Folie 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Folie 1

Description:

Title: Folie 1 Author: tt34 Last modified by: tt34 Created Date: 9/27/2006 12:15:16 PM Document presentation format: Bildschirmpr sentation Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: tt34
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Folie 1


1
Concentrating Solar Powerfor Sea Water
Desalination
Franz Trieb German Aerospace Center
(DLR) 12.11.2007
2
Partners
German Aerospace Center (Germany) Dr. Franz
Trieb, Dipl. Geo. Julia Gehrung, Dr. Peter
Viebahn, Dr. Christoph Schillings, Dipl. Phys.
Carsten Hoyer National Energy Research Center
(Jordan) Eng. Malek Kabariti, Waled Shahin, Ammar
Al-Taher University of Aden, (Yemen) Prof. Dr.
Hussein Altowaie University of Sanaa, (Yemen)
Prof. Dr. Towfik Sufian University of Bahrain,
(Bahrain) Prof. Dr. Waheeb Alnaser Prof. Dr.
Abdelaziz Bennouna, formerly at CNR
(Morocco) Intern. Forschungszentrum für
Erneuerbare Energien e.V. (Germany) Dr. Nasir
El-Bassam Kernenergien The Solar Power Company
(Germany) Dipl.-Ing. Jürgen Kern Nokraschy
Engineering GmbH (Germany) Dr.-Ing. Hani
El-Nokraschy Deutsche Gesellschaft Club of Rome
(Germany) Dr. Gerhard Knies, Dr. Uwe Möller House
of Water and Environment (Palestine) Dr. Amjad
Aliewi, Hafez Shaheen Center for Solar Energy
Studies (Libya) Dr. Ibrahim Elhasairi Centre de
Developpement des Energies Renouvelables
(Morocco) Mme. Amal Haddouche (Director
General) University of Bremen (Germany) Dr. Heike
Glade
3
Task Assessment of the Potential of
Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) for Seawater
Desalination for the Urban Centres in 20
Countries of the Middle East and North Africa.
4
Work Packages 1. Technologies (combination of
CSP and desalting technologies) 2. Water
Resources and Solar Energy Resources 3. Demand
Side Scenario 4. Market Potential 2000-2050
5. Socio-Economic Impacts 6. Environmental
Impacts 7. Literature ? Final Report a la
MED-CSP and TRANS-CSP by end 2007
5
WP 1 Technologies Reference Plant Definition
MED Multi-Effect-Distillation RO Reverse
Osmosis Membrane Desalination
6
WP 1 Technologies Conclusions
  • Base load capability makes CSP best suited
    renewable source for large scale
    desalination
  • MSF is the less efficient desalination
    technology with high energy demand
  • CSP/MED and CSP/RO have similar technical and
    economic performance, no preference for
    either one can be seen without detailed site
    assessment
  • Linear Fresnel collector fields are particularly
    well suited for seawater desalination
  • Present cost of CSP desalination between 1 - 2
    /m³
  • Medium term cost of 0.2 - 0.3 /m³ is achievable
    in combination with power generation and
    using solar energy storage
  • ? CSP technology is ready for the seawater
    desalination market

7
WP 2 Resources Exploitable Natural Water
8
WP 2 Resources Conclusions
  • Water poverty (lt 1000 m³(cap/y) in all except 4
    MENA countries
  • Exploitable natural water 328 Bm³/y
  • Plenty fossil groundwater but only small part
    exploitable
  • Huge solar energy resource available in all MENA
    countries
  • ? CSP-Potential for non-conventional water from
    seawater desalination available

9
WP 3 Freshwater Demand Water Demand Prospects by
Country
10
WP 3 Freshwater Demand Conclusions
  • MENA population will double by 2050
  • MENA economies will approximate European level
    by 2050
  • Water demand would grow from 270 Bm³/y in 2000
    to 460 Bm³/y in 2050
  • Water deficit would increase from 50 Bm³/y in
    2000 to 150 Bm³/y in 2050
  • Over-use of groundwater is already above 45
    Bm³/y
  • Extreme efficiency could limit deficit to 100
    Bm³/y
  • ? Efficiency and new sources will be required to
    cover water deficits

11
WP 4 CSP Markets Middle East North Africa
12
WP 4 CSP Markets Conclusions
  • Sustainable supply must be initiated immediately
    to avoid groundwater collapse
  • Increase efficiency of water production,
    distribution, end-use and management
  • Increase re-use of waste water
  • Start introduction and dissemination of
    CSP-desalination plants
  • Over-use of groundwater will increase still from
    45 Bm³/y to 70 Bm³/y in 2020
  • Conventional desalination will grow by a factor
    of 5
  • ? All measures should be taken to avoid
    groundwater collapse, but CSP is the key to
    sustainability

13
WP 5 Socio-Economic Impacts CSP Learning Curves
_at_ 5 ct/kWh electricity cost
14
WP 5 Socio-Economic Impacts Conclusions
  • Cost perspective of CSP desalination is
    affordable (lt 0.4 /m³), while that of
    conventional desalination is not
  • Efficiency enhancement and desalination are less
    expensive than not acting
  • Solar water can avoid dependency on virtual
    water
  • CSP desalination can create arable land for
    rural and urban development
  • ? CSP desalination is a totally over-looked
    solution to the MENA water crisis

15
WP 6 Environmental Impacts Impact on Global
Warming
16
WP 6 Environmental Impacts Conclusions
  • Large scale conventional seawater desalination
    would create significant environmental
    impacts
  • CSP can reduce energy related emissions to few
    percent
  • Beachwell or horizontal drain intake and
    nano-filtration can reduce additives
  • Horizontal drain intake can reduce impingement
    and entrainment and horizontal drain
    discharge can avoid concentration of heat and
    salt
  • ? Advanced CSP seawater desalination can be
    compatible with the environment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com