The Spirit of Democracy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

The Spirit of Democracy

Description:

In 1974 there were only about 40 democracies in the world (27 percent of all ... (e.g. Nigeria, Angola, Chad, Gabon, and Sudan), and also Russia, Azerbaijan, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: politicsan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Spirit of Democracy


1
The Spirit of Democracy
  • The Global Boom, Recession, Renewal

2
The Democratic Boom
  • In 1974 there were only about 40 democracies in
    the world (27 percent of all independent states)
  • By 1984, there were 60 (36)
  • By 1990 there were 76 (46)
  • Then the Berlin Wall came crashing down
  • 1991 91 democracies (50
  • 1995 117 democracies (61)
  • 1999 120 democracies (63)

3
(No Transcript)
4
A Tidal Wave of Transitions
  • Since 1974, 97 countries (of a total of 196 that
    have existed in this period) made transitions to
    democracy.
  • 64 of the existing authoritarian states in 1974
    (58) became democracies during this period
  • 21 of the 27 new, postcolonial states became
    democracies (78)
  • 12 of the 20 new post-communist states (60)

5
Transitions to Democracy, 1974-2007
6
The Globalization of Democracy
  • During this period, democracy became a global
    phenomenon. Today
  • 31 of 33 Latin Am states are democracies (94)
  • 18 of 28 in Eastern Europe and FSU (64)
  • 8 of 25 in Asia (32) (9 of 12 Pacific Island)
  • 23 of 48 in Sub-Saharan Africa (48) (or less?)
  • But only 2 of 19 in the Middle East
  • And there are no Arab democracies today in the ME

7
Democracy by Region, 2007
8
Freedom by Region, 1974 and 2006
9
Freedom Scores of 43 Muslim-Majority States
10
Some Facts About Democracy Development (2008)
  • Of the 22 countries ranking low on the latest
    UNDP Human Development Index (HDI, for 2005), 9
    (41) are democracies
  • Of the next 37 countries (low-medium HDI), 14
    (38) are democracies
  • In all, 39 (23 of 59) relatively poor countries
    are democracies today

11
The Democratic Recession
  • Since 1999, the proportion of democracies in the
    world has essentially stagnated, oscillating
    between about 60 and 62.5 percent.
  • But the number of democratic breakdowns has
    increased. Of the 23 democratic breakdowns since
    1974, 15 (2/3) have occurred since 1999.
  • These have come in some very strategic states
  • Pakistan, Russia, Nigeria, Venezuela. In 2007
    Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Kenya.

12
(No Transcript)
13
Ratio of Gains to Declines in Freedom, 1991-2007
14
Oil Democracy Dont Mix
  • About 23 countries derive more than 60 percent of
    their exports earnings from oil and gas exports
  • 12 of these are in the Middle East, 7 in Africa
    (e.g. Nigeria, Angola, Chad, Gabon, and Sudan),
    and also Russia, Azerbaijan, Brunei, and
    Venezuela.
  • Not a single one of these 23 is a democracy.

15
Public Support for Democracy 1Broad but thin
  • who say Democracy is Always Preferable
  • 62 in Africa (2005, 18 countries) (69 in 2000)
  • 60 in East Asia (ca. 2002)
  • 64 in South Asia (2004)
  • 53 in Latin America (2007)
  • 53 in Eastern Europe (2004)

16
Public Support for Democracy 2
  • Broad rejection of military rule
  • 73 in Africa, 83 in E Asia, 60 in S. Asia,
    62 in Latin America
  • But significant percentages in many countries
    entertain authoritarian options
  • Only about half in East Asia and Africa reject
    all authoritarian options

17
Support for Democracy-Latin Am 1 Democracy
Always Maybe Authoritarianism
18
Support for Democracy Lat Am 2 Democracy Always
Maybe Authoritarianism
19
Support for Democracy Africa 2005
Botsw S Afr Kenya Seneg Ghana Nigeria
20
How People View Democracy 3Satisfaction with
democracy
  • Africa 45 in 2005
  • (52 in 02, 58 in 2000)
  • E Asia 61 in 2002
  • Latin Am 38 in 2006 (31 in 2005)
  • East Europe 38 in 2004
  • Compared to established democracies
  • Orig EU 15 66 in 2006

21
How People View Democracy 4Low Trust in
Institutions
22
The Philippines in TroubleDecline in Public
Support 2001 to 2005
  • Democracy is always preferable 64 to 51
  • Democ is suitable for our country 80 to 57
  • Satisfaction w/way democ works 54 to 39
  • Reject authoritarian strong leader 70 to 59

23
Nigeria in TroubleDeclines In Public Support,
2000-2005
24
Why Democracy is in Danger
  • Weak Rule of Law
  • Corruption, abuse of power
  • Abuse of ind rights, impunity
  • Violence, criminality, lawlessness
  • 2. Poor Economic Performance
  • Poverty, inequality, injustice

25
Why Democracy is in Danger 2
  • 3. Ethnic religious divisions
  • 4. Weak Ineffective Political Institutions
    (parties, parliaments, systems of horizontal
    accountability)
  • 5. Weak constraints on authoritarian leaders
    (civil society, intl actors)
  • ? BAD GOVERNANCE

26
Renewing Democratic Progress Consolidating
Fragile Democracies
  • Key Goal Foster Good Governance
  • State Capacity
  • Commitment to the Public Good
  • Transparency and Accountability
  • Rule of Law
  • Participation and Dialogue
  • Social Capital (Civil Society)

27
Key Challenges
  • Consolidate Emerging democracies
  • to become more effective, accountable, lawful,
    responsive, legitimate, and therefore stable.
  • Democratize (electoral) authoritarian regimes
  • Halt the backlash vs. democracy democ promotion
  • Russia, Venezuela, Bolivia
  • Reverse the slide toward state decay and failure
  • Stabilize rebuild failed states
  • Liberia, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan

28
Political Will The Essential Condition
  • Political will is the commitment of a countrys
    rulers to democratic and good governance reforms,
    and their readiness to incur the costs necessary
    to adopt and implement these reforms.
  • In badly governed states, the central challenge
    is to generate the political will to improve
    governance, control corruption, and generate real
    development

29
Getting SeriousStrategic Principles for Intl
Actors
  • 1. Overall levels of international assistance
    must be linked more clearly to a countrys
    development performance and its will to reform.
  • 2. Good performers must be tangibly rewarded
  • 3. Rewards must be granted for demonstrated
    performance, not for promises made and broken.

30
Strategic Principles, cont.
  • General budgetary support for governments should
    be conditioned on good governance, or
    implementation of institutional reforms.
  • Where the will to reform is completely lacking,
    assistance to governments should be sharply
    reduced and channeled mainly through NGOs or
    direct projects.
  • DO NOT SUBSIDIZE systemic corruption and bad
    governance.

31
Strategic Principles cont.
  • International donors, bilateral and multilateral,
    must coordinate their policies and strategies to
    enhance the incentives for good governance and
    the penalties for bad governance.
  • Aid NGOs, think tanks, and associations working
    to monitor and improve the quality of governance
    in recipient countrieswith a high priority on
    controlling corruption.
  • Where committed reformers can be identified
    within the state, work with them.

32
Strategic Principles cont.
  • Enhance state technical and administrative
    capacity, but not in states that lack the
    political will to improve governance. (Study the
    record of judicial reform).
  • Strengthen the international rule of law close
    off corrupt flows of money, crack down on
    international criminal networks, build the ICC.

33
Strategic Principles, cont.
  • Increase funding for democracy assistance
    programs, and increase overall development
    assistance, but set tough standards dont grade
    on a curve
  • Craft a viable and sustainable strategy for
    promoting democratic reform in the Arab world.
    This must include serious leverage (e.g.,
    conditioning aid to Egypt) and talking to
    moderate Islamists who commit to the democratic
    rules of the game.

34
Strategic Principles, cont.
  • Physician Heal Thyself the U.S. and Europe
    must improve the quality, fairness, and
    transparency of their own democracies, so that
    they become more worthy of emulation.
  • rein in abuse of power
  • fight corruption more vigorously
  • make elections more competitive
  • transcend partisan polarization
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com