Biodiversity%20 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Biodiversity%20

Description:

Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment Definitions Components of Biodiversity The term biodiversity often is used incorrectly or incompletely – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:308
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: RonK105
Learn more at: http://home.sandiego.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biodiversity%20


1
  • Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment
  • Definitions
  • Components of Biodiversity
  • The term biodiversity often is used incorrectly
    or incompletely
  • Not synonymous with species diversity
  • Encompasses three measures
  • Species Diversity
  • Species richness Total number of species
  • Often cited incorrectly as biodiversity
  • Fairly simple to estimate from rarefaction curves
  • Evenness Proportions of species in a community
  • More difficult to determine (requires more
    complete survey)
  • Genetic Diversity Variety of genotypes
  • Ecosystem Diversity Variety of habitat types

2
(No Transcript)
3
  • Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment
  • Definitions
  • Components of Biodiversity
  • The term biodiversity often is used incorrectly
    or incompletely
  • Not synonymous with species diversity
  • Encompasses three measures
  • Species Diversity
  • Species richness Total number of species
  • Often cited incorrectly as biodiversity
  • Fairly simple to estimate from rarefaction curves
  • Evenness Proportions of species in a community
  • More difficult to determine (requires more
    complete survey)
  • Genetic Diversity Variety of genotypes
  • Keystone Species

4
  • Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment
  • Estimates of Biodiversity
  • Described species 1.8 million
  • Insects gt 1,000,000 species
  • Plants gt 290,000 species
  • Probably an underestimate
  • Only 5000 species of bacteria
  • Less conspicuous species studied less often
  • Estimates range from 5 30 million
  • Around 300 new species described each day
  • Average estimate 17.5 million
  • Splitting of taxa more common than lumping
  • Tendency to increase number of described species
  • Cryptic species

5
  • Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment
  • Estimates of Extinction Rates
  • Geological history
  • Periods of extinction followed by periods of
    rapid speciation (every 26 million years)
  • How do we estimate rates of extinction??
  • Problems
  • Difficult to know when a species is extinct
  • Ex Coelacanth, ivory billed woodpecker, giant
    lemur
  • Species distributed unevenly (patchy
    distribution)
  • Species affected unevenly by habitat loss
  • Extinctions may not happen immediately
  • Short-lived species show effects rapidly
  • Long-lived species may appear to be unaffected
    for long periods of time
  • Biologically extinct Populations not
    self-sustaining
  • Living dead - Janzen
  • Uncertainty about number of species in an area
  • Wilson No precise estimate can be made of the
    numbers of species being extinguished in the rain
    forests or in other major habitats, for the
    simple reason that we do not know the numbers of
    species originally present

6
  • Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment
  • Estimates of Extinction Rates
  • Estimation Methods
  • Area-species relationship (MacArthur Wilson)
  • Estimate biodiversity for a small area
  • Extrapolate estimate to area of habitat
  • Species Area0.25 (0.15-0.35)
  • Increase area 10X ? Increase species 2X
  • Estimate rate at which ecosystem area is being
    reduced
  • Calculate extinction rate based on predicted
    reduction in species richness from reduction in
    habitat area
  • Current estimate 17,500 species year-1
  • 1 out of every 1000 species on Earth each year
  • Background rate from fossil record
  • 1 out of every 1-10 million species on Earth each
    year

7
(No Transcript)
8
  • Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment
  • Estimates of Extinction Rates
  • Estimation Methods
  • Area-species relationship (MacArthur Wilson)
  • Estimate biodiversity for a small area
  • Extrapolate estimate to area of habitat
  • Species Area0.25 (0.15-0.35)
  • Increase area 10X ? Increase species 2X
  • Estimate rate at which ecosystem area is being
    reduced
  • Calculate extinction rate based on predicted
    reduction in species richness from reduction in
    habitat area
  • Current estimates 17,500 species year-1
  • 1 out of every 1000 species on Earth each year
  • Myers 40,000 year-1
  • Lomborg 1033 documented from 1600 1998
  • The Skeptical Environmentalist
  • Background rate from fossil record
  • 1 out of every 1-10 million species year-1

9
  • Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment
  • Estimates of Extinction Rates
  • Point Estimates may be unreliable and thus
    invalid
  • No action should be taken until biodiversity loss
    is demonstrated and shown to be harmful
  • Counterpoint Wilson Projections using
    area-species relationships in tropical settings
    (where most of biodiversity loss currently is
    happening) are conservative
  • Tropical species have localized distributions
    that make them especially vulnerable to habitat
    loss
  • Damaging loss of genetic diversity may occur,
    even if outright extinction of a species doesnt
    happen

10
  • Biodiversity Definitions and Assessment
  • Biodiversity Hotspots
  • Myers Up to 20 of the worlds plant species
    and more than 20 of the animal species are
    confined to 0.5 of the land surface
  • Biodiversity Hotspot Area with high degree of
  • Biodiversity
  • Endemism
  • Risk of habitat degradation/loss
  • Concept originally intended for tropical and
    subtropical areas
  • Endemism less prevalent in temperate and polar
    regions

11
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Nutrient Availability
  • Oligotrophic
  • Dominated by a few species able to survive on
    limited nutrients
  • Low diversity, Low biomass
  • Mesotrophic
  • Support greater numbers of species
  • Rapid colonizers held in check by nutrient
    limitation
  • Less aggressive species capable of surviving
  • High diversity, Medium biomass
  • Eutrophic
  • Dominated by a few species able to grow and/or
    colonize rapidly with abundant nutrients
  • Low diversity, High biomass

12
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Selective Colonization/Mortality
  • Colonization
  • Excellent colonizers (r-selected) may dominate
    newly available habitats
  • Mortality
  • Predation
  • Ex Birds with colorful plumage
  • Ex Sea urchins (sushi)
  • Species-specific diseases/pests
  • Ex Dutch elm disease
  • Ex Western bark beetles

13
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Habitat Disturbance
  • Non-selective habitat disturbance has potential
    to increase diversity
  • Prevents competitive exclusion
  • Intermediate disturbance ? Maximum diversity

14
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Habitat Disturbance
  • Fire and fire-dependent species
  • Ex Peters Mountain Mallow (Iliamna corei)
  • Discovered in 1927 (50 plants)
  • Endemic to meadow in western Virginia
  • 1986 - Three plants remaining
  • Not setting seed
  • Listed as endangered
  • Research on seeds indicated importance of fire
  • Cracks hard seed coat, aiding germination
  • Removes competing vegetation
  • Had been suppressed in the area
  • Controlled burns in 1992 and 1993 led to
    appearance of 500 seedlings

15
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Habitat Fragmentation/Destruction
  • Most significant factor causing species loss
  • Smaller habitats support fewer species and
    smaller populations than large habitats
  • Population sizes tend to fluctuate more in
    smaller habitats than large habitats
  • Reduced population ? Lower genetic diversity
  • Behavior of territorial species changes in
    fragments, esp. when territory size fragment
    size
  • Fragments may not support self-sustaining
    populations (rely on immigration from outside)

16
  • Mount Hood National Forest, Oregon
  • Patches due to timber removal

17
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Habitat Fragmentation/Destruction
  • Most significant factor causing species loss
  • Smaller habitats support fewer species and
    smaller populations than large habitats
  • Population sizes tend to fluctuate more in
    smaller habitats than large habitats
  • Reduced population ? Lower genetic diversity
  • Behavior of territorial species changes in
    fragments, esp. when territory size fragment
    size
  • Fragments may not support self-sustaining
    populations (rely on immigration from outside)

18
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Habitat Fragmentation/Destruction
  • Fragmentation increases edge effects
  • Positive effects
  • Increased light to plant species at edges
  • Negative effects
  • Increased predation by animals foraging at
    habitat edge
  • Ex Nesting success among migratory birds in
    Midwestern forests lower in fragments due to
    increased nest predation and parasitism by
    cowbirds

19
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Exotic Species
  • Species invasions may profoundly affect
    ecosystems
  • Detrimental exotic species usually are
  • Superior competitors
  • Ex Argentine ants, starlings, zebra mussels
  • Effective predators
  • Ex Nile perch, mongeese

20
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Exotic Species
  • Zebra mussel
  • Competitor in Great Lakes and elsewhere
  • Transported from Europe in ballast water
  • Fouling organism
  • Restricts movement of water through intake pipes
  • Colonizes boat hulls, pier pilings, buoys, etc.
  • Fouls other organisms (clams, mussels)
  • Filter feeder removes larvae and particulate
    material
  • Outcompetes native shellfish species for food and
    space
  • Removes larvae from water

21
(No Transcript)
22
  • Biodiversity Factors
  • Exotic Species
  • Mongoose
  • Predator in Hawaii
  • Introduced in 1883 to combat rat population
  • Prey on native birds
  • Lionfish
  • Venomous predator
  • Introduced in Caribbean/W Atlantic ca. early/mid
    1990s
  • Preys on 65 spp. of fishes
  • No natural predators

23
Nile perch Lake Victoria
Brown tree snake - Guam
Argentine ants - California
Caulerpa taxifolia - California
24
  • Biodiversity Value
  • Value to Humans
  • Economic
  • Ex Lomborg 3-33 trillion annually
  • Biodiversity loss could lead to removal of
    species that benefit humans but arent currently
    known to do so
  • Ex Chapin et al. suggest increased frequency of
    Lyme disease in 20th century may have been
    related to increase in abundance of tick-bearing
    mice (once controlled by food competition with
    passenger pigeons)
  • Species extinction reduces potential pool of
    species containing chemical compounds with
    pharmaceutical or industrial applications
  • Counter Many pharmaceutical companies now use
    directed design to search for new drugs

25
  • Biodiversity Value
  • Value to Humans
  • Problem Benefits may not be obvious
  • Difficult to convince people that its important
    to preserve something with no immediately
    apparent intrinsic value to them (charisma?)
  • Ex Economic value of viral resistance added to
    commercial strains of perennial corn through
    hybridization with teosinte (Mexican wild grass)
    is 230-300 million
  • Ex Weedy tomatoes from Peru
  • Discovered in 1962 during search for potatoes
  • Seeds sent to researcher at UC Davis who used
    plants to breed with other tomatoes
  • In 1980 after nearly 10 generations of crossing
    and backcrossing, new strains were produced with
    larger fruit, improved pigmentation and increased
    concentrations of sugars and soluble solids

26
  • Biodiversity Value
  • Ecosystem Value
  • Biodiversity can have large effects on ecosystem
    stability and productivity
  • Benefits of biodiversity
  • Productivity
  • Halving species richness reduces productivity by
    10-20 (Tilman)
  • Average plot with one plant species is less than
    half as productive as a plot with 24-32 species
  • Question Can these results be extrapolated to
    other systems and time/space scales?
  • Nutrient retention
  • Loss of nutrients through leaching is reduced
    when diversity is high
  • Caveat Studies to date have focused on low
    diversity communities (Why?) can those results
    be generalized?

27
  • Biodiversity Value
  • Ecosystem Value
  • Benefits of biodiversity
  • Ecosystem stability
  • Mechanism
  • Multiple species within a trophic level compete
    for resources
  • If abundance of one species declines due to
    perturbation, competing species may increase in
    abundance
  • Individual species abundances may vary, but
    community as a whole is more stable with more
    species
  • Consequences
  • High diversity doesnt guarantee that individual
    populations wont fluctuate
  • Ex Higher diversity (unfertilized) plots of
    native plant species maintained more biomass
    during drought than lower diversity (fertilized)
    plots
  • High diversity may confer greater resistance to
    pests and diseases
  • Ex Higher diversity plots of native plant
    species had greater resistance to fungal
    diseases, reduced predation by herbivorous
    insects and reduced invasion by weeds

28
  • Biodiversity Value
  • Ecosystem Value
  • Considerations
  • Species richness vs. Species evenness
  • Simple species richness may be deceptive as an
    indicator of biodiversity and ecosystem stability
  • Evenness usually responds more rapidly to
    perturbation than richness and may have important
    ecosystem consequences
  • Richness is typical focus of studies and policy
    decisions
  • Importance of individual species
  • Charismatic megafauna What about non-charismatic
    species?
  • Different species affect ecosystems in different
    ways (keystone species vs. non-keystone species)
  • Ex Sea otters/Sea urchins/Kelp forests in
    eastern Pacific Ocean
  • Question How many species are required to
    maintain normal ecosystem function and
    stability?
  • No magic number
  • Losing one ant species in a tropical forest may
    have less immediate impact than losing one
    species of fungus that is crucial to nutrient
    cycling in the soil

29
  • Biodiversity Management
  • Strategies outlined in Convention on Biological
    Diversity
  • Developed between 1988 and 1992
  • Opened for ratification at UN Conference on
    Environment and Development (Rio Earth Summit)
  • Ratified by 168 nations went into force in Dec
    1992
  • Objectives the conservation of biological
    diversity, the sustainable use of its components
    and the fair and equitable sharing of the
    benefits arising out of the utilization of
    genetic resources
  • Articles 8-9 specify a combination of in situ and
    ex situ conservation measures
  • Primary use of in situ conservation
  • Use of ex situ measures as a complement
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com