Evaluating the Effect of Coarse Rubber Particles on Asphalt Concrete Mixtures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating the Effect of Coarse Rubber Particles on Asphalt Concrete Mixtures

Description:

Specimen Fabrication. Specimen Testing. Fine-Tune Rubber Substitution. Gradation Manipulation ... Specimen Fabrication. Specimen Fabrication. Gyratory ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: mill1150
Learn more at: https://users.rowan.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating the Effect of Coarse Rubber Particles on Asphalt Concrete Mixtures


1
Evaluating the Effect of Coarse Rubber Particles
on Asphalt Concrete Mixtures
  • James K. Laicovsky
  • Laura C. Miller
  • Amanda R. Zimmerman

The 18th International Conference on Solid Waste
Technology and Management Philadelphia, PA
March 25, 2003
2
Outline of Presentation
  • The Tire Problem
  • Superpave
  • Project Scope
  • Results

3
Waste Tires
Total 300 Million Tires 2.5 Million Tons
4
Solid Waste in the U.S.
5
(No Transcript)
6
Solution
7
Recent Projects
Northeast
Washington
85 of scrap tires are located in -- Connecticut,
New York, Pennsylvania , Ohio, Michigan,
Colorado, Virginia, Texas, and Alabama.
Tennessee
Arizona
Texas
8
Superpave
  • SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments
  • Strategic Highway Research Program
  • New techniques to specify, test, and design

9
Project Scope
  • Rubber Analysis
  • Gradation Manipulation
  • Rubber Substitution
  • Specimen Fabrication
  • Specimen Testing
  • Fine-Tune Rubber Substitution

10
Gradation Manipulation
Desired Superpave Gradation Curve
Percent Passing
Sieve Size.45
11
Rubber Analysis
¾ Rubber Particles
4 Rubber Particles
12 Rubber Particles
12
Rubber Substitution
  • Substituted Rubber into Original Superpave
    Gradation
  • 0.5 - 5.0

Rubber Particles
13
Specimen Fabrication

14
Specimen Fabrication
15
GC Data
Compaction Height, cm
Gyration, N
16
GC Data Analysis
Area ½(H1-H2)(log100-log1)
H1
Slope k
k
Air voids at 100 gyrations Lower the number,
softer mix
1
H2
0
100
Log (Number of Gyrations)
17
GC Data Plot
Compaction Height, cm
Log (Number of gyrations), N
18
Results
Area Under k Curve vs. Rubber Substitution
Area Under k Curve
Rubber Substitution,
19
Analysis
  • 4 rubber substitution uses
  • 60 tons of GTR 7,600 tires/lane mile
  • Rubber cost 10,000/lane mile

20
Analysis
  • 4 rubber substitution reduces
  • 780 tons of aggregates
  • 156,000 savings/lane mile

Savings of 146,000/lane mile
21
Conclusions
  • Improved rutting performance.
  • Potentially useful with NJ aggregates.
  • Continued investigation to determine optimal
    substitution percentage.

22
Web Site
http//engineering.rowan.edu/mill2633/rowan_rubbe
r.htm
23
QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com