Learning from ICT Test Bed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Learning from ICT Test Bed

Description:

Establish how ICT enables transformational change and raises standards. Gather evidence on how ICT brings about improvements in educational endeavour ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2738
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: gilt2
Category:
Tags: ict | bed | endeavour | learning | test

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Learning from ICT Test Bed


1
Learning from ICT Test Bed
  • Claire Gill
  • Head of Institutional Support Servicesclaire.gill
    _at_becta.org.uk

2
3 clusters 3 LEAs, 28 schools 3 colleges
Collaborationsupport
Funding
Implementationsupport
Learning teaching advice guidance
Leadership, workforceinstitutional advice
guidance
Evaluation Support
3
Project aims
  • Establish how ICT enables transformational change
    and raises standards
  • Gather evidence on how ICT brings about
    improvements in educational endeavour
  • Disseminate the lessons learnt from the project
  • Institutional objectives
  • Institutional improvement and raising standards
  • Improved leadership and management
  • More effective and efficient use of teacher time
  • Cluster objectives
  • Collaboration and some aspects of federation
  • Improved home and community links

4
Test Bed clusters
  • Barking and Dagenham LEA
  • Three comprehensive schools Barking Abbey,
    Eastbury and Warren with a selection (6) of
    their feeder junior and Infant schools
  • Durham LEA
  • Parkside Comprehensive, Willington its main (9)
    feeder primary schools and a special school which
    supports the cluster
  • Sandwell LEA
  • Shireland Language College and its main (7)
    feeder primary schools (part of the Smethwick
    Learning Network) plus the pupil referral unit
  • Plus one FE college in each cluster

5
The timescale and funding
  • Four year project to August 2006
  • Final evaluation report January 2007
  • with possible extension for follow-up
  • Started work in June 2002
  • LEAs selected in August, Schools Sept 02
  • School/cluster planning started October
  • Formal launch November 2002
  • Plans approved end March 03
  • Funding
  • Year 1 20 million
  • Years 2-4 7m, 4m, 3m (estimated)

6
Learning from ICT Test Bed
  • Guy Underwood Matt Goodyear
  • London Borough of
  • Barking Dagenham

7
Reasons
  • Raise standards
  • Engage learners
  • Enrich the learning experience
  • Empower teachers
  • Disseminate best practice

8
Approaches
  • Driven by teaching learning
  • Collaboration across institutions
  • Developed partnerships
  • Clear ownership vision

9
Impacts
  • Embedded use of technologies
  • Enhanced the way we teach
  • Increased pupil interaction
  • Improved communication
  • Created a sustained buzz

10
Interactive Technologies
  • Technology for teaching learning
  • Complete solution
  • Easy to use
  • Builds on strengths
  • Encourages collaboration

11
Digital Imaging
  • Powerful self assessment tool
  • Inclusive tool for expression
  • Flexible range of outputs
  • Facilitates collaboration

12
Visioning
  • What will future state look like?
  • Time to think, discuss communicate
  • Ownership to achieve vision
  • Structured toolset

13
Leadership management
  • Empowers leadership at all levels
  • Provides tools resources
  • Enables the sharing of best practice
  • Power of network applications
  • Improved communication

14
Closing thoughts
  • Have a clear and communicated vision
  • Keep teaching learning at the core
  • Develop strong and sustainable partnerships
  • Build on existing strengths
  • Consider total cost of implementing ICT

15
Preliminary Outcomes of the Test Bed Evaluation
  • Bridget Somekh
  • Manchester Metropolitan University
  • Jean Underwood
  • Nottingham Trent University

16
Purpose of the Evaluation
  • The external evaluation is assessing whether, to
    what extent and how the objectives of the Test
    Bed policy have been met, identifying challenges
    encountered and lessons learnt.
  • The internal evaluation, in partnership with
    project participants, is using an action research
    approach to support the development of good
    practice and its dissemination.

17
Quantitative approaches
  • Benchmarking Test Bed schools/colleges against 4
    comparators no findings till Yr 2
  • Maturity modelling. Production of framework on
    six dimensions for assessing school / college
    maturity. No findings till Yr 2
  • Base-line data giving staff and student
    attitudes, self-assessments and perceptions in
    2002-03 (data set completed by Sept 03)

18
Findings from Base-line Data
  • The majority of staff and students have positive
    attitudes to the use of ICT and already use it.
  • There is a clear relationship between level and
    amount of training and diversity level of ICT
    use.
  • KS1/KS2 children showed very positive attitudes
    to using ICT at home and at school.Secondary
    pupils reported extensive experience of using ICT
    and were confident about teaching othersFE
    students were more cautious about their ICT
    skills.

19
Progress in Action Research
  • Seventy staff (teachers, managers, support staff)
    have embarked on action research studies.
  • Five reports are complete and will shortly be
    published on the TB Evaluation pages in the Becta
    research site.
  • Some staff of schools/colleges are presenting
    their action research at the ITTE Conference in
    July and the Collaborative Action Research
    Conference in November.
  • Those who have completed action research studies
    are taking on the role of Research Leaders.

20
The external qualitative evaluation
  • Preliminary positive outcomes
  • Use of ICT has increased hugely across all
    participating schools and participating
    courses/sectors of the FE colleges.
  • Very substantial use of interactive white boards
    and, in Barking and Dagenham, large screens,
    visualisers and interactive tablets.
  • Most use of ICT for teaching and learning is to
    support and enhance existing practice.
  • Some use is radical and innovatory e.g. changing
    the quality, depth and relevance of pupils
    learning.

21
  • Challenges of Test Bed implementation
  • Scale and complexity of roll-out substantial
    delay till equipment in place (inevitable with
    large ICT initiatives). Way forward plan
    future projects to take this into account.
  • The vision challenge even with excellent advice
    its hard to plan because you need a mental
    model of the possibilities.Way forward visits
    to other schools to see what they have done.
  • The installation challenge two phases of
    funding security contractors, electricians,
    builders Way forward use the two phases of
    funding to try out new equipment and modify as
    needed for phase two.

22
  • Challenges of Test Bed implementation (2)
  • The technical support challenge technical
    support is essential in ICT-rich institutions.
    Test Bed provided additional support but also
    generated greatly increased need. Way forward -
    an onsite technician (who can troubleshoot
    immediately) transforms ICT use in primary
    schools.Way forward - technicians could begin to
    provide more support for learners in classrooms,
    once maintaining functionality is less of a
    problem.
  • The training challengeWay forward match
    training to need, synchronise with arrival of
    equipment, include follow-up and peer support

23
  • Challenges of Test Bed implementation (3)
  • The challenge of embedding ICT in teaching and
    learning currently almost all use of ICT for
    teaching curriculum (i.e. not for teaching ICT)
    is limited to use of IWB and Screens/
    Visualisers/ Tablets. Use of ICT by pupils in
    school is very limited by comparison with their
    use at home.Way forward need for
    experimentation, monitoring, refinement this is
    the main focus of TB action research
  • The challenge of leadership and management
  • The challenge of cluster collaboration
  • The challenge of home and community links

24
  • Congratulations to the Heads/Principals of Test
    Bed Schools and Colleges on the considerable
    success achieved in the initial stages of
    planning, procurement, installation of equipment,
    experimentation with use, staff training . and
    all the rest
  • And to the Becta support team and LEA Test Bed
    managers

25
Learning from ICT Test Bed
  • Tim Rudd
  • Evidence and Evaluation TeamTimothy.Rudd_at_becta.or
    g.uk
  • www.becta.org.uk/research

26
  • Establish how ICT enables transformational change
    and raises standards
  • Impact on learning and teaching in institutions
    is already visible
  • Institutions experiencing real change (supported
    NRT)
  • New ways of working emerging novel ICT
    solutions being tried
  • Visual kinaesthetic learning overcoming
    barriers
  • Teachers, Leaders, and support staff gaining new
    skills
  • Perceptual changes ICT vision emerging

27
Project aims
  • Institutional improvement and raising standards
  • Improved leadership and management
  • Change management approaches making a difference
  • More effective and efficient use of teacher time
  • LSPs ICT use and support
  • Perennial difficulties of measuring impact of ICT
    on standards

28
  • Collaboration and some aspects of federation
  • Improved home and community links
  • Home-School-Community Links are a key development
  • Improved communication between parents and
    schools
  • Greater parental and community involvement and
    support for schools
  • Area for further development

29
  • Gather evidence on how ICT brings about
    improvements in educational endeavour
  • Evaluation ongoing quantitative and qualitative
    study until 2006
  • Maturity Model, new tool for data collection
    analysis, developed
  • Lessons all schools and colleges can learn from
  • Moving from implementation to embedding
  • Institutions now finalising plans for 2004/05
    activity
  • Today project as a whole enters second stage-
    greater external dissemination and profile raising

30
  • Disseminate the lessons learnt from the project
  • Dissemination starting
  • Research Conference(s)
  • First project newsletter out
  • Schools and colleges presenting with and without
    us at non Becta events
  • First Year evaluation findings being disseminated
    and second year findings emerging
  • Questions and lessons learned so far being asked
    for by policy teams
  • Broadening reach at DfES
  • Evaluation Action Research projects providing
    CPD and cross promotion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com