LINGUISTIC POLICY EFFECTS OF THE EU ENLARGEMENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

LINGUISTIC POLICY EFFECTS OF THE EU ENLARGEMENT

Description:

The early start for the first FL. Lowering the starting age for ... Qualitative measures: ELL, CEF, ELP. ELL. small educational institutions, distant regions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: SJ17
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LINGUISTIC POLICY EFFECTS OF THE EU ENLARGEMENT


1
YOUNG LEARNERS
2
Main policy trends
  • Two foreign languages in the school system
  • The early start for the first FL
  • Lowering the starting age for the second FL
  • Promotion of regional and ethnic minority
    languages
  • Ensuring quality of language education

3
Socio-political reasons for the early start
  • A message of educational importance
  • A guarantee of the length of the language course
  • A contribution to the place of language education
    in the school curriculum
  • A response to educational aspiration of parents
  • Pressure of interest groups ( local authorities,
    publishers, teachers)

4
FL in primary education
  • Primary schools in Europe
  • 46,4 English
  • 6,5 German
  • 3,2 French

5
The early start mandatory languages
  • External communication
  • English is mandatory e.g. in Germany, the
    Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark or Latvia)
  • Internal communication
  • French is mandatory in Belgium
  • German is mandatory in Luxembourg
  • Danish is mandatory in Iceland

6
Language education across age groups
  • FL enters the curriculum for children aged 5 to
    10
  • 5 in France
  • 6 in Norway and in Luxembourg
  • 7 in the Czech Republic, in Estonia, in Italy
  • 8 in Greece, in Bulgaria and in Spain
  • 9 in Hungary, in Slovenia, in Lithuania and
    Latvia, Belgium
  • 10 in Estonia, in Poland and in Slovakia, but
    also Belgium, in Denmark, in Portugal, in Iceland

7
Languages in the curriculum
  • Primary education
  • time ranges from 2,4 in Lithuania, Latia and
    Belgium ( fr) to 8-10 in Italy and Estonia
  • Secondary education
  • time ranges from 10 in Poland and in the Czech
    Republic, Slovenia, Norway and Italy to 17-19
    in Slovenia, Latvia, Estonia, Sweden and Iceland

8
Methods and approaches
  • Educational philosophy in line with child
    psychology
  • Oral, interactive, communicative approaches
  • Attractive, motivation building methods
  • Play and game based techniques
  • Supporting child development
  • Catering for individual differences

9
Qualitative measures ELL, CEF, ELP
  • ELL
  • small educational institutions, distant regions
  • collaboration of teachers, parents, institutions
  • promotion of CLIL, ICT, less widely taught FLs
  • CEF
  • upgrading syllabus and materials design
  • assessment
  • ELP
  • learning to learn gtgt self-assessment
  • impact on teachers and publishers

10
Difficulties
  • Lack of continuity after the early start
  • Late introduction of the second FL
  • Uniformity of curriculum scenarios
  • Low budget
  • large classes
  • too many Ls per computer
  • not enough contact hours
  • not enough stays abroad for prospective and
    active teachers

11
Issues to reflect on
  • Efficiency problems is the younger the
    better?
  • Do educational benefits compensate for efficiency
    problems in large groups and limited learning
    time?
  • Acquisition / learning issues
  • Is acquisition possible with limited input?
  • Is it in in fact acquisition or learning?
  • Is interaction possible in large groups of VYLs?
  • Is the early start in kindergarten a valuable
    goal?
  • Is repetition and producing labels worth it?
  • Is production without comprehension worth it?
  • Is there a road from vocabulary to syntax?
  • Is there a road to spontaneous use of a FL?

12
Dilemmas
  • To invest in the quality of one language teaching
    or to introduce a second foreign language
    earlier?
  • To promote early start irrespective of continuity
    assurance or to limit it accordingly?
  • To promote early start irrespective of the
    quantity and quality of input or to limit it
    accordingly?
  • To start in kindergarten or in the primary?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com