ECMWF/GEO Workshop on Atmospheric Reanalysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ECMWF/GEO Workshop on Atmospheric Reanalysis

Description:

Held at ECMWF, 19 ... 2005 NASA/NOAA/NSF Workshop on the Development of Improved ... Homogenisation of radiosonde data. Sea-surface temperature and sea-ice ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: Isabell64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECMWF/GEO Workshop on Atmospheric Reanalysis


1
ECMWF/GEO Workshop on Atmospheric Reanalysis
  • Held at ECMWF, 19-22 June 2006
  • Programme for the meeting was developed in
    liaison with WOAP and AOPC
  • Followed
  • 2005 NASA/NOAA/NSF Workshop on the Development of
    Improved Observational Data Sets for Reanalysis
  • 2005 ECMWF/NWP-SAF Workshop on Bias Estimation
    and Correction in Data Assimilation
  • 2005 ECMWF Workshop on a potential European
    Regional Reanalysis project (EURRA)
  • 2006 SCAR/CliC/ICPM Workshop on High Latitude
    Reanalysis

2
ECMWF/GEO Workshop on Atmospheric Reanalysis
  • 21 participants from outside ECMWF (including
    Kent, Lorenc and Trenberth from WOAP)
  • 29 presentations covering
  • Experience and plans of reanalysis centres
  • Status and needs for reanalysis user views
  • Developments in data assimilation for reanalysis
  • Observations and boundary forcing fields
  • Other aspects
  • Presentations may be viewed at
  • http//www.ecmwf.int/newsevents/meetings/workshops
    /

3
Plenary Discussion User Aspects
  • The user base
  • The number of users of reanalysis products is
    considerable
  • User base is broad, and extends well beyond
    climate research community
  • Specific user requirements
  • Full range of user activities was not
    represented, but workshop discussed
  • Dynamical processes
  • High-latitude processes
  • Analysis quality for pre-satellite era
  • Chemical transport modelling
  • Long-term continuity and balance
  • Horizontal resolution
  • Additional output products
  • Precipitation and surface fields

4
Plenary Discussion User Aspects
  • General user requirements
  • Comprehensive documentation of reanalyses
  • Mechanism for exchange of information originating
    from users
  • Measures of expected accuracy or uncertainty
  • Statistical correction of products
  • Continuation in CDAS mode
  • Remote access to data assimilation system to
    perform OSEs
  • Involvement in User Advisory Groups
  • Period for future reanalysis
  • For many users, satellite era is sufficient and
    improvements are still needed here
  • Some interest in data back to 1940s or 1930s
  • Reanalysis further back in time based on analysis
    of only surface data is feasible

5
Plenary Discussion Observations and boundary
and forcing fields
  • Observations for assimilation in reanalyses
  • Working Group on The On-going Development of
    Improved Observational Data Sets for Reanalysis
    supported
  • Distributed data centres working to common,
    managed standards and purpose, including feedback
    from reanalysis centres
  • Satellite requirements essentially covered by
    supplement to the GCOS Implementation Plan
  • Data recovery needs to continue
  • Data from field experiments or reference
    observation sites are needed, preferably in
    near-real-time for monitoring and use in CDASs
  • Also considered
  • Homogenisation of radiosonde data
  • Sea-surface temperature and sea-ice distributions
  • Vegetation
  • Snow cover
  • Precipitation
  • Composition

6
Plenary Discussion Data assimilation
  • Long-window, weak-constraint 4D-var
  • Error estimation
  • to provide information for users
  • for adaptive specification of analysis statistics
  • Adaptive correction of
  • model biases
  • observational biases
  • Monitoring
  • Coupled assimilation
  • ocean waves, ocean circulation, land surface,
    CTMs

7
Plenary Discussion Organizational issues
  • International coordination
  • Role of WOAP and AOPC
  • Issues are essentially as discussed in last
    years WOAP paper
  • Healthy level of collaboration between reanalysis
    teams (and with data providers) at the working
    level
  • Data policy issues were not discussed
    systematically, but points raised have been built
    into report, drawing on policy from ten-year
    implementation plan for GEOSS
  • Need for long-term institutional funding for
    reanalysis
  • Lifetime of a particular reanalysis can be a
    decade or more
  • Expertise and experience should be maintained
  • Ongoing advocacy for reanalysis from the
    committees, panels and working groups of GEO,
    GCOS and WCRP is still necessary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com