Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements

Description:

Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements Performance based design system testing and design procedures simulate closer to the actual loading and climatic conditions – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:342
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: zas8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements


1
Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements
  • Performance based design system
  • testing and design procedures simulate closer to
    the actual loading and climatic conditions
  • performance graded asphalt binders
  • aggregate specifications
  • hot mix asphalt design and analysis system
  • Level 1 material selection and volumetric design
  • Level 2 Level 1 design performance testing
  • Level 3 Level 1 design more performance
    testing
  • Enhanced mix performance
  • Permanent deformation
  • Fatigue Cracking and Low temperature cracking

2
Superpave
  • SHRP established 1987 - 5 yrs.
  • Binder specs in use by 100 of US, Ont., Quebec
    in Canada
  • Level 1 Mix design - partial use
  • Still to come
  • simple performance tests
  • performance prediction models

3
Superpave Mixture Design
  • Key features are laboratory compaction and
    performance testing
  • Laboratory compaction
  • Superpave gyratory compactor (SGC)
  • compacts test specimens to simulate actual
    pavement and loading conditions
  • provides information about the compactability of
    a particular mixture
  • design mixtures that do not exhibit tender mix
    behavior and do not densify to low air voids
    under traffic

4
Superpave Mixture Design
  • Performance testing and performance prediction
    models
  • detailed predictions of actual pavement
    performance in terms of ESALs
  • Superpave Shear tester (been replaced by
    triaxial)
  • Indirect Tensile tester
  • Short term aging protocol
  • performance of HMA immediately after construction
    is influenced by mix properties from hot mixing
    and compaction
  • oven aged mix at 135 C 4 hours to simulate delays
    that can occur during construction

5
Superpave Mixture Design
6
Level 1 Mix Design
  • Volumetric mix design
  • Select asphalt and aggregate materials
  • develop several aggregate trial blends (3) that
    meet Superpave aggregate specs
  • blend asphalt, compact, analyze
  • use best blend with several asphalt contents to
    determine the design asphalt content at 4 air
    voids and compare to other criteria

7
Gyratory Compactor
  • Better simulates field compaction than hammer
  • Compacts specimen but also measures density
    during compaction
  • Measures compactibility so tender mixes are
    identifies
  • Larger size aggregate blends can be used (50 mm
    max size) because of larger mold sizes

8
(No Transcript)
9
  • Amount of compaction depends on traffic and
    climate
  • Ndes is the design number of gyrations used for
    volumetric properties
  • Nmax lt 98, Nini lt 89 of max. density - used to
    indicate compactibility
  • Log Nmax 1.1 Log Ndes
  • Log Nini .45 Log Ndes

10
Trial Blends
  • The available aggregate stockpiles are combined
    in varying percentages, 3 blends are usually
    considered
  • Aggregate properties are determined (either on
    blends or estimated from individual aggregates)
  • Compact each blend and estimate volumetric
    properties

11
Trial Blends
  • For each aggregate trial blend
  • Asphalt binder grade selected
  • Mixing temperature (non modified)
  • viscosity .15 - .19 Pa-s (150 190 mm2/s)
  • Compaction temperature
  • viscosity 0.25 - .31 Pa-s (250 310 mm2/s)
  • Prepare aggregates
  • 2 specimens for each trial blend 2 x 4700g for
    compaction
  • 1 approx. 2000g for max density (uncompacted mix)
  • 1 x 3700 g for moisture sensitivity

12
Trial Blends
  • Heat, mix with asphalt and short term age for 4
    hours at 135C representing possible delays in
    the field
  • Compact specimens for Nmax gyrations, recording
    height

13
Data Analysis
  • Measure density at Nmax, using volume of cylinder
    calculate estimated density at Nmax, Nini, Ndes
  • Errors in estimated densities due to surface
    irregularities of briquette are corrected using
    ratio of measured to estimated density at Nmax
  • Measure Max. theoretical density of the
    uncompacted mix
  • Calculate air voids, VMA, VFA at Ndes

14
Data Analysis
  • When you calculate your air voids you want to be
    at 4..
  • Estimate asphalt content at 4 using
  • Pb,est Pbi - (.4x(4-AV))
  • Calculate corrected values of design VMA and VFA
    for 4 air voids using
  • VMAest VMAinitialC x (4-AV) where C
  • .1 if AV lt 4 or .2 if AV gt 4
  • VFAest ( VMAest- 4) / VMAest

15
Blend Selection
  • Check blend properties against design criteria
  • VMA VFA meets table 6-14,6-15 in text
  • Nini lt 89, Nmax lt 98 of max density
  • passes moisture sensitivity (T283)
  • 80 minimum indirect tensile strength
  • dust content ( passing 0.075 mm sieve divided by
    effective asphalt content) between .6 and 1.2
  • Choose best blend - new samples ( 2 compaction 2
    max density) are made and checked
  • Pb _at_ 4 AV
  • one at 0.5 less
  • 2 more at 0.5 and 1 higher
  • volumetric properties calculated at each a/c
    content
  • a/c content at 4 chosen other criteria checked

16
(No Transcript)
17
Level 2 3 Design
  • Performance tests for permanent deformation
    fatigue cracking and low temperature cracking
  • Superpave Shear Tester (SST) (been replaced by
    triaxial)
  • Indirect Tensile Tester (IDT)
  • Lab testing has not yet been validated with field
    results and is still in experimental stage
  • Current expectations are that Level 2 3 will be
    combined into one and Level 1 will include an
    additional simplified stability test
  • At present research - triaxial testing for
    rutting and fatigue and indirect tension test for
    thermal cracking - presently being evaluated

18
Example - Level 1
  • Interstate 43 in Milwaukie, Wisconsin
  • Nominal max aggregate size 19mm
  • Design ESALs 18,000,000
  • this would actually require a level 3 design

19
  • Select a PG 58-34
  • mix temp 165 to 172C
  • compaction temp 151 to 157C
  • 5 stockpiles - measure bulk and apparent specific
    gravities

20
  • Measure 4 consensus properties
  • can measure blends but will use individual in
    this case to estimate blend properties which has
    an advantage in choosing blends
  • final design blends must meet criteria not
    individual stockpiles

21
  • 3 blends are produced
  • 1 - Intermediate, 2 - Coarse, 3 - Fine

22
  • Blends are checked against gradation requirements
    and for consensus properties - all 3 pass

23
  • Trial asphalt content
  • absorption water calculated from bulk and
    apparent specific gravities of aggregate blends
  • Absorption water 100 (1/Gsb-1/Gsa)
  • Blend 1 .9 water absorption
  • Blend 2 1.0, Blend 3 .9
  • From table 6-12 in text, initial binder content
    is 4.4 for all 3 blends
  • Two samples of each blend are compacted using
    Nini 8, Ndes 109, Nmax 174 (from design
    table table 6-13 text)
  • Maximum and bulk specific gravities (RD) (Gmm,
    Gmb) are measured and compactor data obtained

24
Trial Blend 1
25
Trial Blend 1
26
Trial Blend 2
27
Trial Blend 2
28
Trial Blend 3
29
Trial Blend 3
30
  • The max density at Nini , Ndes, Nmax is
    calculated from an average of the two samples of
    each blend
  • Calculated air voids and VMA at Ndes
  • AV 100 - Gmm
  • 1 100-96.2 3.8, 2 4.3, 34.8
  • VMA 100 - (Gmm x Gmm x (1 - Pbi))/Gsb
  • 1 100-(96.2x2.563x.956)/2.699 12.7
  • 2 13.0
  • 3 13.5

31
  • Estimate properties _at_ 4 air voids
  • Pb,est Pbi - (.4 x(4-AV))
  • 1 4.4-(.4x(4-3.8)) 4.3
  • 2 4.5
  • 3 4.7
  • VMAest VMAinitial C x (4 - AV)
  • 1 12.7 (.1 x (4.0 - 3.8)) 12.7
  • 2 13.0 (.2 x (4.0 - 4.3)) 13.0
  • 3 13.5 (.2 x (4.0 - 4.8)) 13.4
  • VFAest 100x (VMAest - 4)/VMAest
  • 1 100 x (12.7 - 4.0)/12.7 68.5
  • 2 69.2
  • 3 70.1

32
  • Estimate properties at 4 Air Voids
  • Gmm,est _at_ Nini Gmm,trial - (4-Av,trial)
  • 1 87.1-(4-3.8) 86.9
  • 2 85.9
  • 3 87.1
  • Similarly for Nmax
  • 1 97.4
  • 2 97.7
  • 3 97.3
  • Results for 4 air voids for 3 blends

33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
  • Dust ration P0.75/Pbe,est
  • 1 3.1/3.6 .86
  • 2 2.9/3.7 .78
  • 3 3.5/4.0 .88
  • All pass with values between .6 and 1.2
  • Blend 1 fails VMA, blend 2 just meets VMA,
    therefore select blend 3
  • If no blends were acceptable start over with new
    stockpile ratios
  • Evaluate blend 3 as before by mixing 2 specimens
    with 4.2, 4.7, 5.2 and 5.7 AC contents
  • Note this time aggregate consensus properties
    must be measured on the blends and not calculated
    from stockpile values

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
Calculating mix volumetric properties (not
estimating) for the final blend use
  • Calculated air voids, VMA, VFA at NdesAV 100
    - GmmVMA 100 - (Gmm x Gmm x (1 -
    Pbi))/GsbVFA 100 x ((VMA - AV)/VMA)

43
(No Transcript)
44
  • Blend is tested for moisture sensitivity and has
    tensile strength ratio of 82.6 which exceed the
    80 minimum requirement
  • This blend meets all required design criteria and
    is approved for use!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com