How have revolutions been traditionally studied - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

How have revolutions been traditionally studied

Description:

Bring about or resist social change (form existing social policies or traditions) ... Gustave Dor and Jerrold Blanchard. London is all too charged with misery. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: bagu5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How have revolutions been traditionally studied


1
How have revolutions been traditionally studied?
  • Bernardo Aguilar-Gonzalez

2
Social Movement Theory (De Fronzo)
  • Social Movement
  • Persistent and organized effort
  • Large number of people
  • Bring about or resist social change (form
    existing social policies or traditions)
  • Examples
  • Progressive antislavery movement, anti Vietnam
    war movement, civil rights movement,
  • Conservative pro-life and anti-pornography
    movement etc.

3
  • Classification based on the extent of the change
  • Reform movement Changes limited aspects of a
    society
  • Revolutionary movement Alter drastically or
    replace totally existing social, economic or
    political institutions

4
The issue of means
  • Violence
  • Terrorism the use of force to intimidate for
    political purposes
  • Revolution
  • Peoples war All the people support and fight
    the established order
  • Guerrilla warfare Mobile warfare involving small
    units of combatants operating behind enemy lines
  • Counter insurgence

5
What is the social context that we are looking at?
The use of violence in revolution is usually
related to Marxist ideas of historical
materialism and class struggle
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Coalbrookdale
16
London A PilgrimageGustave Doré and Jerrold
Blanchard
London is all too charged with misery. The mighty
capital comprehends whole townships of the almost
hopeless poor. You step out of the Strand into
Drury Lane or Bedfordbury out of Regent Street
by the East, into the slums of the shirtless out
of the Royal Exchange into Petticoat Lane nay,
out of the glittering halls of Parliament into
the Alsatia that--diminished, but not
destroyed--lies, a shame and scandal, behind
Westminster Abbey. The Devil's Acre skirts the
Broad Sanctuary. But, a great hospital faces St.
Stephen's and sits, a comely presence by the
river side, within the shadow of the Lollard's
Tower. The silver fringes are deepening from day
to day round the cloud whereon we have traced the
acuteness of London misery.
17
Marx 101
  • Historical Dialectical Materialism
  • Social relations and History are defined by the
    forces of production and power is defined by
    their ownership.
  • Class structure
  • Surplus or Value added is appropriated by
    capitalists.
  • Social control and oppression-Class struggle
  • Revolution is the only means of change to
    establish social property and evolve toward a
    communist situation

18
(No Transcript)
19
means
  • Peaceful means
  • e.g.The social democratic idea revolution is
    possible through social reform (in the SPD Karl
    Kautsky, Rosa Luxembourg Reform or Revolution, vs
    Edward Bernstein Evolutionary Socialism).

20
Iconic Representation Eisenstein
  • Battleship Potemkin
  • October

21
Left wing and right wing revolution
  • Originates in the French Revolution-national
    assembly of 1789.
  • The Jacobins were sitting on the left.
  • LW Main goal to change social and political
    institutions in order to alter the dominant
    relationships in a society
  • RW Restoration of traditional institutions.

22
Theories of Revolution
  • Marxist
  • Revolution is the result of class struggle (based
    on technological and economic change that create
    the conditions)
  • Systems
  • Revolution will happen when pre-revolutionary
    social structure fail to perform, no matter what
    the cause of the failure
  • Modernization
  • Revolution is likely to occur when those holding
    state power are unable or unwilling to meet the
    demands of those groups mobilized by
    modernization (no assumption of historical stages
    of development)
  • Structural
  • Revolution is triggered by objective conditions
    in the social structure
  • Purpose Establishment of a new governmental
    system in a less developed society that would be
    able to utilize available resources to counter
    external threats from more advanced nations
  • Suggests that his definition resolves the lacking
    characteristics of the others

23
De Fronzos critical factors that lead to a
revolution
  • Mass frustration resulting in popular uprisings
    among urban and rural populations
  • Dissident elite political movements
  • With a wide range of ideologies
  • Unifying motivations
  • Nationalism
  • Ant imperialism
  • others
  • Severe political crisis paralyzing the
    administrative and coercive capacity of the
    state
  • Permissive or tolerant world context

24
The ones that failed did not have the ingredients
25
The case studies of El Salvador and Peru
26
Soaccording to De Fronzo
  • Do you agree with his assessment of El Salvador?
  • How would you evaluate the Shining Path process
    in Peru?

27
Schools of thought according to Goldstone (George
Mason U.)
  • Natural Histories (1920s-30s)
  • General Theories of Political Violence
    (1960s-70s)
  • Structural Theories (1970s-80s)
  • Functional Theories (1990s)

28
Natural Histories
  • Based on the English Revolution of 1640, American
    Revolution of 1776, French Revolution of 1789 and
    Russian Revolution of 1917
  • Law Like Empirical Generalizations. When and how
    will it happen?

29
When and How?
30
When and How?
31
But
  • What are the causes of revolutions?

32
General Theories of Political Violence
  • Psychological Approach (Davies and Gurr-U. of
    Maryland) Misery breeds revolt
  • Social Institutions (Smelser (Stanford U.) and
    Johnson-)- institutional subsystems may change
    and create an imbalance
  • Huntingtons (Harvard) Synthesis Modernization
    leads to institutional imbalance because
    education and economic development increases the
    desire for change faster than political
    institutions can promote change
  • Resource Mobilization (Tilly-New School for
    Social Research)

33
But
  • 1- What were the conditions behind the internal
    breakdown of the states? What structural
    conditions determine them?
  • 2- Different kinds of societies experience
    different types of social change, sohow can we
    classify these different types of state and
    agrarian relationships and their consequences?

34
Structural Theories (Theda Skocpol-Harvard)
  • State Weakness
  • Conflicts between states and elites
  • Popular uprisings
  • Peasant revolts
  • Peasant solidarity peasant capacity landlord
    vulnerability
  • Urban uprisings
  • Cost of food and availability of employment tend
    to be triggering factors. Rapid urban growth can
    also be destabilizing.

35
SoDe Fronzo is a structuralist, but
  • What about the process? Is there no agency beyond
    macro-social structural factors?

36
Fourth Generation Structural-Functional Theory
37
The Issues of Nationalism and Conjuncture
  • The common ideology is that the change proposal
    will be a superior guide to fulfilling the
    material and spiritual needs of the nation.
    Even with Marxism, ideologies were molded to
    national contexts
  • Why are certain times better than others?
  • Goldstone suggests long waves of population
    growth and prices-imbalance between political
    demands and capacity of government

38
(No Transcript)
39
So
  • What happens when power shifts away from the
    State? Thenrevolution is not possible?

40
Jeff Goodwin (NYU)
  • Strengths and Limitations of State-Centered
    Approaches to study social revolutions
  • Revolutions are unusually state-centered
    phenomena, thus state-centered approaches are
    useful-Do you agree?
  • Yet, they have reasonable limitations worth
    studying
  • Four Types of Analysis How are they Useful?
  • State Autonomy
  • Material and organizational capacity to implement
    political agenda
  • Political Opportunities
  • State Constructionism-State shapes identities,
    emotions, ideas, etc.

41
Usefulness?
  • No State, no revolution
  • The secular struggle between classes is
    ultimately resolved at the political, not at the
    economic or cultural level of society.
  • The State is an institutional integration of
    power relationships-it constructs or reconstructs
    localized power relationships.
  • Formation of Movements (State Characteristics
    that Help Them)
  • Sponsorship/protection of unpopular economic and
    social arrangements
  • Exclusion of mobilized groups from power or
    resources
  • Indiscriminate, but not overwhelming, state
    violence
  • Weak policing capacity and infrastructural power
  • Corrupt and arbitrary personalistic rule with
    effect on elites

42
Criticisms that Goodwin finds useful or dismisses
  • Dismisses
  • Societies affect states as much or more than
    states affects societies
  • State officials are not autonomous actors
  • SC neglects the purposive and cultural dimensions
    of social action
  • The distinction between states and societies
    is untenable
  • Accepts as useful
  • SC does not theorize non-state or nonpolitical
    sources of collective action
  • Associational networks
  • Material Resources
  • Collective beliefs and discourses

43
This is why we need to study the new ways that
revolutions are understood by incorporating those
factors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com