describe them as
    being in the expressive language group.
  • Using these residual communication methods is
    less effortful than using a voice output
    communication aid.
  • Using residual communication methods can put more
    of the responsibility for the communication onto
    the communication partner.
  • BUT

9
Achieving a Balance effort and message (2)
  • The communication of narrative
  • Which is motivating
  • Reusable but needs recalling and choosing
  • This is where the effort to retrieve the story
    from the AAC system becomes more worthwhile to
    the person and the effort for the communication
    partner can be reduced.
  • Having a system that is weighted towards larger
    narrative chunks for clients can potentially be
    the best focus for their AAC system.

10
Vocab storage/ organisation methods
  • Mainly Dynamic screen VOCAs
  • (also include medium and low tech AAC)
  • Making some slightly artificial distinctions. A
    lot of cross over now
  • Can still put aspects of Minspeak based AAC into
    the picture.

11
Vocab storage/ organisation methods
  • Language based pages based on a left to right
    sentence building structure single word or short
    phrase/selection. Related pages with topic based
    words and parts of speech e.g. Little words,
    verbs, describing words. Personalisation space
    available E.g. Gateway (mainly taxonomic)
  • Pros very flexible for novel utterances, useful
    for those with stronger language skills,
    meta-linguistic skills and navigational skills.
    Finding high content single words/short phrases.
  • Cons laborious for building complex/structured
    output. Very limited for intonation even with
    digitised speech. Can lack space for longer
    personalized output or this is buried.

12
Vocab storage/ organisation methods
  • Narrative based Pages based on longer utterances
    that tell or build to tell personal stories and
    might/should include phrases to be used to engage
    a communication partner. E.g. aspects of
    INTERAACT pages by DynaVox.
  • Concept of re-useable communication (Waller and
    Newell 1997)
  • Pros expresses the personality, interests and
    memories of the person easily, shares
    communication that is self defining and more
    closely to real time. Big output pay off for
    selection of a few items.
  • Cons needs designing and creating with careful
    structuring and lots of updating, less novel or
    flexible output. Reduced range of interactions
    possible.

13
Vocab storage/ organisation methods
  • Phrase based pages of a schematic style that
    relate to communication within and about a topic,
    situation or event. Spoken output is
    characteristically phrase and sentence based.
    Typically adaptations of basic off the shelf
    page sets.
  • Pros some flexibility and novel output possible.
    Relatively easy to structure. More output per
    selection(s).
  • Cons Lots of pages needed to cover a wide range
    of situations, needs updating and developing.
    Reduced flexibility. Less suitable for
    synthesized speech?

14
Vocab storage/ organisation methods
  • Taxonomic organization refers to a hierarchical
    system of categories that are related to one
    another by means of class inclusion.
    Foodgtpizzagtthin crust
  • Schematic Organization includes items related to
    scenes or event scripts that are based on
    functional organising principles. Circle time
    teacher/time table/sing/show/

15
Vocabulary for Social closeness
  • Light (1998) identified that a key function of
    communication was for social closeness and that
    this could be achieved through the sharing of
    narrative.
  • For example
  • Narrative about the life of patients in acute/ICU
    settings has been shown to help staff caring for
    people to see them more holistically
  • The communication passport/life book process
    supports the communication of the AAC user in a
    range of ways including memory, sharing stories
    and broadening the perceptions of communication
    partners about the person.

16
Vocabulary for Social closeness
  • Aims to Establish and maintain and or develop
    personal relationships
  • By focussing on the interpersonal relationship
  • May be lengthy but might be somewhat predictable
    or have a wide scope
  • Rate may not be important
  • There will be some tolerance for communication
    break down
  • Usually 2 people or only a small group
  • The communicator does not have to be independent.
  • Communication partners are often familiar with
    each other.

17
Access effort
  • It is recognised that using a voice out put
    communication aid is slower than using a voice.
  • The speed of vocabulary retrieval can be slowed
    even more if an individual has additional
    requirements accessing it such as
  • Use of alternative access method like switches or
    joystick requiring the additional learning to
    understand the process of selecting the
    vocabulary as well as the effort to get to that
    vocabulary.
  • Effort required to maintain general trunk
    stability to allow for movement to directly
    access a device with a functional level of
    accuracy.

18
Access effort
  • Experience suggests that there is also a greater
    impact on cognitive load if there is an
    additional access method or if the individual is
    having to concentrate on maintaining their
    position.
  • For some individuals this can impact on their
    motivation for using a communication aid and this
    motivation can be impaired if they have limited
    response to the output they retrieve.

19
Synthesized and digitised speech
  • Speech from VOCAs is retrieved and generated
    either by synthesis
  • or
  • digitised speech recording and playback.
  • VOCAs with synthesized speech usually also store
    some digitised speech but not V.V.
  • For narrative and longer voice out put each
    system has its strengths and weaknesses

20
Strengths and weaknesses
  • E.g.
  • Digitised speech gives a more natural flow and
    emphasize emotions such as humour and perhaps
    indicate communicative intent better through
    intonation.
  • Synthesized speech make take less long to load
    when selected than Digitized speech
  • In aids where photos are being used the memory
    load on a purely digitised speech dynamic screen
    device can be significant, and may slow the aid
    down.

21
Case study 1 Wendy
  • Woman, 22 years with Athetoid CP and
    mild-moderate learning difficulties. No
    intelligible speech.
  • Sociable and with a very supportive family
  • Attending Local independent day centre
  • Participates in holidays/club with PHAB
  • Respite overnights
  • Might move to independent living.
  • Access method 2 switch using a slide switch. Very
    effortful.

22
Case study 1 W
  • Using a communication aid first from aged 8
  • Majority of school time using a range of formal
    off the shelf language based vocab packages
    which she could use to build short sentences in
    structured settings but usually used in a single
    high content word approach to contextualize
    message.
  • Single familiar and motivating word recognition
    for reading
  • First letter generation for spelling familiar
    words.

23
Case study 1 W
  • Communication with family etc able to make wants
    and needs known with non verbal communication and
    shared knowledge and some no tech AAC approaches
    for choices.
  • W wanted an aid that would allow her to
    participate in discussion about college outings
    and tell stories about her nephew.

24
Case study 1 W
  • Development of bespoke communication package

A vocabulary package was developed and has
continued to be updated to maintain the
usefulness of the programming. It consists of 40
location pages with quick phrases on the first
two rows, link pages on the bottom 3 rows.
Synthesized speech.
25
Case study 1 W
  • Link buttons go to a page which are set up with
    more specific vocabulary of a schematic and or
    narrative type.
  • The narrative stories are set up with the
    potential for turn taking
  • and developing expansion of the story.
  • Big pay off for single selection in terms of
    length of voice output.
  • There is a link button on the majority of pages
    with access to sentence building vocabulary and
    the potential to build novel messages. This is
    rarely used.

26
Case study 1 W
  • W is using this style of vocabulary to a greater
    extent than previous systems.
  • She is using it at college and recent effort has
    been put in to encourage her to use it when she
    goes into respite care.
  • W is able to get high reward vocabulary from
    limited number of key activations.
  • It has required a high level of support to keep
    the vocabulary up to date and current.

27
Case study 1 W
  • Challenges/pros and cons
  • Creating the programme to begin with is time
    consuming and involves lots of work on
    Vocabulary.
  • Problems recently when output did not match what
    was needed and longer output could not be stopped
    by W.
  • Keeping it up to date.
  • Still very effortful to access and this affects
    practice
  • The Computer access linked in with email access
    has encouraged Ws use of the vocabulary to put
    into emails.
  • System needs to be supplemented by use of Low
    tech for quicker messages e.g. about basic needs.
  • Communication partners are crucial.

28
Case study 2 Reena
  • R is 9. She currently has a MT4 with Gateway 60
    on it.
  • R has cerebral palsy of an athetoid type with
    marked dystonic movements of her right arm which
    she chooses to have stabilised on the arm of her
    chair by tethering.
  • R demonstrates understanding/comprehension at
    above 5 information carrying words.
  • R directly accesses her MT4.
  • she is able to stabilise her index finger of her
    left hand.
  • Respite care overnights at school
  • Brownies at school
  • Family have many animals and live in the country.

29
Case study 2 R
  • Communication
  • Has Gateway 60 package
  • Communicates with her family mainly using non
    verbal communication single words, able to
    communicate his wants and needs in this way with
    rich interpretation and shared knowledge.
  • R is able to participate in discussion using her
    VOCA mainly using single high content words and
    rich interpretation from experienced
    communication partner.
  • I.e. expression does not match comprehension
    Multi-factorial reasons for this.
  • Rs local school team have personalised her
    programming with pages of schematic and
    pragmatically based longer utterance Vocabulary.
  • R is asking for more of the same particularly
    jokes and phrases.

30
Case study 2 R
  • Challenges/pros and cons
  • Maintaining programming including longer
    utterances
  • Motivating her to use more of the language based
    package
  • Supporting her to develop his language skills
    with the aid

31
Discussion
  • Common themes
  • Clients who can not programme for themselves
  • Still a big effort to produce utterances that
    have power and are motivating
  • Level of non augmented communication that the
    person has in some situations
  • Wanting to have communication for social
    closeness humour and sharing stories about their
    lives
  • Level of effort to prepare the bespoke
    programming
  • Local level maintenance and development of
    current narrative based vocabulary

32
Discussion it is late.BUT!
  • It appears that a significant theme of CM 2008 is
    around narrative in Augmentative and Alternative
    Communication.
  • Are there any overall messages emerging from
    this?
  • Should most AAC for Expressive language AAC users
    with increased access effort/decreased access
    efficiency be of a narrative type?
  • What are the experiences of the group?
  • What are the messages we should give to
    manufacturers?

33
Conclusions
  • A system does not have to be everything for
    clients
  • Concentrating on narrative for many clients is
    motivating
  • It is a lot of work for everyone but this is
    Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
  • There have to be alternatives for other
    communication e.g. low tech/no tech/speech
  • Issues of access can influence how much choose to
    go down the route of narrative/ chunk type
    programming
  • Thank you and a safe journey home

34
References
  • Fallon, K.A., Light, J. Achenbach, A. 2003 The
    semantic organization patterns of Young Children
    Implications for Augmentative and Alternative
    Communication. Augmentative and Alternative
    Communication June 2003 Vol. 19 (2)
  • Goossens, C., Crain, S.S. Elder, P. S. 1992
    Engineering the preschool environment for
    interactive symbolic communication. Southeast
    Augmentative Communication Conference
    Publications
  • Light, J. 1998 Interaction involving individuals
    using Augmentative and Alternative Communication
    systems state of the art and future directions.
    Augmentative and Alternative Communication
    4,66-82
  • Martinsen, H von Tetzchner, S (1996) Situating
    augmentative and alternative language
    intervention In S von Tetzchner M Hygum Jensen
    (eds) (1996) Augmentative and Alternative
    Communication European Perspectives. Whurr
    Publishers Ltd. London
  • MacAulay, F, Etchels, M. Judson, A., Ashraf, S.,
    Ricketts, I.W., Waller, A., Brodie, J. K., Alm,
    N., Warden, A. Shearer, A. J. 2003 ICU-Talk an
    AAC device for intubated patients in Intensive
    care. Communication matters Vol.17 No.1
  • MacDonald, A. Siggs, M. (2007) Beyond the
    symbol chart. Chat books and want cards.
    Communication Matters Vol 21 No 1 April 2007
  • Milkin, C.C. 1997 Symbol systems and Vocabulary
    selection strategies. in The Handbook of
    Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
    Glennen, S. DeCoste, D. C. 1997
  • Szeto, A.Y.J., Allen, E.J. Littrell, M.C.
    1993. Comparison of speed and accuracy for
    selected electronic communication devices and
    input methods. Augmentative and Alternative
    Communication, Volume 9, Issue 4 December 1993.
  • Waller. A, (2006). Communication Access to
    Conversational Narrative. Topics in Language
    Disorders. Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 221239.
  • Waller, A, Newell, A.F. 1997 Towards a
    narrative-based augmentative communication
    system. EJDC Vol.32 No.3 Special Issue
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com