Cournot Duopoly and Bertrand Duopoly - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Cournot Duopoly and Bertrand Duopoly

Description:

Cournot Duopoly. Two firms, 1 and 2, produce quantities q1 and q2 of a homogenous good ... Bertrand Duopoly. Same model as Cournot, but strategies are prices pi [0, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1860
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: sh394
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cournot Duopoly and Bertrand Duopoly


1
Cournot Duopoly(and Bertrand Duopoly)
  • Guilherme Carmona
  • Winter 2007

2
History
  • Antoine Augustin Cournot
  • 1838 Recherches sur les principes mathématiques
    de la théorie des richesses
  • First formal model of competition between few
    firms
  • Assumption firms choose quantity
  • Cournot equilibrium is NE of his game!

3
A bit more history
  • Bertrand (1883) criticized model
  • Firms set prices!
  • Controversy not yet finished
  • Both models used in practice!
  • Cournot model used more because better behaved

4
Cournot Duopoly
  • Two firms, 1 and 2, produce quantities q1 and q2
    of a homogenous good
  • Production is simultaneous, and price is
    determined later when both firms throw their
    production on the market
  • Cost functions C1 and C2
  • Demand function Q D(p)Inverse demand function
    p P(Q) D-1(Q)

5
As a game
  • Description in normal form
  • Players N 1,2
  • Strategies qi ? Si 0,K , K gt 0
  • Payoffs pi(qi,qj) P(qiqj)qi Ci(qi)
  • Dutta pi(qi,qj) (a b(qiqj) c)qi
  • Linear demand and cost

6
Best Responses or Reaction Functions
  • Observation pi(qi,qj) pi(qi,qj) ?qi ? Si
    if and only if qi ? argmaxqi pi(qi,qj)
  • Define best response by ri(qj) argmaxqi
    pi(qi,qj) ?qj ? Sj(assuming a unique maximizer
    to simplify things)

7
BR(2)
  • Assume that p is twice continuously
    differentiable
  • Necessary first-order condition?pi(ri(qj),qj)/?q
    i 0 ?qj ? Sj
  • Second-order condition ?2pi(ri(qj),qj)/?qi2 lt 0
    ?qj ? Sj
  • Best response in linear modelri(qj) (a c)/2b
    qj/2

8
General method
  • Nash equilibrium q1 r1(q2)
    q2 r2(q1)gt intersection of best responses
  • With q (q1, q2) and r (r1, r2), this is
    fixed point q r(q)
  • Allows the use of strong mathematical tools

9
Nash equilibrium
  • Linear model solve q1 (a-c)/2b q2/2
    q2 (a-c)/2b q1/2
  • Or make use of symmetry q (a-c)/2b
    q/2
  • In both cases q (a-c)/3b
  • Between monopoly and competitive outcome

10
More firms
  • Assume n symmetric firms
  • Let Q q1 qn, Q-i Q - qi
  • Profits are pi(qi,Q-i) P(qiQ-i)qi
    C(qi)
  • FOC Pqi P C 0
  • Symmetric NE (P-C)/P 1/ne
  • Lerner index decreases in n with more firms
    prices are lower!

11
More firms (2)
  • Symmetric equilibrium in linear model Q-i
    (n-1)qiand q (a-c)/2b (n-1)q/2
  • Equilibrium valuesq (a-c)/b(n1), Q
    n(a-c)/b(n1)P (anc)/(n1), p
    (a-c)2/b(n1)2
  • For n -gt 8, approaches competitive
    outcome

12
Bertrand Duopoly
  • Same model as Cournot, but strategies are prices
    pi ?0,8)
  • Homogeneous goods consumers buy at firm with
    lowest price
  • Caution many models of price competition used in
    practice assume differentiated goods in order to
    avoid discontinuous payoffs (as we will see in a
    moment). Are often also called Bertrand
    competition, where price competition with
    differentiated goods would be more precise.

13
Bertrand Sharing rule and profits
  • Problem need to decide what happens at equal
    price sharing rule (an additional assumption)
  • Standard each gets half of the customers
  • Profits, assuming linear cost (pi c)D(pi)
    if pi lt pj p (pi c)D(pi)/2 if pi
    pj 0 if pi gt pj

14
BertrandNash equilibrium
  • Problem profits are discontinuous! (and exactly
    where it counts)
  • No best response exists!
  • Can NE exist?
  • Yes, because definition has nothing to do with
    BRs

15
BertrandNash equilibrium (2)
  • Show
  • (c,c) is a NE by checking that nobody will
    deviate
  • No other price pair is NE
  • Strategy p c is weakly dominated!
  • Famous Bertrand paradox zero profits
  • Limit of discrete case with ever smaller
    smallest coin

16
Readings and exercises
  • Readings ch. 8, 28
  • Exercises
  • PS 1 6, 7, 12
  • Dutta 7.6-7.8, 7.12, 7.13, 7.15
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com