Title: EUDIMENSIONS Local Dimensions of a Wider European Neighborhood: Developing Political Community Throu
1EUDIMENSIONSLocal Dimensions of a Wider
European Neighborhood Developing Political
Community Through Practices and Discourses of
Cross-Border Co-Operation
- Center For Black Sea and Central Asia (KORA)
- Middle East Technical University (METU)
- Ankara/ TURKEY
- November 2007
2About the Study
- This presentation reflects the preliminary
findings of the fieldwork conducted within the
framework of the EUDIMENSIONS Project. In the
first stage of the fieldwork, we conducted 20
in-depth interviews (including basic interviews)
The sample includes 14 gender and womens
organizations, 4 human rights organizations and 2
environmental organizations. The fieldwork was
conducted both in Ankara and Istanbul. - Sampling criteria All organizations are chosen
from the NGO Directory in Turkey.Those who are
not included in this directory but known to be
active in their respective fields are also
included into the sample. We are also informed by
the experts working on gender and womens
studies, environment and human rights. - All NGOs are those whose activities are mainly
concentrated on their respective fields. This
means that other types of organizations who
previously dealt with issues related to gender,
human rights and/or environment on project basis
are not included into the sample. -
-
3Outline of the Presentation
- 1) background information on NGOs
- 2) civil society and cooperation
- 3) civil society, neighborhood and EU
- 4) perceptions on the EU and Europeanness
-
4Themes
- Within the framework of these four headings in
the interview guide, we identified following
headings as subtopic. - -main types of activities
- - major sources of funding and financial
difficulties - - relations with media
- - views on the role of civil society in Turkey
- - state and civil society relations
- - patterns of cooperation among civil society
organizations at local level - - international/transnational cooperation
- - cooperation with neighboring countries
including Greece - - perceptions about Europeanness
- - perceptions about the EU and Turkeys
membership to the EU - - impact of the EU on civil society development
in Turkey
5The List of Interviews
- Womens Organizations
- Flying Broom
- Turkish Mothers Association
- Amargi Womens Cooperative
- Filmmor Womens Cooperative
- Womens Solidarity Foundation
- Capital City Womens Platform
- Association of Republics Women
- IRIS Equality and Observation Group
- Womens Entrepreneurs Association of Turkey
- Womens Rights Association Against Discrimination
- Womens Library and Information Center Foundation
- The Foundation for Contemporary Women and Youth
- The Association for the Protection of Women and
Solidarity - Kirkörük Cooperative for Combating Violence
Against Women
6The List of Interviews
- Human Rights Organizations
- Kaos GL Association
- Human Rights Association
- 3.Human Rights Foundation of Turkey
- 4. Organization for Human Rights and Solidarity
for Oppressed People
7The List of Interviews
- Environmental Organizations
- Nature Association
- The Foundation for the Promotion and Protection
of the Environment and Cultural Heritage
8Background Information on the Womens Movement
and Womens NGOs in Turkey
- Womens movement in Turkey dates back to the
Ottoman Empire but it is often referred as
newsocial movement starting from late 1980s.
Womens movement in Turkey can be described as
the most active, powerful and organised one among
other types of civic activism after the 1980s. As
of 2007, there are around 800 womens
organizations in Turkey. It is possible to
classify womens organizations as feminists,
secularist and faith-based. Womens organizations
are mainly working on following issues violence
against women, womens entrepreneurship, womens
human rights, culture, arts and communication,
womens shelters, legal reforms for gender
equality, political participation and
representation, poverty, education and Turkeys
membership to the EU. One of the peculiarity of
the womens NGOs in Turkey is that they become
more project- oriented rather than expressing
their views through mass movements, civic
activism, meetings and protests. The EU and its
related funds are one of the main reasons of this
shift.
9Background Information on Human Rights Movement
and Human Rights Organizations in Turkey
- The earlier Turkish human righst organizations
were formed by groups made up of political
activists, trade unionists, members of student
associations of the 1960s and 1970s (Ergun
Cali, 2006). By the end of 1980, domestic NGOs
developed a strong network that included
international governmental agencies and
non-governmental organizations and reporting and
monitoring methods of addressing violations of
civil and political human rights. The 1990s also
witnessed diversification and proliferation of
human rights activism in Turkey (Cali, 2006)
10Background Information on Environmental Movement
and Environmental Organizations in Turkey
- Environmental movements of the pre-1980
represent the embryonic stage of environmental
activism in Turkey during which problem
identification and consciousness raising took the
centre stage. In 1970s participation level and
political efficacy of the environmental
organizations remained low. The Ministry of
Environment was established in 1991 and after the
HABITAT II Conference in 1996, 67 environmental
NGOs formed the Environmental Caucus of Turkey.
11Main Types of Activities
- Womens Organizations
- Research
- Festivals
- Lobbying
- Fund Rising
- Public Protest
- Press conferences
- Project based activities
- Documentation and Publishing
- Organizing campaigns, meetings, conferences, etc.
12Main Types of Activities
- Human Rights Organizations
- Campaigns
- Press Releases
- Press Conferences
- Project-based activities
- Documentation and Publishing
- Human Rights Violations Reports
- Organizing meetings, conferences, seminars, etc.
13Main Types of Activities
- Environmental Organizations
- Research
- Lobbying
- Publishing
- Campaigns
- Summer Schools
- Educational seminars
- Project-based activities
- Organizing meetings, conferences, seminars, etc.
14Financial Resources and Difficulties
- Most of the civil society organizations in
Turkey do not have equity capital and most of
them and especially the most active one have
financial difficulties. The membership fees are
not regularly paid. Even if they are paid, they
cannot meet the needs of NGOs. Sustainability
becomes and remains as the main concern for the
members of the organizations. In order to
maintain the organizations, different strategies
are adopted. Some organizations remain small and
rely on membership fees, some prefer to get funds
from several resources (including projects) and
some rely on voluntarism. Foreign assistance and
international funds are mostly preferred as the
main resource of funding. Most of the
organizations have project-based activities
supported by the EU funds. Organizations,
critical to state policies mostly womens
organizations and human rights organizations-
either cannot get state funds or do not prefer to
do so. Moreover, some organizations get financial
support from local administrations,
governorships, state institutions and ministries,
but this support is not institutionalized
rather, based on individual preferences for the
sake of favoring the EU policies i.e. to develop
a partnership with civil society organizations.
15Relations with Media and Representation
- All civil society organizations have relations
with media either through their members from the
media institutions or through representatives of
media who are known as being sensitive to NGOs
activities. Some womens organizations described
their relations with media as non-coherent in the
sense that they are critical of womens
representation in mainstream media. Some
organizations have their own supporting media
groups especially the left and adversary media
groups are more inclined to human rights
organizations and some of the womens
organizations. The general view about media is
that they would be more interested in sensational
news than representation of civil societal
activities. However, environmental organizations
relations with media seem to be less problematic
and their activities are widely covered in the
media. They are seen as the best information
providers on environmental issues.
16The Role of the Civil Society
- There is no agreed definition of civil society
and its roles among the organizations. However,
there are two main understandings depending on
organizations political standing. The minority
of the organizations interviewed -mostly
secularist, nationalist organizations- defines
the role of civil society as complementary to the
state. The majority of the organizations however
is uncomfortable of state and public opinion
attributing a role of service provider to CSOs.
They felt in a secondary status compared to trade
unions, trade associations and chambers of
commerce. This group of organizations actually
defines the role of civil society as being
critical of state policies and affecting them,
producing alternative policies through reflecting
the needs and views of the public. Most of the
CSOs argue that the culture of civil society in
Turkey is under formation and their ability to
affect state policies and to shape public opinion
remains weak.
17State and Civil Society Relations
- Almost all of the organizations have relations
either with central and local administrations,
public institutions or ministries and run joint
actions aiming to affect decision making
mechanisms, legal processes and state policies.
In most cases they do not have relations with
political parties. They are critical of state
representatives attitude towards civil society
and mention that there exist no permanent and
institutionalized relations. They are either
associated through issue-based, project-based
activities or through confrontation especially on
legal issues such as Turkish Penal Code as in
the case of womens organizations- and the 301.
article of Constitution as in the case of human
rights organizations-.
18Civil Society Cooperation at the Local Level
- Common to all organizations is their cooperation
with NGOs working on the same field and/or the
same issue. Womens organizations have numerous
issue-based joint actions and easily react to the
rapidly changing agendas. Platforms such as
Turkish Penal Code Womens Platform, Civic Code
Platform formed by womens NGOs have been very
successful. Recently the Constitution Platform
was formed by womens organizations. Human rights
organizations have close ties and they also work
jointly under Human Rights Joint Platform (IHOP).
Environmental organizations also cooperate with
each other. Most womens NGOs have uneasy
relations with local administrations and state
institutions. Human rights organizations have
close relations with unions whereas environmental
organizations have good ties with local
administrations and governorships.
19Civil Society Cooperation at International Level
- Most of the organizations have relations with
international organizations. Especially the ones
working with professionalized staff and realizing
project-based activities are more engaged with
foreign organizations and run projects. Among
womens organizations, feminist organizations
have more joint projects with international and
European organizations. Three of them are members
of the European Womens Lobby. Human rights
organizations and environmental organizations
also have international ties. Most of them have
realised activities with the EU member states,
along with some neighboring countries such as
Bulgaria, Iran and Armenia.
20Civil Society Cooperationwith Neighbouring
Countries and Greece
- Some of the organizations interviewed have
joint actions mostly project based cooperation
with neighboring countries including Iran,
Albania, Armenia, Georgia, Greece and Bulgaria.
Two of the organizations interviewed have joint
actions with Greek NGOs. Womens organizations
have ties with womens NGOs in Greece either
through mutual visits or EWL. They are mostly
open to cooperation activities with Greek NGOs
but dont have any ties yet. In order to act
cooperatively with Greece and other neighboring
countries the choice of the issue and the partner
organization is primary concern. And they prefer
to act cooperatively, mostly with Greece, due to
cultural similarities.
21Perceptions of Europeanness
-
- There exist three different approaches to define
Europeanness one is positive, the other is
negative and the third is critical. Europeannes
is mostly associated with democracy, culture and
life style by womens organizations. It is mostly
criticised due to its association with being
individualistic, interest-oriented, formalistic.
The critical approach either defines Europeanness
as a constructed identity or mentions that there
exists no homegenous European identity. Human
rights organizations are mostly critical to the
concept of Europeanness. For them, its defining
characteristics are religion and morality
oriented definitions and it is exclusive. They
consider Europeanness as a value system for
human rights which is not exclusively possessed
only by European countries. All organizations
agreed on the fact that there should not be a
single definition of Europeanness and it that
changes in different cultures of European
countries. Yet, Europeanness is associated with
better living standards, advanced information
technologies, better GNP, and being more advanced
in terms of human rights, childrens rights and
womens human rights.
22Impacts of European Union on civil society in
Turkey
- It is possible to claim that the EU has been
influential on the development of civil society
in Turkey. It introduced new vocabulary, new
agendas and new discourses into the Turkish civil
society. Some organizations directly associate
the patterns of change with the EU, its bodies,
funds and the European Commission. Some
organizations emphasised other types of
international activities namely intergovernmental
organisations and American organizations. There
is also a significant number of NGOs which are
critical to the EU and do not prefer to have any
ties with the EU. - It is mentioned that Turkeys relation with the
EU has opened up grounds for debate about new,
critical and sometimes delicate issues.
Moreover, a virtual improvement in terms of the
states attitudes towards civil society, has been
created through initiatives provided by the EU.
23Concluding Remarks
-
- There are some remarkable changing trends among
civil society organizations. In the last two
decades they have transformed from mostly being
charity, volunteer-based organizations to
organizations involved advocacy, fund-raising,
networking, professionally conducted joint
activities, and globally defined agenda setting. -
24Concluding Remarks
- They become more and more specialized and
professionalized in their own areas, developed
their cooperative actions at both national and
international level and EU funds have been
influential in this process. - The perceptions of CSOs about EU and
Europeanness also differ according to their field
of activities, financial resources, political
preferences and organizational structure.
Acknowledging the role of the EU in the promotion
of civil society development and increasing
cooperation among the NGOs, they still emphasize
and rely on their own power, dynamism and
struggle for change.
25Links Available in English for Civil Society in
Turkey
- http//www.stgm.org/eng/
- http//en.ucansupurge.org/
- http//www.filmmor.org/
- http//www.kagider.org/
- http//www.dogadernegi.org/english/
- http//www.cekulvakfi.org.tr/
- http//www.wwhr.org/
- http//www.ihd.org.tr/
- http//www.kedv.org.tr/
- http//www.tihv.org.tr/EN/
- http//www.ihop.org.tr/english/
- http//news.kaosgl.com/
26- Thank you very much for your attention