Transition to Democracy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Transition to Democracy

Description:

Larry Diamond: 'Is the Third Wave over? ... Group 2 exit by coup or elite reshuffle; pace of democratisation delayed. Explanations 5 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: BillT80
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transition to Democracy


1
Transition to Democracy
  • And associated conceptual frameworks

2
Interesting articles
  • Larry Diamond Is the Third Wave over?
    http//muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_democracy/
    v007/7.3/diamond.html
  • Paul Lewis Theories of Democratisation and
    Patterns of Regime Change in Eastern Europe
    Journal of Communist Studies and Transition
    Politics Vol13, No1, March1997
  • R.F.M.Lubbers A response to Samuel Huntington
    http//www.globalize.org.clash.html

3
Samuel P.Huntington
  • Three waves of democratization
  • 1828-1926
  • 1943-1964
  • 1974-present
  • First two ended with a reverse wave

4
Diamonds Table 1
5
Lewiss groups 1997
  • Group 1
  • Hungary
  • Poland
  • Czech Republic
  • Slovenia
  • Intermediate
  • Bulgaria
  • Slovakia
  • Group 2
  • Romania
  • Croatia
  • Albania
  • Serbia

6
Hang on a minute, what about?
  • Estonia in first group of applicant countries
  • Lithuania
  • Latvia
  • Bosnia
  • Macedonia
  • Ukraine
  • Moldova
  • Byelarus
  • Russia
  • Georgia
  • Armenia
  • Azerbaijan

7
E.U.s two groups of applicants
  • Hungary
  • Poland
  • Estonia
  • Czech Republic
  • Slovenia
  • Cyprus
  • Bulgaria
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Rumania
  • Slovakia
  • Turkey

8
Explanations
  • Group 2 primarily Ottoman, Group1
    Austo-Hungarian/North European
  • Group 2 Orthodox Christian or Muslim Group 1
    Catholic or Protestant
  • such explanations stress cultural and historical
    factors

9
Explanations 2
  • Group 2 countries had stable communist rule
  • Group 1 had history of instability and
    ideological revisionism
  • Elite mass relations very different under
    Communist rule

10
Explanations 3
  • Civil society strong in group 1 countries
  • Poland church
  • Hungary dissident elections and early political
    parties
  • Czechs artists
  • East Germany Lutheran peace groups
  • Slovenia punks and youth groups

11
More on Civil society
  • Revolts GDR 1953 Hungary Poland 1956
    Czechoslovakia 1968 Poland 1980-1
  • pluralism developed as leadership retreated
    during 1980s
  • So civil society began to organise itself pre-1989

12
Explanations 4
  • Group 1 communist regimes modes of exit involved
    social movements that negotiated elections
    Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia
  • Group 2 exit by coup or elite reshuffle pace of
    democratisation delayed

13
Explanations 5
  • Modernization and socio-economic development
    higher in Group 1
  • GDP per capita higher
  • urbanisation higher
  • working in agriculture lower

14
DebateModernisation v Elite Choice
  • Lipset
  • Dahl
  • Huntington
  • Pye
  • ODonnell and Schmitter
  • Przeworski
  • Bova
  • von Beyme
  • Welsh
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com